Hierarchical decomposition of dichoptic multifocal visual evoked potentials

Visual evoked responses to dichoptically presented multifocal stimuli were recorded for 92 eyes. Two stimulus variants were explored: temporally sparse and rapidly contrast reversing. We used hierarchal decomposition (HD) to represent the multifocal responses in terms of a small number of potentially unique component waveforms that are interrelated in a multivariate linear autoregressive (MLAR) relationship. The HD method exploits temporal correlations over a range of delays in the responses to estimate parallel, feedforward and feedback relationships between the HD components. Three HD components having temporal interrelationships constrained (at P < 0.05) to a moving ∼20 ms window could describe the multifocal responses well (median r2-values up to 90%). HD components were similar for both stimulus types and the component waveforms were temporally correlated, especially the first and third components. The data set was large enough to estimate separate HD components for each multifocal stimulus region. The component waveforms differed somewhat by region but the MLAR relationships were similar. At short delays parallel processing dominated. At longer delays the proportion of response drives that were attributed to feedback and feedforward relationships grew. Overall HD analysis seems to provide an informed summary of multifocal responses and insights into their sources.

[1]  Jonathan D. Victor,et al.  A relation between the Akaike criterion and reliability of parameter estimates, with application to nonlinear autoregressive modelling of ictal EEG , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  S. Klein,et al.  The topography of visual evoked response properties across the visual field. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[3]  A. James The pattern-pulse multifocal visual evoked potential. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[4]  S. Graham,et al.  Electrode position and the multi-focal visual-evoked potential: role in objective visual field assessment. , 1998, Australian and New Zealand journal of ophthalmology.

[5]  E. Sutter,et al.  M and P Components of the VEP and their Visual Field Distribution , 1997, Vision Research.

[6]  Donald C Hood,et al.  Conventional pattern-reversal VEPs are not equivalent to summed multifocal VEPs. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[7]  T. W. Lee,et al.  Chromatic structure of natural scenes. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[8]  J. Bullier,et al.  Response modulations by static texture surround in area V1 of the macaque monkey do not depend on feedback connections from V2. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  Andrew C. James,et al.  Spatially Sparse Pattern–Pulse Stimulation Enhances Multifocal Visual Evoked Potential Analysis , 2005 .

[10]  J. D. Victor,et al.  General Strategy for Hierarchical Decomposition of Multivariate Time Series: Implications for Temporal Lobe Seizures , 2001, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  Xian Zhang,et al.  Increasing the sensitivity of the multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) technique: incorporating information from higher order kernels using a principal component analysis method , 2004, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[12]  W Gersch,et al.  Parametric time series models for multivariate EEG analysis. , 1977, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[13]  D. Hood,et al.  Tracking the recovery of local optic nerve function after optic neuritis: a multifocal VEP study. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[14]  S. Graham,et al.  Multifocal objective perimetry in the detection of glaucomatous field loss. , 2002, American journal of ophthalmology.

[15]  Rasa Ruseckaite,et al.  Sparse multifocal stimuli for the detection of multiple sclerosis , 2005, Annals of neurology.

[16]  P Lennie,et al.  Distinctive characteristics of subclasses of red–green P-cells in LGN of macaque , 1998, Visual Neuroscience.

[17]  D. Jeffreys,et al.  Source locations of pattern-specific components of human visual evoked potentials. I. Component of striate cortical origin , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Cortical sources of the early components of the visual evoked potential , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[19]  S Kangovi,et al.  An interocular comparison of the multifocal VEP: a possible technique for detecting local damage to the optic nerve. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[20]  A. James,et al.  Effect of temporal sparseness and dichoptic presentation on multifocal visual evoked potentials , 2005, Visual Neuroscience.

[21]  R. Truscott,et al.  Protein-bound kynurenine decreases with the progression of age-related nuclear cataract. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[22]  D. Jeffreys,et al.  Cortical Source Locations of Pattern-related Visual Evoked Potentials recorded from the Human Scalp , 1971, Nature.

[23]  A. James,et al.  Contrast response of temporally sparse dichoptic multifocal visual evoked potentials , 2005, Visual Neuroscience.

[24]  Thom Carney,et al.  Using multi-stimulus VEP source localization to obtain a retinotopic map of human primary visual cortex , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.