A comparative analysis reveals weak relationships between ecological factors and beta diversity of stream insect metacommunities at two spatial levels

The hypotheses that beta diversity should increase with decreasing latitude and increase with spatial extent of a region have rarely been tested based on a comparative analysis of multiple datasets, and no such study has focused on stream insects. We first assessed how well variability in beta diversity of stream insect metacommunities is predicted by insect group, latitude, spatial extent, altitudinal range, and dataset properties across multiple drainage basins throughout the world. Second, we assessed the relative roles of environmental and spatial factors in driving variation in assemblage composition within each drainage basin. Our analyses were based on a dataset of 95 stream insect metacommunities from 31 drainage basins distributed around the world. We used dissimilarity-based indices to quantify beta diversity for each metacommunity and, subsequently, regressed beta diversity on insect group, latitude, spatial extent, altitudinal range, and dataset properties (e.g., number of sites and percentage of presences). Within each metacommunity, we used a combination of spatial eigenfunction analyses and partial redundancy analysis to partition variation in assemblage structure into environmental, shared, spatial, and unexplained fractions. We found that dataset properties were more important predictors of beta diversity than ecological and geographical factors across multiple drainage basins. In the within-basin analyses, environmental and spatial variables were generally poor predictors of variation in assemblage composition. Our results revealed deviation from general biodiversity patterns because beta diversity did not show the expected decreasing trend with latitude. Our results also call for reconsideration of just how predictable stream assemblages are along ecological gradients, with implications for environmental assessment and conservation decisions. Our findings may also be applicable to other dynamic systems where predictability is low.

[1]  B. Malmqvist.  Aquatic invertebrates in riverine landscapes , 2002 .

[2]  D. Dudgeon,et al.  Scales of spatiotemporal variability in macroinvertebrate abundance and diversity in monsoonal streams: detecting environmental change , 2011 .

[3]  F. Altermatt,et al.  River network properties shape α‐diversity and community similarity patterns of aquatic insect communities across major drainage basins , 2013 .

[4]  Arthur V. Brown,et al.  The Role of Disturbance in Stream Ecology , 1988, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[5]  M. Graça,et al.  Global distribution of a key trophic guild contrasts with common latitudinal diversity patterns. , 2011, Ecology.

[6]  L. M. Bini,et al.  Common and rare species respond to similar niche processes in macroinvertebrate metacommunities , 2012 .

[7]  Sylvain Dolédec,et al.  Spatial autocorrelation patterns of stream invertebrates: exogenous and endogenous factors , 2012 .

[8]  J. Simaika,et al.  Comparative assessment of indices of freshwater habitat conditions using different invertebrate taxon sets , 2011 .

[9]  R. Pearson,et al.  Gradients in regional diversity of freshwater taxa , 2009, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[10]  J. Heino,et al.  Reconceptualising the beta diversity‐environmental heterogeneity relationship in running water systems , 2015 .

[11]  T. Rangel,et al.  Environmental drivers of beta‐diversity patterns in New‐World birds and mammals , 2009 .

[12]  C. Hawkins,et al.  Broad‐scale geographical patterns in local stream insect genera richness , 2003 .

[13]  R. Naiman,et al.  Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges , 2006, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[14]  W. Fisher.  Stream Ecology: Structure and Function of Running Waters , 1995 .

[15]  P. Legendre,et al.  vegan : Community Ecology Package. R package version 1.8-5 , 2007 .

[16]  Monica Granados,et al.  Rising complexity and falling explanatory power in ecology , 2014 .

[17]  Marti J. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate dispersion as a measure of beta diversity. , 2006, Ecology letters.

[18]  J. Heino.  The importance of metacommunity ecology for environmental assessment research in the freshwater realm , 2013, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[19]  Taxonomic chauvinism threatens the future of entomology , 2009 .

[20]  J. David Allan,et al.  Stream Ecology , 1995, Springer Netherlands.

[21]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[22]  C. Townsend,et al.  A truce with neutral theory: local deterministic factors, species traits and dispersal limitation together determine patterns of diversity in stream invertebrates. , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[23]  L. Paasivirta,et al.  Non-biting midges in biodiversity conservation and environmental assessment: Findings from boreal freshwater ecosystems , 2011 .

[24]  D. Angeler,et al.  Tracing alpha, beta, and gamma diversity responses to environmental change in boreal lakes , 2013, Oecologia.

[25]  P. Legendre,et al.  Variation partitioning of species data matrices: estimation and comparison of fractions. , 2006, Ecology.

[26]  Karl Cottenie,et al.  Integrating environmental and spatial processes in ecological community dynamics. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[27]  J. Heino.  A macroecological perspective of diversity patterns in the freshwater realm , 2011 .

[28]  G. C. Stevens.  The Latitudinal Gradient in Geographical Range: How so Many Species Coexist in the Tropics , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[29]  P. Peres‐Neto,et al.  The role of environmental and spatial processes in structuring lake communities from bacteria to fish. , 2006, Ecology.

[30]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology , 2004 .

[31]  C. Swan,et al.  Dendritic network structure constrains metacommunity properties in riverine ecosystems. , 2010, The Journal of animal ecology.

[32]  O. Dangles,et al.  Biodiversity under threat in glacier-fed river systems , 2012 .

[33]  J. Ward.  RIVERINE LANDSCAPES: BIODIVERSITY PATTERNS, DISTURBANCE REGIMES, AND AQUATIC CONSERVATION , 1998 .

[34]  Pedro R. Peres-Neto,et al.  Quantifying and disentangling dispersal in metacommunities: how close have we come? How far is there to go? , 2010, Landscape Ecology.

[35]  Pierre Legendre,et al.  Estimating and controlling for spatial structure in the study of ecological communities , 2010 .

[36]  McIntosh,et al.  Disturbance, resource supply, and food-web architecture in streams , 1998 .

[37]  José Alexandre Felizola Diniz-Filho,et al.  Macroecological explanations for differences in species richness gradients: a canonical analysis of South American birds , 2004 .

[38]  S. R. Searle,et al.  Applied Linear Regression Models, 2nd edition , 2016 .

[39]  Helmut Hillebrand,et al.  Empirical approaches to metacommunities: a review and comparison with theory. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[40]  L. Leemis.  Applied Linear Regression Models , 1991 .

[41]  J. Neter,et al.  Applied Linear Regression Models , 1983 .

[42]  J. Heino,et al.  Metacommunity organisation, spatial extent and dispersal in aquatic systems: patterns, processes and prospects , 2015 .

[43]  James C. Stegen,et al.  PERSPECTIVE Navigating the multiple meanings of b diversity: a roadmap for the practicing ecologist , 2010 .

[44]  J. Heino,et al.  Control of stream insect assemblages: roles of spatial configuration and local environmental factors , 2008 .

[45]  L. Paasivirta,et al.  Environmental heterogeneity and &bgr; diversity of stream macroinvertebrate communities at intermediate spatial scales , 2012, Freshwater Science.

[46]  J. Heino,et al.  Nutrient enrichment is related to two facets of beta diversity for stream invertebrates across the United States. , 2014, Ecology.

[47]  A. Baselga.  Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity , 2010 .

[48]  Colin R. Townsend,et al.  The Patch Dynamics Concept of Stream Community Ecology , 1989, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[49]  J. Diniz‐Filho,et al.  Beyond Rapoport's rule: evaluating range size patterns of New World birds in a two‐dimensional framework , 2006 .

[50]  T. Erős,et al.  Temporal variability in the spatial and environmental determinants of functional metacommunity organization - stream fish in a human-modified landscape , 2012 .

[51]  N. Poff,et al.  Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: a literature review to inform the science and management of environmental flows , 2010 .

[52]  G. Monette,et al.  Generalized Collinearity Diagnostics , 1992 .

[53]  P. Legendre,et al.  Forward selection of explanatory variables. , 2008, Ecology.

[54]  Frode Ødegaard,et al.  A multiple-site similarity measure , 2007, Biology Letters.

[55]  D. Angeler,et al.  Metacommunity structure in a small boreal stream network. , 2013, The Journal of animal ecology.

[56]  津田 松苗.  Aquatic entomology , 2007 .

[57]  J. Heino.  Positive relationship between regional distribution and local abundance in stream insects: a consequence of niche breadth or niche position? , 2005 .

[58]  Florian Altermatt,et al.  Diversity in riverine metacommunities: a network perspective , 2013, Aquatic Ecology.

[59]  A. H. Ahmad,et al.  Biodiversity of stream insects in the Malaysian Peninsula: spatial patterns and environmental constraints , 2013 .

[60]  O. Dangles,et al.  Environmental harshness and global richness patterns in glacier-fed streams , 2012 .

[61]  J. Nabout,et al.  No evidence for environmental and spatial processes in structuring phytoplankton communities , 2009 .

[62]  J. Heino,et al.  Spatial extent, regional specificity and metacommunity structuring in lake macrophytes , 2013 .

[63]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[64]  J. Heino,et al.  Drivers of beta diversity of macroinvertebrate communities in tropical forest streams , 2013 .

[65]  A. Baur.  [Rezension von] T. Caro,Conservation by proxy: Indicator, umbrella, keystone, flagship, and other surrogate species , 2011 .

[66]  D. Auerbach,et al.  Metacommunity theory as a multispecies, multiscale framework for studying the influence of river network structure on riverine communities and ecosystems , 2011, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[67]  M. Luoto,et al.  Stochastic species distributions are driven by organism size. , 2013, Ecology.

[68]  Dénes Schmera,et al.  A new conceptual and methodological framework for exploring and explaining pattern in presence – absence data , 2011 .

[69]  P. McIntyre,et al.  Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity , 2010, Nature.

[70]  L. Barmuta,et al.  Global patterns of stream detritivore distribution: implications for biodiversity loss in changing climates , 2012 .

[71]  Donald A. Jackson,et al.  What controls who is where in freshwater fish communities the roles of biotic, abiotic, and spatial factors , 2001 .

[72]  Pierre Legendre,et al.  All-scale spatial analysis of ecological data by means of principal coordinates of neighbour matrices , 2002 .

[73]  P. Adler,et al.  Diversity, distribution and larval habitats of North Swedish blackflies (Diptera: Simuliidae) , 1999 .

[74]  Jonathan M. Chase,et al.  Navigating the multiple meanings of β diversity: a roadmap for the practicing ecologist. , 2011, Ecology letters.

[75]  P. White,et al.  The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology , 1999 .

[76]  D. M. Rosenberg,et al.  Freshwater biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates. , 1994 .

[77]  Daniel J. McGarvey.  Moving Beyond Species—Discharge Relationships to a Flow-Mediated, Macroecological Theory of Fish Species Richness , 2014, Freshwater Science.

[78]  L. M. Bini,et al.  The roles of dispersal limitation and environmental conditions in controlling caddisfly (Trichoptera) assemblages , 2012 .

[79]  Tadeu Siqueira,et al.  Metacommunity structuring in stream networks: roles of dispersal mode, distance type, and regional environmental context , 2013, Ecology and evolution.

[80]  P. Legendre,et al.  ANALYZING BETA DIVERSITY: PARTITIONING THE SPATIAL VARIATION OF COMMUNITY COMPOSITION DATA , 2005 .

[81]  B. Peckarsky,et al.  Integrating behavioral, population and large-scale approaches for understanding stream insect communities. , 2014, Current opinion in insect science.

[82]  Robert I. McDonald,et al.  The distance decay of similarity in ecological communities , 2007 .