Digital methodologies of education governance: Pearson plc and the remediation of methods

This article analyses the rise of software systems in education governance, focusing on digital methods in the collection, calculation and circulation of educational data. It examines how software-mediated methods intervene in the ways educational institutions and actors are seen, known and acted upon through an analysis of the methodological complex of Pearson Education’s Learning Curve data-bank and its Center for Digital Data, Analytics and Adaptive Learning. This calls for critical attention to the ‘social life’ of its methods in terms of their historical, technical and methodological provenance; their affordances to generate data for circulation within the institutional circuitry of Pearson and to its wider social networks; their capacity to configure research users’ interpretations; and their generativity to produce the knowledge to influence education policy decisions and pedagogic practices. The purpose of the article is to critically survey the digital methods being mobilized by Pearson to generate educational data, and to examine how its methodological complex acts to produce a new data-based knowledge infrastructure for education. The consequence of this shift to data-based forms of digital education governance by Pearson is a challenge to the legitimacy of the social sciences in the theorization and understanding of learning, and its displacement to the authority of the data sciences.

[1]  Nelli Piattoeva,et al.  Elastic numbers: national examinations data as a technology of government , 2015, Governing by Numbers.

[2]  Ian Hardy,et al.  A logic of enumeration: the nature and effects of national literacy and numeracy testing in Australia , 2015, Governing by Numbers.

[3]  Pedro Jacobetty,et al.  Digital sociology , 2016, New Media Soc..

[4]  Ben Williamson,et al.  Digital education governance: data visualization, predictive analytics, and ‘real-time’ policy instruments , 2016 .

[5]  Katja Bachmeier Powers Of Freedom Reframing Political Thought , 2016 .

[6]  Sam Sellar,et al.  Data infrastructure: a review of expanding accountability systems and large-scale assessments in education , 2015 .

[7]  Sam Sellar,et al.  Network Restructuring Of Global Edu-Business , 2015 .

[8]  David Stuart,et al.  The Data Revolution: Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures and Their Consequences , 2015, Online Inf. Rev..

[9]  Ruth McNally,et al.  Socialising Big Data: From concept to practice , 2015 .

[10]  Stephen J. Ball,et al.  Pearson and PALF: The mutating giant , 2015 .

[11]  G. Parra,et al.  Mayer Schönberger, Viktor; Cukier, Kenneth. Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work and Think. London: John Murray, 2013 , 2015 .

[12]  B. Lingard,et al.  Network restructuring of global edu-business: the case of Pearson’s Efficacy Framework , 2015 .

[13]  Rob Kitchin,et al.  The data revolution : big data, open data, data infrastructures & their consequences , 2014 .

[14]  Mathias Decuypere,et al.  Schools in the making: mapping digital spaces of evidence , 2014 .

[15]  Gillian Rose,et al.  Networks, Interfaces, and Computer-Generated Images: Learning from Digital Visualisations of Urban Redevelopment Projects , 2014 .

[16]  Roger Burrows,et al.  After the crisis? Big Data and the methodological challenges of empirical sociology , 2014 .

[17]  Daniel T. Hickey,et al.  Educational data sciences: framing emergent practices for analytics of learning, organizations, and systems , 2014, LAK.

[18]  Eric Mangez,et al.  Governing Knowledge. Comparison, Knowledge-Based Technologies and Expertise in the Regulation of Education , 2014 .

[19]  Kristen E. DiCerbo,et al.  Harnessing the Currents of the Digital Ocean , 2014 .

[20]  Peter Hill,et al.  Preparing for a Renaissance in Assessment , 2014 .

[21]  Terence Chong,et al.  Discourse : Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education , 2014 .

[22]  David Mason,et al.  Digital Methods , 2014, Online Inf. Rev..

[23]  Adrian Mackenzie,et al.  Programming subjects in the regime of anticipation: Software studies and subjectivity , 2013 .

[24]  Mike Savage,et al.  The ‘Social Life of Methods’: A Critical Introduction , 2013 .

[25]  M. Savage,et al.  Reassembling Social Science Methods: The Challenge of Digital Devices , 2013 .

[26]  P. N. Edwards,et al.  Knowledge Infrastructures: Intellectual Frameworks and Research Challenges , 2013 .

[27]  Radhika Gorur My School, My Market , 2013 .

[28]  Ali Ait Si Mhamed Europeanizing education: Governing a new policy space , 2013 .

[29]  Avril Loveless,et al.  Learning Identities in a Digital Age: Rethinking creativity, education and technology , 2013 .

[30]  Martin Lawn The Rise of Data in Education Systems: collection, visualization and use , 2013 .

[31]  Pablo J. Boczkowski,et al.  The Relevance of Algorithms , 2013 .

[32]  N. Marres The Redistribution of Methods: On Intervention in Digital Social Research, Broadly Conceived , 2012 .

[33]  S. Ball Global Education Inc.: New Policy Networks and the Neoliberal Imaginary , 2012 .

[34]  Adriana Aubert Global Education Inc.: New policy networks and the neoliberal imaginary , 2012 .

[35]  Thomas S. Popkewitz Numbers in grids of intelligibility: Making sense of how educational truth is told , 2012 .

[36]  Christina Segerholm,et al.  Fabricating Quality in Education : Data and Governance in Europe , 2011 .

[37]  M. Savage,et al.  The Double Social Life of Methods , 2011 .

[38]  Lejf Moos,et al.  Hard and Soft Governance: The Journey from Transnational Agencies to School Leadership , 2009 .

[39]  S. Ball The governance turn! , 2009 .

[40]  Sotiria Grek,et al.  Governing by numbers: the PISA ‘effect’ in Europe , 2009 .

[41]  K. Weiler,et al.  Discourse: studies in the cultural politics of education , 2008 .

[42]  Ian Hacking,et al.  Kinds of People: Moving Targets , 2007 .

[43]  Pierre Lascoumes,et al.  Introduction: Understanding Public Policy through Its Instruments—From the Nature of Instruments to the Sociology of Public Policy Instrumentation , 2007 .

[44]  David Bawden,et al.  Memory Practices in the Sciences , 2007 .

[45]  J. Krige How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology , 2006 .

[46]  Sarita Albagli,et al.  Memory Practices in the Sciences , 2008 .

[47]  N. Oudshoorn,et al.  How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology (Inside Technology) , 2003 .

[48]  Trevor Pinch,et al.  How users and non-users matter , 2003 .

[49]  J. Overhage,et al.  Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences , 2001, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[50]  Nikolas Rose,et al.  Powers of Freedom: Contents , 1999 .

[51]  N. Rose Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought , 1999 .

[52]  N. Rose Governing the Soul: The Shaping of the Private Self , 1991 .

[53]  J. Law A Sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology, and domination , 1991 .

[54]  S. Woolgar Configuring the User: The Case of Usability Trials , 1990 .