ANALYSIS OF BARRIERS TO LEAN IMPLEMENTATION IN MACHINE TOOL SECTOR

A R T I C L E I N F O Lean implementation barriers, machine tool sector, ISM, IRP Received 18 June 2014 Accepted 04 August 2014 Available online 1 December 2014 Acute global competition has forced organization to adopt Lean manufacturing strategy in order to improve competitive potential. Top managements should examine the barriers to lean in order to ensure its effective implementation. This paper aims to analyze the barriers to implementing lean manufacturing practices based on the investigation of machine tool industry in the National Capital Region of India. Two distinct modeling approaches namely Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) and Interpretive Ranking Process (IRP) have been employed to examine the contextual relationship among the lean implementation barriers, and to rank them with reference to key performance areas, respectively. Lean implementation barriers and performance indicators were identified through literature review and opinion of experts from industry and academia. ISM methodology is used to understand the mutual influences among the lean barriers and then classify these barriers on the basis of their driving and dependence powers. As is obvious, the barriers with high driving power and dependency need more attention than the others. Development of a structural model for barriers to lean implementation can be considered as one of the major contribution of this study. The novel IRP methodology is used to examine the dominance relationship and ranks the barriers with respect to key performance indicators related to the machine tool industry. ________________________________ * Corresponding Author VIKRAM SHARMA, AMIT RAI DIXIT, MOHAMMAD ASIM QADRI/ International Journal of Lean Thinking Volume 5, Issue 1(December 2014)

[1]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  A study of enablers of agile manufacturing , 2009 .

[2]  P. Parthiban,et al.  A strategic model using structural equation modeling and fuzzy logic in supplier selection , 2011, Expert Syst. Appl..

[3]  Sushil,et al.  Analysis of critical success factors of world-class manufacturing practices: an application of interpretative structural modelling and interpretative ranking process , 2012 .

[4]  Shaligram Pokharel,et al.  A hybrid approach using ISM and fuzzy TOPSIS for the selection of reverse logistics provider , 2009 .

[5]  R. Shankar,et al.  An interpretive structural modeling of knowledge management in engineering industries , 2003 .

[6]  Ravi Shankar,et al.  Modeling the enablers of Six Sigma using interpreting structural modeling , 2010 .

[7]  Sanjay Bhasin,et al.  Prominent obstacles to lean , 2012 .

[8]  Hendrik Van Landeghem,et al.  CHALLENGES AND SUCCESS FACTORS FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF LEAN MANUFACTURING IN EUROPEAN SMES , 2011 .

[9]  R. Kant,et al.  Knowledge management barriers: An interpretive structural modeling approach , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management.

[10]  Richard H. Watson,et al.  Interpretive structural modeling—A useful tool for technology assessment? , 1978 .

[11]  A. Graves,et al.  Implementing Lean in aerospace-challenging the assumptions and understanding the challenges , 2003 .

[12]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  An analysis of the drivers affecting the implementation of green supply chain management , 2011 .

[13]  P. V. Mohanram,et al.  A survey on lean practices in Indian machine tool industries , 2011 .

[14]  Ravi Shankar,et al.  An ISM approach for modelling the enablers of flexible manufacturing system: the case for India , 2008 .

[15]  S. G. Deshmukh,et al.  Analyzing the interaction of critical factors of supplier development using Interpretive Structural Modeling—an empirical study , 2009 .

[16]  John N. Warfield,et al.  Developing Interconnection Matrices in Structural Modeling , 1974, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[17]  M. Qureshi,et al.  An integrated model to identify and classify the key criteria and their role in the assessment of 3PL services providers , 2008 .

[18]  Sushil Interpretive Ranking Process , 2009 .

[19]  S. K. Sharma,et al.  Analysis of Barriers for Reverse Logistics: An Indian Perspective , 2011 .

[20]  S. Deshmukh,et al.  Modelling of critical success factors for implementation of AMTs , 2007 .

[21]  S. G. Deshmukh,et al.  Development of a balanced scorecard , 2006 .

[22]  Sha'ri Mohd Yusof,et al.  Lean manufacturing implementation in Malaysian automotive components manufacturer: A case study , 2011, WCE 2011.

[23]  P. K. Mishra,et al.  MODELING OF INFORMATION SHARING ENABLERS FOR BUILDING TRUST IN INDIAN MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY: AN INTEGRATED ISM AND FUZZY MICMAC APPROACH , 2010 .

[24]  Ravi Shankar,et al.  IT-enablement of supply chains: understanding the barriers , 2005, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[25]  K. Govindan,et al.  Analysis of third party reverse logistics provider using interpretive structural modeling , 2012 .

[26]  Mehdi Abbasi,et al.  Determination of manufacturing strategy using interpretive structural modeling , 2012 .

[27]  O. P. Kaushal,et al.  Modelling the barriers of Six Sigma using interpretive structural modelling , 2011 .

[28]  Taiichi Ohno,et al.  The Barriers to SMEs ’ Implementation of Lean Production and Countermeasures — — Based on SMEs in Wenzhou , 2014 .

[29]  P. Garengo,et al.  Lean manufacturing in developing countries: evidence from Indian SMEs , 2012 .

[30]  S. G. Deshmukh,et al.  Selection of Third-Party Logistics (3PL): A Hybrid Approach Using Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) and Analytic Network Process (ANP) , 2005 .

[31]  Vinod Kumar,et al.  Barriers to implement green supply chain management in automobile industry using interpretive structural modeling technique: An Indian perspective , 2011 .

[32]  Faisal Talib,et al.  Analysis of interaction among the barriers to total quality management implementation using interpretive structural modeling approach , 2011 .

[33]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Evaluating Environmentally Conscious Manufacturing Barriers With Interpretive Structural Modeling , 2006 .

[34]  S. Deshmukh,et al.  Vendor Selection Using Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) , 1994 .

[35]  Ravi Shankar,et al.  Modeling the barriers of supply chain collaboration , 2010 .

[36]  AMY H. I. LEE,et al.  An Integrated Interpretive Structural Modeling-Fuzzy analytic Network Process-Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risks Model for Selecting Technologies , 2011, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[37]  Sushil INTERPRETIVE MATRIX: A TOOL TO AID INTERPRETATION OF MANAGEMENT AND SOCIAL RESEARCH , 2005 .

[38]  S. Deshmukh,et al.  Interpretive structural modelling of factors for improving competitiveness of SMEs , 2007 .

[39]  S. G. Deshmukh,et al.  Interpretive structural modeling (ISM) of IT-enablers for Indian manufacturing SMEs , 2008, Inf. Manag. Comput. Secur..

[40]  Ana Valentinova Kovacheva,et al.  Challenges in Lean implementation Successful transformation towards Lean enterprise , 2010 .

[41]  Kannan Govindan,et al.  Analyzing supplier development criteria for an automobile industry , 2010, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[42]  Harwinder Singh,et al.  An Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) approach for Advanced Manufacturing Technologies (AMTs) utilisation barriers , 2011 .

[43]  Juho Hahm,et al.  A systematic approach to business process reengineering , 1994 .

[44]  J. Garza‐Reyes,et al.  An empirical-exploratory study of the status of lean manufacturing in India , 2012 .

[45]  George G. Lendaris,et al.  The use of structural modeling for technology assessment , 1979 .

[46]  Hans-Christian Pfohl,et al.  Interpretive structural modeling of supply chain risks , 2011 .