A Systematic Approach to Instruction in Research Ethics

This article describes a systematic approach for developing instructional programs that emphasizes defining learning needs, planning the learning environment, and evaluating learning to ensure continuous course improvement. This review outlines the nature of these interrelated components of instructional development and draws attention to issues specific to instruction in research ethics. Guiding questions summarize key, practical considerations, and the discussion suggests future steps in the pursuit of effective instruction in research ethics. Overall, the variety of approaches to instruction and mixed findings regarding its effectiveness underscore the need to apply a systematic framework to instruction in research ethics.

[1]  S. Bird,et al.  Mentors, advisors and supervisors: Their role in teaching responsible research conduct , 2001, Science and engineering ethics.

[2]  M. Kalichman,et al.  Reported Goals for Responsible Conduct of Research Courses , 2007, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[3]  Elizabeth Heitman,et al.  Instruction in the Responsible Conduct of Research: An Inventory of Programs and Materials within CTSAs , 2010, Clinical and translational science.

[4]  M. Kalichman,et al.  Student perceptions of the effectiveness of education in the responsible conduct of research , 2006, Science and engineering ethics.

[5]  Shane Connelly,et al.  Environmental Influences on Ethical Decision Making: Climate and Environmental Predictors of Research Integrity , 2007 .

[6]  K. M. Muskavitch.  Cases and goals for ethics education--Commentary on "Connecting case-based ethics instruction with educational theory". , 2005, Science and engineering ethics.

[7]  Wen-Chih Liao,et al.  Organizational justice, motivation to learn, and training outcomes , 2006 .

[8]  Kelly R Risbey,et al.  What Do Mentoring and Training in the Responsible Conduct of Research Have To Do with Scientists’ Misbehavior? Findings from a National Survey of NIH-Funded Scientists , 2007, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[9]  J. DuBois,et al.  Content Analysis of Major Textbooks and Online Resources Used in Responsible Conduct of Research Instruction , 2011, AJOB primary research.

[10]  Malhar N. Kumar.  A Theoretical Comparison of the Models of Prevention of Research Misconduct , 2010, Accountability in research.

[11]  P. Laurienti,et al.  Fostering a Culture of Responsible Lab Conduct , 2008, Science.

[12]  Chuck Huff,et al.  Moral pedagogy and practical ethics , 2005, Science and engineering ethics.

[13]  Winston Bennett,et al.  A META-ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONS AMONG TRAINING CRITERIA , 1997 .

[14]  Melissa S. Anderson,et al.  Normal Misbehavior: Scientists Talk about the Ethics of Research , 2006, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.

[15]  Donald L. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Evaluating Training Programs : The Four Levels , 2009 .

[16]  William A. Weeks,et al.  The Effects of Gender and Career Stage on Ethical Judgment , 1999 .

[17]  Shane Connelly,et al.  A New Approach to Assessing Ethical Conduct in Scientific Work , 2003, Accountability in research.

[18]  Shane Connelly,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Ethics Instruction Effectiveness in the Sciences , 2009, Ethics & behavior.

[19]  Karen B Schmaling,et al.  Ethics Instruction Increases Graduate Students' Responsible Conduct of Research Knowledge but not Moral Reasoning , 2009, Accountability in research.

[20]  C. Funk,et al.  Authorship and Publication Practices: Evaluation of the Effect of Responsible Conduct of Research Instruction to Postdoctoral Trainees , 2007, Accountability in research.

[21]  Michael W. Kalichman,et al.  Effectiveness of a responsible conduct of research course: a preliminary study , 2007, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[22]  J. Herkert,et al.  Ways of thinking about and teaching ethical problem solving: Microethics and macroethics in engineering , 2005, Science and engineering ethics.

[23]  James M Dubois,et al.  Teaching and Assessing the Responsible Conduct of Research: A Delphi Consensus Panel Report. , 2009, The journal of research administration.

[24]  E. Ripley,et al.  Guiding the Next Generation of NIH Investigators in Responsible Conduct of Research: The Role of the Mentor , 2012, Accountability in research.

[25]  Donovan A. McFarlane,et al.  Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels , 2006 .

[26]  Bradley J. Brummel,et al.  Outcomes Assessment of Role-Play Scenarios for Teaching Responsible Conduct of Research , 2011, Accountability in research.

[27]  Elizabeth Heitman,et al.  New Graduate Students’ Baseline Knowledge of the Responsible Conduct of Research , 2007, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[28]  Shane Connelly,et al.  Applying Cases to Solve Ethical Problems: The Significance of Positive and Process-Oriented Reflection , 2012, Ethics & behavior.

[29]  C. Fisher,et al.  Graduate Socialization in the Responsible Conduct of Research: A National Survey on the Research Ethics Training Experiences of Psychology Doctoral Students , 2009, Ethics & behavior.

[30]  Michael C Loui.  Educational technologies and the teaching of ethics in science and engineering , 2005, Science and engineering ethics.

[31]  Irwin L. Goldstein,et al.  Training in organizations: Needs assessment, development, and evaluation , 1986 .

[32]  Shane Connelly,et al.  A Sensemaking Approach to Ethics Training for Scientists: Preliminary Evidence of Training Effectiveness , 2008, Ethics & behavior.

[33]  J. I. Seeman,et al.  Credit and Authorship Practices: Educational and Environmental Influences , 2010, Accountability in research.

[34]  Margaret A. Roytek,et al.  Enhancing instructional design efficiency: Methodologies employed by instructional designers , 2010, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[35]  Shane Connelly,et al.  Evaluating the Effects That Existing Instruction on Responsible Conduct of Research Has on Ethical Decision Making , 2010, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[36]  Ruth Ellen Bulger,et al.  The History, Purpose, and Future of Instruction in the Responsible Conduct of Research , 2007, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[37]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Case-based reasoning and instructional design: Using stories to support problem solving , 2002 .

[38]  Lauren N. Harkrider,et al.  Leader Ethical Decision-Making in Organizations: Strategies for Sensemaking , 2012 .

[39]  A. Mastroianni,et al.  Encouraging accountability in research: a pilot assessment of training efforts. , 1999, Accountability in research.

[40]  S. Jacobsen,et al.  Teaching and Learning Responsible Research Conduct: Influences of Prior Experiences on Acceptance of New Ideas , 2008, Accountability in research.

[41]  Joan E Sieber,et al.  Teaching ethics in science and engineering: Effective online education , 2005, Science and engineering ethics.

[42]  M. Kalichman,et al.  Responding to Challenges in Educating for the Responsible Conduct of Research , 2007, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[43]  Sandra L. Titus,et al.  Mentoring and Research Misconduct: An Analysis of Research Mentoring in Closed ORI Cases , 2008, Sci. Eng. Ethics.

[44]  Mark Bullen,et al.  What is Instructional Design , 2014 .

[45]  M. Cho,et al.  Barriers to Considering Ethical and Societal Implications of Research: Perceptions of Life Scientists , 2012, AJOB primary research.

[46]  Joan E Sieber.  Misconceptions and realities about teaching online , 2005, Science and engineering ethics.

[47]  Donald P. Ely.  Education and Training: Two Paths or One? , 1985 .

[48]  Shane Connelly,et al.  ARTICLES: Validation of Ethical Decision Making Measures: Evidence for a New Set of Measures , 2006 .

[49]  E. Heitman,et al.  Assessing the Educational Literature in the Responsible Conduct of Research for Core Content , 2005, Accountability in research.

[50]  Jimmy H Smith.  Topics and cases for online education in engineering , 2005, Science and engineering ethics.

[51]  Brian Schrag,et al.  Teaching research ethics: Can web-based instruction satisfy appropriate pedagogical objectives? , 2005, Science and engineering ethics.

[52]  Kenneth W Goodman,et al.  The CITI Program: An International Online Resource for Education in Human Subjects Protection and the Responsible Conduct of Research , 2007, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[53]  S. Messick.  Validity of Psychological Assessment: Validation of Inferences from Persons' Responses and Performances as Scientific Inquiry into Score Meaning. Research Report RR-94-45. , 1994 .

[54]  Matthew W. Keefer,et al.  Making good use of online case study materials , 2005, Science and engineering ethics.

[55]  Janice Z. Rouiller,et al.  The relationship between organizational transfer climate and positive transfer of training , 1993 .

[56]  E. Salas,et al.  The science of training: a decade of progress. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[57]  E. Heitman,et al.  Expanding Responsible Conduct of Research Instruction across the University , 2007, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[58]  Charles P. Friedman,et al.  Creating an Infrastructure for Training in the Responsible Conduct of Research: The University of Pittsburgh's Experience , 2006, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[59]  Shane Connelly,et al.  Personality and Ethical Decision-Making in Research: The Role of Perceptions of Self and others , 2007, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.