Independency of Functional Connectivity States on Spatiotemporal Resolution of fMRI Data

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is widely used to explore the brain because of its high temporal and spatial resolution. Resting-state fMRI data were studied by many researchers who found the existence of dynamic functional connectivity (dFC). However, it is unclear whether estimation of functional connectivity (FC) states is dependent on temporal and spatial resolution of sampling in fMRI data. In this paper, we addressed this concern by comparing the FC states with varying spatiotemporal resolution of data where different number of regions of interest (ROIs) were randomly chosen to extract the timecourses. These timecourses were then down-sampling to different temporal resolution. Finally, a sliding-window approach was used to estimate the potential FC states in resting-state dFC. The results show that the detection of brain connectivity is insensitive to the spatial and temporal resolution of sampled data in fMRI data, which provides a dimension reduction perspective for research based on fMRI data.

[1]  Yeung Sam Hung,et al.  Adaptive window selection in estimating dynamic functional connectivity of resting-state fMRI , 2013, 2013 9th International Conference on Information, Communications & Signal Processing.

[2]  Eswar Damaraju,et al.  Tracking whole-brain connectivity dynamics in the resting state. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[4]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  Can sliding-window correlations reveal dynamic functional connectivity in resting-state fMRI? , 2016, NeuroImage.

[5]  Wei Gao,et al.  Task‐related modulation of functional connectivity variability and its behavioral correlations , 2015, Human brain mapping.

[6]  Lawrence K. Saul,et al.  Think Globally, Fit Locally: Unsupervised Learning of Low Dimensional Manifold , 2003, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[7]  Aaron Kucyi,et al.  Dynamic functional connectivity of the default mode network tracks daydreaming , 2014, NeuroImage.

[8]  Derek Anderson,et al.  Spectral Unmixing Cluster Validity Index for Multiple Sets of Endmembers , 2012, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[9]  Lubin Wang,et al.  Changes in functional connectivity dynamics associated with vigilance network in taxi drivers , 2016, NeuroImage.

[10]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Whole-brain anatomical networks: Does the choice of nodes matter? , 2010, NeuroImage.

[11]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  The Human Connectome: A Structural Description of the Human Brain , 2005, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[12]  J. Morton,et al.  Tracking the Brain's Functional Coupling Dynamics over Development , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Dimitri Van De Ville,et al.  On spurious and real fluctuations of dynamic functional connectivity during rest , 2015, NeuroImage.

[14]  H E Stanley,et al.  Classes of small-world networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Yong-Sheng Chen,et al.  Manifold decoding for neural representations of face viewpoint and gaze direction using magnetoencephalographic data , 2018, Human brain mapping.