Design-Based Research and Educational Technology: Rethinking Technology and the Research Agenda

The role of educational technologies in improving educational practices and outcomes has been criticized as over-hyped and insignificant. With few exceptions, the state of education has changed less than expected as a result of tools such as computers and the Internet. To a considerable degree, this is due to the minor role educational technology research plays in transforming the use of technological tools in the classroom. This article presents an analysis of technology as a process and as a value-laden system, both of which have substantial consequences to our approach to research. It is argued in the article that design-based research can address some of the deficiencies of other research methods in investigating the role of tools and techniques in the classroom. Through more democratic research practices and recognizing technology as a system beyond its tools, researchers can increase their impact on educational practice.

[1]  Lewis J. Perelman.  School's Out: Hyperlearning, the New Technology, and the End of Education , 1992 .

[2]  Joseph C. Pitt.  THE AUTONOMY OF TECHNOLOGY , 1987 .

[3]  R. Clark.  Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media , 1983 .

[4]  J. Randall Koetting,et al.  PHILOSOPHY, RESEARCH, AND EDUCATION , 2003 .

[5]  A. Feenberg.  DEMOCRATIC RATIONALIZATION : TECHNOLOGY , POWER AND FREEDOM , 2003 .

[6]  Todd Oppenheimer,et al.  The Flickering Mind: Saving Education from the False Promise of Technology , 2003 .

[7]  Todd Oppenheimer,et al.  The Computer Delusion. , 1997 .

[8]  N. Dickard,et al.  The Sustainability Challenge: Taking EdTech to the Next Level. , 2003 .

[9]  Design-Based Research: An Emerging Paradigm for Educational Inquiry , 2003 .

[10]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  The Vain Quest for a Unified Theory of Learning. , 2003 .

[11]  M. Heidegger.  The question concerning technology , 2024, East Asian Journal of Philosophy.

[12]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  A development research agenda for online collaborative learning , 2004 .

[13]  Glenn Jones.  Cyberschools: An Education Renaissance , 1996 .

[14]  A. Feenberg.  Transforming Technology: A Critical Theory Revisited , 2002 .

[15]  Gavriel Salomon,et al.  Technology and pedagogy: Why don't we see the promised revolution? , 2002 .

[16]  Larry Cuban.  Teachers and machines : the classroom use of technology since 1920 , 1986 .

[17]  M. Crotty.  The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process , 1998 .

[18]  Nicholas Rescher,et al.  Unpopular essays on technological progress , 1980 .

[19]  L. P. Saettler.  The evolution of American educational technology , 1990 .

[20]  Susan McKenney,et al.  Introducing educational design research , 2006 .

[21]  P. Twining.  Oversold and underused: computers in the classroom , 2002 .

[22]  Andrew Fluck.  Computers as Tutors , 1996 .

[23]  L. Winner.  Democracy in a technological society , 1992 .

[24]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  Questioning the Questions of Instructional Technology Research. , 1995 .

[25]  G. Wagner,et al.  The end of education , 1976 .

[26]  L. Winner.  Upon Opening the Black Box and Finding It Empty: Social Constructivism and the Philosophy of Technology , 1993 .

[27]  Jennifer S. Light,et al.  Rethinking the digital divide , 2001 .

[28]  Michael Orey,et al.  A Model for International Collaborative Development Work in Schools , 2007 .

[29]  S. Barab,et al.  Eat Your Vegetables and Do Your Homework: A Design­ Based Investigation of Enjoyment and Meaning in Learning , 2005 .

[30]  Michael J. Hannafin.  Disciplined inquiry and research in computer-supported learning , 2006, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[31]  Abbie Brown,et al.  Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in c , 1992 .

[32]  Tom Wolfe,et al.  Declining by Degrees: Higher Education at Risk , 2006 .

[33]  Yasmin B. Kafai,et al.  The Classroom as "Living Laboratory": Design-Based Research for Understanding, Comparing, and Evaluating Learning Science Through Design , 2005 .

[34]  L. Thornton,et al.  The Politics of Education , 2004 .

[35]  L. Schauble,et al.  Design Experiments in Educational Research , 2003 .

[36]  D. Hlynka.  The cultural discourses of educational technology: A Canadian perspective , 2003 .

[37]  J. Ellul.  Technology and Democracy , 1992 .

[38]  Larry A. Hickman,et al.  Philosophical Tools for Technological Culture , 2001, Philosophy of Education.

[39]  Chris Dede,et al.  Commentary: The Growing Utilization of Design-Based Research , 2005 .

[40]  Tom Loveless,et al.  The Brown Center Report on American Education: How Well Are American Students Learning? Focus on Math Achievement. , 2000 .

[41]  Tel Amiel,et al.  Mistaking Computers for Technology: Technology Literacy and the Digital Divide , 2004 .

[42]  D. Jonassen.  Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm? , 1991 .

[43]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  Why Do Teachers Need to Use Technology in Their Classrooms? Issues, Problems, and Solutions , 2003 .

[44]  Louis Arnaud Reid,et al.  Beyond neutrality : five essays on the purpose of education , 1955 .

[45]  María Dolores Fernández Tilve,et al.  Information and communication technologies in schools , 2002 .

[46]  Stephen Petrina,et al.  The Politics of Technological Literacy , 2000 .

[47]  Brian C. Nelson,et al.  Design-based Research Strategies for Developing a Scientific Inquiry Curriculum in a Multi-User Virtual Environment , 2005 .

[48]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  Design research from a technology perspective , 2006 .

[49]  A. Kelly.  Design Research in Education: Yes, but is it Methodological? , 2004 .

[50]  Gail Raymond,et al.  Questioning the media , 1987 .