Ocean Modeling on a Mesh With Resolution Following the Local Rossby Radius

We discuss the performance of the Finite Element Ocean Model (FESOM) on locally eddy-resolving global unstructured meshes. In particular, the utility of the mesh design approach whereby mesh horizontal resolution is varied as half the Rossby radius in most of the model domain is explored. Model simulations on such a mesh (FESOM-XR) are compared with FESOM simulations on a smaller-size mesh, where refinement depends only on the pattern of observed variability (FESOM-HR). We also compare FESOM results to a simulation of the ocean model of the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology (MPIOM) on a tripolar regular grid with refinement toward the poles, which uses a number of degrees of freedom similar to FESOM-XR. The mesh design strategy, which relies on the Rossby radius and/or the observed variability pattern, tends to coarsen the resolution in tropical and partly subtropical latitudes compared to the regular MPIOM grid. Excessive variations of mesh resolution are found to affect the performance in other nearby areas, presumably through dissipation that increases if resolution is coarsened. The largest improvement shown by FESOM-XR is a reduction of the surface temperature bias in the so-called North-West corner of the North Atlantic Ocean where horizontal resolution was increased dramatically. However, other biases in FESOM-XR remain largely unchanged compared to FESOM-HR. We conclude that resolving the Rossby radius alone (with two points per Rossby radius) is insufficient, and that careful use of a priori information on eddy dynamics is required to exploit the full potential of ocean models on unstructured meshes.

[1]  Katja Lohmann,et al.  Characteristics of the ocean simulations in the Max Planck Institute Ocean Model (MPIOM) the ocean component of the MPI‐Earth system model , 2013 .

[2]  Romain Bourdallé-Badie,et al.  The impact of resolving the Rossby radius at mid-latitudes in the ocean: results from a high-resolution version of the Met Office GC2 coupled model , 2016 .

[3]  Jens Schröter,et al.  A finite-element ocean model: principles and evaluation , 2004 .

[4]  Frank O. Bryan,et al.  A prototype two-decade fully-coupled fine-resolution CCSM simulation , 2010 .

[5]  J. Schröter,et al.  Towards multi-resolution global climate modeling with ECHAM6–FESOM. Part I: model formulation and mean climate , 2015, Climate Dynamics.

[6]  Mojib Latif,et al.  The Max-Planck-Institute global ocean/sea ice model with orthogonal curvilinear coordinates , 2003 .

[7]  S. Hagemann,et al.  Regionally coupled atmosphere‐ocean‐sea ice‐marine biogeochemistry model ROM: 1. Description and validation , 2015 .

[8]  T. Semmler,et al.  Towards multi-resolution global climate modeling with ECHAM6-FESOM. Part II: climate variability , 2013, Climate Dynamics.

[9]  Hongmei Li,et al.  On the fluctuating buoyancy fluxes simulated in a 1/10° OGCM , 2013 .

[10]  R. Hill,et al.  Description and evaluation , 1976 .

[11]  P. L. Traon,et al.  AN IMPROVED MAPPING METHOD OF MULTISATELLITE ALTIMETER DATA , 1998 .

[12]  P. Gent,et al.  Isopycnal mixing in ocean circulation models , 1990 .

[13]  Christopher C. Pain,et al.  Unstructured adaptive meshes for ocean modeling , 2013 .

[14]  Helene T. Hewitt,et al.  Impact of ocean resolution on coupled air‐sea fluxes and large‐scale climate , 2016 .

[15]  Robert Hallberg,et al.  Using a resolution function to regulate parameterizations of oceanic mesoscale eddy effects , 2013 .

[16]  R. Reynolds,et al.  The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project , 1996, Renewable Energy.

[17]  Yves Soufflet,et al.  Effective resolution in ocean models , 2014 .

[18]  Shoshiro Minobe,et al.  The Gulf Stream influence on wintertime North Atlantic jet variability , 2017 .

[19]  S. Danilov,et al.  Resolving eddies by local mesh refinement , 2015 .

[20]  Hiroyasu Hasumi,et al.  Ocean modeling in an eddying regime , 2008 .

[21]  Michael Steele,et al.  PHC: A Global Ocean Hydrography with a High-Quality Arctic Ocean , 2001 .

[22]  Gilles Reverdin,et al.  Global high-resolution mapping of ocean circulation from TOPEX/Poseidon and ERS-1 and -2 , 2000 .

[23]  Philip W. Jones,et al.  A multi-resolution approach to global ocean modeling , 2013 .

[24]  Masaki Satoh,et al.  High Resolution Model Intercomparison Project (HighResMIP) , 2016 .

[25]  M. Carnes Description and Evaluation of GDEM-V 3.0 , 2009 .

[26]  Chris Harris,et al.  Improved Atlantic winter blocking in a climate model , 2011 .

[27]  Carsten Eden,et al.  An estimate of Lorenz energy cycle for the world ocean based on the 1/10º STORM/NCEP simulation , 2012 .

[28]  T. Ezer Revisiting the problem of the Gulf Stream separation: on the representation of topography in ocean models with different types of vertical grids , 2016 .

[29]  D. Lawrence,et al.  A new synoptic scale resolving global climate simulation using the Community Earth System Model , 2014 .

[30]  Andrew T. Wittenberg,et al.  Impacts on Ocean Heat from Transient Mesoscale Eddies in a Hierarchy of Climate Models , 2015 .

[31]  Qiang Wang,et al.  Designing variable ocean model resolution based on the observed ocean variability , 2016 .

[32]  Jens Schröter,et al.  The Finite Element Sea Ice-Ocean Model (FESOM) v.1.4: formulation of an ocean general circulation model , 2014 .

[33]  Stuart A. Cunningham,et al.  The North Atlantic subpolar circulation in an eddy-resolving global ocean model , 2015 .

[34]  Naomi Naik,et al.  Is the Gulf Stream responsible for Europe's mild winters? , 2002 .

[35]  Stephen G. Yeager,et al.  The global climatology of an interannually varying air–sea flux data set , 2009 .