How long do females really listen? Assessment time for female mate choice in the grey treefrog, Hyla versicolor

Abstract A satisfactory understanding of the process of mate choice in many species of anurans requires that we know how sensitive females are to the variation in male calls under natural conditions and what is the timescale or ‘window’ over which females compare potential mates. In natural choruses, grey treefrog females may sit near calling males for many minutes before approaching a particular individual to mate, whereas in laboratory-based phonotaxis tests, they may approach a speaker within 30 s of exposure to broadcast calls. Females prefer long versus short calls. To estimate ‘assessment time’ of females in nature, we broadcast calls from four pairs of 360-degree speakers suspended within screen cages at four locations at the edge of a pond. One speaker per pair presented calls of constant duration while the other speaker shifted between broadcasts of calls that were longer or shorter than the constant duration call. The time period over which this change in call duration occurred differed between the four venues. Laboratory-based choice tests indicated that females preferred call sources with variable numbers of pulses to those with constant numbers of pulses when the former had more total pulses per time window. Accordingly, we assigned the probabilities of field captures at the different speakers based on the summed pulses from the constant and cycling speakers within the possible assessment windows. These probabilities, together with the numbers of females captured at the speaker array over the breeding season, indicated that the most likely assessment time is close to 2 min.

[1]  M. Petrie,et al.  VARIATION IN MATE CHOICE AND MATING PREFERENCES: A REVIEW OF CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES , 1997, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[2]  Matthew S. Sullivan,et al.  Mate choice as an information gathering process under time constraint: implications for behaviour and signal design , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  Female preference functions based on call duration in the gray tree frog (Hyla versicolor) , 2000 .

[4]  J. M. Black,et al.  Mate-selection behaviour and sampling strategies in geese , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  Y. Dombrovsky,et al.  On Adaptive Search and Optimal Stopping in Sequential Mate Choice , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[6]  P. Backwell,et al.  Time constraints and multiple choice criteria in the sampling behaviour and mate choice of the fiddler crab, Uca annulipes , 1996, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[7]  Daniel D. Wiegmann,et al.  Search behaviour and mate choice by female field crickets, Gryllus integer , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  Barney Luttbeg,et al.  Assessing the robustness and optimality of alternative decision rules with varying assumptions , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  L. Brown.  Patterns of female choice in mottled sculpins (Cottidae, teleostei) , 1981, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  Eldridge S. Adams,et al.  Active mate choice at cock-of-the-rock leks: tactics of sampling and comparison , 1989, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[11]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Acoustic interactions among male gray treefrogs, Hyla versicolor, in a chorus setting , 2002, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[12]  T. G. Forrest,et al.  Models of female choice in acoustic communication , 1994 .

[13]  K. Wells,et al.  The effect of social interactions on calling energetics in the gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor) , 1986, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[14]  M. Ryan.  The Tungara Frog: A Study in Sexual Selection and Communication , 1986 .

[15]  L. Real.  Search Theory and Mate Choice. I. Models of Single-Sex Discrimination , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[16]  T. U. Grafe,et al.  Costs and benefits of mate choice in the lek-breeding reed frog, Hyperolius marmoratus , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  L. Real,et al.  Sequential search and the influence of male quality on female mating decisions , 1999, Journal of mathematical biology.

[18]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Mate sampling by female barking treefrogs (Hyla gratiosa) , 2002 .

[19]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  Spatially mediated release from auditory masking in an anuran amphibian , 1989, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[20]  G. Patricelli,et al.  Complex Mate Searching in the Satin Bowerbird Ptilonorhynchus violaceus , 2001, The American Naturalist.

[21]  M. Ryan,et al.  Light Levels Influence Female Choice in Tiingara Frogs: Predation Risk Assessment? , 1997 .

[22]  R. Haven Wiley,et al.  5 – Adaptations for Acoustic Communication in Birds: Sound Transmission and Signal Detection , 1982 .

[23]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  Female mate choice in the gray treefrog (Hyla versicolor) in three experimental environments , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[24]  A. Arak.  Female mate selection in the natterjack toad: active choice or passive atraction? , 1988, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[25]  Bernd Fritzsch,et al.  The Evolution of the amphibian auditory system , 1988 .

[26]  H. Carl Gerhardt,et al.  Acoustic communication in two groups of closely related treefrogs. , 2001 .

[27]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Dynamic properties of the advertisement calls of gray tree frogs: patterns of variability and female choice , 1996 .

[28]  T. Halliday,et al.  Calling by male midwife toads stimulates females to maintain reproductive condition , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[29]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Female mate choice in treefrogs: static and dynamic acoustic criteria , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[30]  D. Hudson.  Interval Estimation from the Likelihood Function , 1971 .

[31]  A. Janetos.  Strategies of female mate choice: A theoretical analysis , 1980, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[32]  G. Klump,et al.  Use of non-arbitrary acoustic criteria in mate choice by female gray tree frogs , 1987, Nature.

[33]  Michael J. Ryan,et al.  Selection on Long-Distance Acoustic Signals , 2003 .

[34]  B. Truax.  Acoustic Communication , 1985 .

[35]  Anil Kumar,et al.  Acoustic communication in birds , 2003 .

[36]  M. Sullivan.  Assessing female choice for mates when the males' characters vary during the sampling period , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[37]  K. Wells,et al.  Individual, nightly, and seasonal variation in calling behavior of the gray tree frog, Hyla versicolor: implications for energy expenditure , 1994 .

[38]  Barney Luttbeg,et al.  A Comparative Bayes tactic for mate assessment and choice , 1996 .

[39]  R. Meldola.  Sexual Selection , 1871, Nature.

[40]  J. Endler.  Signals, Signal Conditions, and the Direction of Evolution , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[41]  Lori Wollerman.  Background noise from a natural chorus alters female discrimination of male calls in a Neotropical frog , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[42]  J. Stamps,et al.  Female Mate Choice Tactics in A Resource‐Based Mating System: Field Tests of Alternative Models , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[43]  M. Ryan,et al.  Light Levels Influence Female Choice in Túngara Frogs: Predation Risk Assessment?@@@Light Levels Influence Female Choice in Tungara Frogs: Predation Risk Assessment? , 1997 .

[44]  A. Feng,et al.  Neural basis of hearing in real-world situations. , 2000, Annual review of psychology.

[45]  H. Gerhardt,et al.  Within-male variability in call properties and female preference in the grey treefrog , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[46]  J. Robertson.  Female choice, male strategies and the role of vocalizations in the Australian frog Uperoleia rugosa , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[47]  R. Gibson,et al.  How do animals choose their mates? , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[48]  G. Rose,et al.  Auditory midbrain neurons that count , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[49]  R. D. Semlitsch,et al.  Call duration as an indicator of genetic quality in male gray tree frogs. , 1998, Science.

[50]  R. Howard.  Principles of Animal Communication , 1999 .

[51]  L. Real,et al.  Some Distinguishing Features of Models of Search Behavior and Mate Choice , 1996, The American Naturalist.