Long-Term Results of Femtosecond Laser–Enabled Keratoplasty With Zig-Zag Trephination

Purpose: To report long-term visual and astigmatism outcomes in cases of zig-zag femtosecond laser–enabled penetrating keratoplasty (FLEK). Methods: Retrospective review. Three hundred thirty-five eyes of 287 patients underwent (FLEK) with a zig-zag incision pattern. Patients were assessed preoperatively and underwent postoperative comprehensive examinations at standard intervals of 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, and 6 months thereafter. Postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity and spectacle-corrected distance visual acuity and manifest and topographical (Mrx cyl and Topo cyl) astigmatism were compared with preoperative values. Results: Three hundred thirty-five eyes received FLEK with zig-zag configuration. Data are presented for the last recorded visit before any refractive procedure. Sutures were removed in 202 of 335 eyes at an average time to removal of 1.3 ± 1.1 years, and a mean follow-up period of 2.9 ± 2.1 years (range 0–10 years). After full suture removal, mean uncorrected distance visual acuity and spectacle-corrected distance visual acuity were logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution 0.84 (Snellen 20/138) ± 0.55 and 0.33 (Snellen 20/42) ± 0.33, respectively. Mean Mrx cyl and Topo cyl of these groups were 3.38 ± 2.22 and 4.77 ± 3.15, respectively. Of the total number of grafts, the rate of graft rejections was 14.0%, and the failure rate was 5.6%. Conclusions: The femtosecond laser–generated zig-zag–shaped incision results in lower manifest and topographical astigmatism than the reported average for conventional penetrating keratoplasty. Graft rejection and failure rates are similar to published data for conventional penetrating keratoplasty.

[1]  F. Price,et al.  Immunologic Rejection Episodes After Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty: Incidence and Risk Factors , 2017, Cornea.

[2]  D. Böhringer,et al.  Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Keratoplasty with Conventional Keratoplasty , 2016, Cornea.

[3]  D. Kook,et al.  Perioperative and postoperative risk factors for corneal graft failure , 2014, Clinical ophthalmology.

[4]  E. Levinger,et al.  Outcome of “Mushroom” Pattern Femtosecond Laser–Assisted Keratoplasty Versus Conventional Penetrating Keratoplasty in Patients With Keratoconus , 2014, Cornea.

[5]  J. Güell,et al.  Historical Review and Update of Surgical Treatment for Corneal Endothelial Diseases , 2014, Ophthalmology and Therapy.

[6]  R. D. Stulting,et al.  The effect of donor age on penetrating keratoplasty for endothelial disease: graft survival after 10 years in the Cornea Donor Study. , 2013, Ophthalmology.

[7]  R. Steinert,et al.  Femtosecond Laser-enabled Keratoplasty , 2013, International ophthalmology clinics.

[8]  D. Böhringer,et al.  Improved Wound Stability of Top-Hat Profiled Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Penetrating Keratoplasty In Vitro , 2012, Cornea.

[9]  Y. Rabinowitz,et al.  Penetrating keratoplasty using femtosecond laser-enabled keratoplasty with zig-zag incisions versus a mechanical trephine in patients with keratoconus , 2012, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[10]  Roni M. Shtein,et al.  In vivo confocal microscopic evaluation of corneal wound healing after femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty. , 2012, Ophthalmic surgery, lasers & imaging : the official journal of the International Society for Imaging in the Eye.

[11]  R. Steinert,et al.  Comparison of Corneal Surface Higher-Order Aberrations After Endothelial Keratoplasty, Femtosecond Laser–Assisted Keratoplasty, and Conventional Penetrating Keratoplasty , 2012, Cornea.

[12]  D. Böhringer,et al.  Clinical results of 123 femtosecond laser-assisted penetrating keratoplasties , 2012, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[13]  D. Ponzin,et al.  Risk Factors for Graft Failure After Penetrating Keratoplasty: 5-Year Follow-Up From the Corneal Transplant Epidemiological Study , 2011, Cornea.

[14]  Mohammad Zare,et al.  Current Approaches for Management of Postpenetrating Keratoplasty Astigmatism , 2011, Journal of ophthalmology.

[15]  L. Laroche,et al.  Graft rejection and graft failure after anterior lamellar versus penetrating keratoplasty. , 2011, American journal of ophthalmology.

[16]  Frederick W. Fraunfelder,et al.  Comparison of femtosecond laser-assisted keratoplasty versus conventional penetrating keratoplasty. , 2011, Ophthalmology.

[17]  Roger F Steinert,et al.  Femtosecond laser-assisted corneal surgery , 2010, Current opinion in ophthalmology.

[18]  R. Steinert,et al.  Comparison of penetrating keratoplasty performed with a femtosecond laser zig-zag incision versus conventional blade trephination. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[19]  A. Brahma,et al.  Penetrating keratoplasty: indications, outcomes, and complications , 2009, Eye.

[20]  M. Zimmerman,et al.  Postoperative Complications After Primary Adult Optical Penetrating Keratoplasty: Prevalence and Impact on Graft Survival , 2009, Cornea.

[21]  I. Bahar,et al.  Femtosecond laser versus manual dissection for top hat penetrating keratoplasty , 2008, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[22]  I. Bahar,et al.  Femtosecond Laser-assisted Penetrating Keratoplasty: Stability Evaluation of Different Wound Configurations , 2008, Cornea.

[23]  Matthew Kim,et al.  Results of penetrating keratoplasty performed with a femtosecond laser zigzag incision initial report. , 2007, Ophthalmology.

[24]  Roger F Steinert,et al.  "Top hat"-shaped penetrating keratoplasty using the femtosecond laser. , 2007, American journal of ophthalmology.

[25]  H. Souri,et al.  Outcomes of Penetrating Keratoplasty in Keratoconus , 2005, Cornea.

[26]  Robert W. Thompson,et al.  Long-term graft survival after penetrating keratoplasty. , 2003, Ophthalmology.

[27]  M. Busin A new lamellar wound configuration for penetrating keratoplasty surgery. , 2003, Archives of ophthalmology.

[28]  R. Olson,et al.  Penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus: a long-term review of results and complications. , 2000, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[29]  D. Hodge,et al.  Ten-year postoperative results of penetrating keratoplasty. , 1998, Ophthalmology.

[30]  L. Dandona,et al.  Survival analysis and visual outcome in a large series of corneal transplants in India , 1997, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[31]  I. Schwab,et al.  Comparison of astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty by experienced cornea surgeons and cornea fellows. , 1997, American journal of ophthalmology.

[32]  C. Rapuano,et al.  100-year review of cornea. , 1996, Ophthalmology.

[33]  R. Marks,et al.  Five-year corneal graft survival. A large, single-center patient cohort. , 1993, Archives of ophthalmology.

[34]  D. Roder,et al.  Factors predictive of corneal graft survival. Report from the Australian Corneal Graft Registry. , 1992, Ophthalmology.

[35]  W. J. Hadden,et al.  A Comparison of , 1971 .