A shell and kernel descriptor based joint deep learning model for predicting breast lesion malignancy

Predicting lesion malignancy accurately and reliably in digital breast tomosynthesis is critically important for breast cancer screening. Tumor shape and interactive effect between the tumor and surrounding normal tissue are two of the most important indicators in radiologists’ reading. On the other hand, the density and texture of region within the tumor also play an important role in malignancy classification. Inspired by the above observations, shell and kernel descriptors were proposed in this work for breast lesion malignancy prediction, in which the shell descriptor is used for describing the tumor shape and surrounding normal tissue while the kernel descriptor is used to describe the internal tumor region. A joint deep learning model based on the AlexNet was designed to learn and fuse features from shell and kernel. Additionally, to obtain more reliable predictive results, a multi-objective optimization algorithm and a reliable classifier fusion strategy were used to train the predictive model and optimally combine outputs from both shell and kernel descriptors. In this study, 278 malignant and 685 benign cases were used through 2-fold cross validation. Compared with the single descriptor based models using either shell or kernel, the experimental results demonstrated that the combined shell and kernel descriptors can capture the most important features and the corresponding predictive model achieved the best performance as well.

[1]  L. Gerweck,et al.  Cellular pH gradient in tumor versus normal tissue: potential exploitation for the treatment of cancer. , 1996, Cancer research.

[2]  Rangaraj M. Rangayyan,et al.  Measures of acutance and shape for classification of breast tumors , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  N. Weidner,et al.  Current pathologic methods for measuring intratumoral microvessel density within breast carcinoma and other solid tumors , 2004, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[4]  William C Hines,et al.  Telomere DNA content and allelic imbalance demonstrate field cancerization in histologically normal tissue adjacent to breast tumors , 2006, International journal of cancer.

[5]  Thomas Deffieux,et al.  Quantitative assessment of breast lesion viscoelasticity: initial clinical results using supersonic shear imaging. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[6]  C. Heaphy,et al.  Mammary field cancerization: molecular evidence and clinical importance , 2009, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[7]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[8]  Dong-Ling Xu,et al.  Evidential reasoning rule for evidence combination , 2013, Artif. Intell..

[9]  Diana L Miglioretti,et al.  Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A Brave New World of Mammography Screening. , 2016, JAMA oncology.

[10]  Jian Sun,et al.  Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[11]  Atul J Butte,et al.  Comprehensive analysis of normal adjacent to tumor transcriptomes , 2017, Nature Communications.

[12]  Xi Chen,et al.  Constructing multi-modality and multi-classifier radiomics predictive models through reliable classifier fusion , 2017, ArXiv.

[13]  Steve B. Jiang,et al.  Multi-objective radiomics model for predicting distant failure in lung SBRT , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.