Semi-quantitative and qualitative assessment of breast ultrasound elastography in differentiating between malignant and benign lesions.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of qualitative and semi-quantitative assessment of ultrasound elastography in differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions. This prospective study was conducted in two tertiary medical centers. Consecutive B-mode ultrasound and real-time elastographic images were obtained for 67 malignant and 101 benign breast lesions in 168 women. Four experienced radiologists analyzed B-mode ultrasound alone and B-mode ultrasound combined with elastography independently. Conventional ultrasound findings were classified according to the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System classification. The elastographic assessment was based on qualitative and semi-quantitative parameters (i.e., strain pattern, width ratio, strain ratio). The sensitivity and specificity of combined elastography and conventional ultrasound were significantly higher than that of conventional ultrasound alone. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value was 97%, 61.4%, 62.5% and 96.8%, respectively, for conventional ultrasound and 100%, 93%, 99% and 90%, respectively, for combined technique. The semi-quantitative assessment with strain ratio and width ratio in elastography were the most useful parameters in differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions. Cut-off point values for width ratio of more than 1.1 and strain ratio of more than 5.6 showed a high predictive value of malignancy with specificities of 84% and 76%, respectively (p < 0.001). This combined technique also had the best results in detecting carcinoma and could reduce the need of unnecessary biopsy for benign lesions with indeterminate or equivocal features.

[1]  T. Yılmaz,et al.  Qualitative and Semiquantitative Evaluations of Solid Breast Lesions by Sonoelastography , 2011, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[2]  Woo Kyung Moon,et al.  Distinguishing benign from malignant masses at breast US: combined US elastography and color doppler US--influence on radiologist accuracy. , 2012, Radiology.

[3]  T. Matsumura,et al.  Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. , 2006, Radiology.

[4]  M. Fink,et al.  Breast lesions: quantitative elastography with supersonic shear imaging--preliminary results. , 2010, Radiology.

[5]  Mickael Tanter,et al.  MR elastography of breast lesions: Understanding the solid/liquid duality can improve the specificity of contrast‐enhanced MR mammography , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  R. Barr,et al.  Sonographic Breast Elastography , 2012, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[7]  Jean B. Cormack,et al.  Operator dependence of physician-performed whole-breast US: lesion detection and characterization. , 2006, Radiology.

[8]  C. S. Spalding,et al.  In vivo real-time freehand palpation imaging. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[9]  M Heller,et al.  Breast ultrasound elastography--results of 193 breast lesions in a prospective study with histopathologic correlation. , 2011, European journal of radiology.

[10]  A. Stavros,et al.  Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. , 1995, Radiology.

[11]  A. Jara-Lazaro,et al.  A prospective study to compare the diagnostic performance of breast elastography versus conventional breast ultrasound. , 2010, Clinical radiology.

[12]  Corinne Balleyguier,et al.  Evaluation of Breast Lesions Using Sonographic Elasticity Imaging , 2012, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[13]  Eriko Tohno,et al.  Current improvements in breast ultrasound, with a special focus on elastography , 2008, Breast cancer.

[14]  Amanda E Lackey,et al.  The Utility of the "Bull's-Eye" Artifact on Breast Elasticity Imaging in Reducing Breast Lesion Biopsy Rate , 2011, Ultrasound quarterly.

[15]  Luigi Mariani,et al.  Role of sonoelastography in non-palpable breast lesions , 2008, European Radiology.

[16]  B. Garra,et al.  Elastography of breast lesions: initial clinical results. , 1997, Radiology.

[17]  Woo Kyung Moon,et al.  Breast mass evaluation: factors influencing the quality of US elastography. , 2011, Radiology.

[18]  H. Teh,et al.  Improving B mode ultrasound evaluation of breast lesions with real-time ultrasound elastography--a clinical approach. , 2008, Breast.

[19]  S. Raza,et al.  Using Real‐time Tissue Elastography for Breast Lesion Evaluation , 2010, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.