Meeting the EU 2°C climate target: global and regional emission implications

Abstract This article presents a set of multi-gas emission pathways for different CO2-equivalent concentration stabilization levels, i.e. 400, 450, 500 and 550 ppm CO2-equivalent, along with an analysis of their global and regional reduction implications and implied probability of achieving the EU climate target of 2°C. For achieving the 2°C target with a probability of more than 60%, greenhouse gas concentrations need to be stabilized at 450 ppm CO2-equivalent or below, if the 90% uncertainty range for climate sensitivity is believed to be 1.5–4.5°C. A stabilization at 450 ppm CO2-equivalent or below (400 ppm) requires global emissions to peak around 2015, followed by substantial overall reductions of as much as 25% (45% for 400 ppm) compared to 1990 levels in 2050. In 2020, Annex I emissions need to be approximately 15% (30%) below 1990 levels, and non-Annex I emissions also need to be reduced by 15–20% compared to their baseline emissions. A further delay in peaking of global emissions by 10 years doubles maximum reduction rates to about 5% per year, and very probably leads to high costs. In order to keep the option open of stabilizing at 400 and 450 ppm CO2-equivalent, the USA and major advanced non-Annex I countries will have to participate in the reductions within the next 10–15 years.

[1]  A. Meyer.  Contraction & Convergence: The Global Solution to Climate Change , 2000 .

[2]  M. Elzen,et al.  Exploring Climate Regimes for Differentiation of Future Commitments to Stabilise Greenhouse Gas Concentrations , 2002 .

[3]  T. Wigley,et al.  Interpretation of High Projections for Global-Mean Warming , 2001, Science.

[4]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 2001 : the scientific basis , 2001 .

[5]  Malte Meinshausen,et al.  What does a 2 degree C target mean for greenhouse gas concentrations? - A brief analysis based on multi-gas emission pathways and several climate sensitivity uncertainty estimates. Chapter 28 , 2006 .

[6]  Jochen Harnisch,et al.  Estimating Future Emissions and Potential Reductions of HFCs, PFCs, and SF6 , 2006 .

[7]  Paul L. Lucas,et al.  The FAIR model: A tool to analyse environmental and costs implications of regimes of future commitments , 2005 .

[8]  Kmd,et al.  What if the Russians don't ratify? , 2004 .

[9]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  Global temperature change and its uncertainties since 1861 , 2001 .

[10]  Michel G.J. den Elzen,et al.  Options for differentiation of future commitments in climate policy: how to realise timely participation to meet stringent climate goals? , 2001 .

[11]  Bas Eickhout,et al.  Responses to technology and taxes in a simulated world , 2004 .

[12]  Ian G. Enting,et al.  Future emissions and concentrations of carbon dioxide: Key ocean / atmosphere / land analyses , 1994 .

[13]  Leo Schrattenholzer,et al.  Costs of Reducing Carbon Emissions: An Integrated Modeling Framework Approach , 2003 .

[14]  Vuuren Dp van,et al.  Regional costs and benefits of alternative post-Kyoto climate regimes Comparison of variants of the Multi-stage and Per Capita Convergence regimes , 2003 .

[15]  J. Weyant,et al.  Vulnerability to climate change and reasons for concern: a synthesis , 2001 .

[16]  Bas Eickhout,et al.  Long-Term Multi-Gas Scenarios to Stabilise Radiative Forcing - Exploring Costs and Benefits Within an Integrated Assessment Framework , 2006 .

[17]  Bill Hare,et al.  How Much Warming are We Committed to and How Much can be Avoided? , 2006 .

[18]  Nebojsa Nakicenovic,et al.  Model Runs with MESSAGE in the Context of the Further Development of the Kyoto-Protocol , 2003 .

[19]  Mnv,et al.  The IMAGE 2.2 implementation of the SRES scenarios; A comprehensive analysis of emissions, climate change and impacts in the 21st century , 2001 .

[20]  Patrick Criqui,et al.  World energy projections to 2030 , 2000 .

[21]  Kmd,et al.  Exploring climate regimes for differentiation of commitments to achieve the EU climate target , 2003 .

[22]  J. Hansen,et al.  Global warming in the twenty-first century: an alternative scenario. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Michel G.J. den Elzen,et al.  Abatement costs of post-Kyoto climate regimes , 2005 .

[24]  M. Allen,et al.  The blame game , 2004, Nature.

[25]  Robert Sausen,et al.  Assessing Metrics of Climate Change. Current Methods and Future Possibilities. , 2001 .

[26]  S. Schneider,et al.  Are the economic costs of (non-)stabilizing the atmosphere prohibitive? A response to Gerlagh and Papyrakis , 2003 .

[27]  Andrii Gritsevskyi,et al.  Modeling uncertainty of induced technological change , 2000 .

[28]  F. Joos,et al.  Global warming and marine carbon cycle feedbacks on future atmospheric CO2 , 1999, Science.

[29]  Stephen H. Schneider,et al.  Are the Economic Costs of Stabilising the Atmosphere Prohibitive? , 2022 .

[30]  J. Edmonds,et al.  Economic and environmental choices in the stabilization of atmospheric CO2 concentrations , 1996, Nature.

[31]  Michel G.J. den Elzen,et al.  Multi-gas Emissions Pathways to Meet Climate Targets , 2006 .

[32]  P. Lucas,et al.  Multi-Stage: A Rule-Based Evolution of Future Commitments under the Climate Change Convention , 2006 .

[33]  Acia.  Impacts of a Warming Arctic: Arctic Climate Impact Assessment , 2004 .

[34]  W. Hare,et al.  Assessment of Knowledge on Impacts of Climate Change-Contribution to the Specification of Art , 2003 .

[35]  Alban Kitous,et al.  Greenhouse gas reduction pathways in the UNFCCC process up to 2025 : policymakers summary and technical report , 2003 .

[36]  Jean Charles Hourcade,et al.  Global, Regional and national Costs and Ancillary Benefits of Mitigation , 2001 .

[37]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  Emissions trading to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the United States : the McCain-Lieberman Proposal , 2003 .

[38]  Vries B de,et al.  Projections of multi-gas emissions and carbon sinks,and marginal abatement cost functions modelling for land-use related sources , 2003 .

[39]  U. Cubasch,et al.  Emulation of the results from a coupled general circulation model using a simple climate model , 1996 .

[40]  Alexei G. Sankovski,et al.  Mitigation of Methane and Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Waste, Energy and Industry , 2006 .

[41]  Tsuneyuki Morita,et al.  Stabilisation scenarios for climate impact assessment , 2002 .

[42]  O. Davidson,et al.  Climate change 2001 : mitigation , 2001 .

[43]  Tsuneyuki Morita,et al.  Overview of mitigation scenarios for global climate stabilization based on new IPCC emission scenarios (SRES) , 2000 .

[44]  Fortunat Joos,et al.  Stabilisation of atmospheric greenhouse gases: Physical, biological, and socio-economic implications , 1997 .

[45]  Atul K. Jain,et al.  Costs of Multigreenhouse Gas Reduction Targets for the USA , 1999, Science.

[46]  R. Beach,et al.  Methane and Nitrous Oxide Mitigation in Agriculture , 2006 .

[47]  Vuuren Dp van,et al.  Multi-gas emission profiles for stabilising greenhouse gas concentrations: Emission implications of limiting global temperature increase to 2 degrees centigrade , 2004 .

[48]  J. Melillo,et al.  Multi-gas assessment of the Kyoto Protocol , 1999, Nature.

[49]  M. Collins,et al.  Projections of future climate change , 2002 .

[50]  M. Webb,et al.  Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations , 2004, Nature.

[51]  P. Stott,et al.  Human contribution to the European heatwave of 2003 , 2004, Nature.

[52]  Arctic Monitoring,et al.  Impacts of a warming Arctic : Arctic Climate Impact Assessment , 2004 .

[53]  T. Wigley,et al.  Reasons for Larger Warming Projections in the IPCC Third Assessment Report , 2002 .

[54]  D. P. Vuuren,et al.  An evaluation of the level of ambition and implications of the Bush Climate Change Initiative , 2002 .

[55]  Kmd,et al.  FAIR 2.0 - A decision-support tool to assess theenvironmental and economic consequences of future climate regimes , 2003 .

[56]  Alan S. Manne,et al.  Moving Beyond Concentrations: The Challenge of Limiting Temperature Change , 2004 .

[57]  Kristian Lindgren,et al.  Carbon Capture and Storage From Fossil Fuels and Biomass – Costs and Potential Role in Stabilizing the Atmosphere , 2006 .

[58]  Marco A. Janssen,et al.  Targets IMage Energy Regional (TIMER) Model, Technical Documentation , 2002 .

[59]  Samuel Hitz,et al.  Estimating global impacts from climate change , 2004 .

[60]  Alan S. Manne,et al.  An alternative approach to establishing trade-offs among greenhouse gases , 2001, Nature.