Stereotype threat, identity salience, and spatial reasoning

Stereotype threat research provides insight into how the low standardized test scores of students from stigmatized social groups may derive in part from the negative performance expectations about these groups. Because these students belong to many social groups, one means of mitigating the threat is to remind them of their membership in groups for which there are positive performance expectations. We tested this hypothesis by priming different social identities among undergraduates prior to administering a standardized test of spatial reasoning, the Vandenberg Mental Rotation Test. We found that females who were primed to contemplate their identity as students at a selective private college performed better than those who were primed to contemplate their sex or a test-irrelevant identity. For males, priming their sex increased performance relative to the test-irrelevant or private college student primes. These results demonstrate the potential of reminding students of their achieved identities (e.g., private college student) in an effort to subdue evaluation apprehension created by negative stereotypes about their ascribed identities, such as being female in the case of spatial abilities.

[1]  David C. Geary,et al.  Sexual selection and sex differences in mathematical abilities , 1996, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[2]  Marcia Barinaga Surprises Across the Cultural Divide , 1994, Science.

[3]  M. Levitt,et al.  Convoys of social support in childhood and early adolescence: Structure and function. , 1993 .

[4]  B. Newman,et al.  Group Identity and Alienation: Giving the We Its Due , 2001 .

[5]  Ronald F. Ferguson Can schools narrow the Black–White test score gap? , 1998 .

[6]  Ryan P. Brown,et al.  Stigma on my mind: Individual differences in the experience of stereotype threat , 2003 .

[7]  M. Linn,et al.  Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: a meta-analysis. , 1985, Child development.

[8]  M. Hegarty,et al.  A dissociation between mental rotation and perspective-taking spatial abilities , 2004 .

[9]  S. Spencer,et al.  Stereotype Threat and Women's Math Performance , 1999 .

[10]  M. S. Masters,et al.  Is the gender difference in mental rotation disappearing? , 1993, Behavior genetics.

[11]  R. Bigler,et al.  Social categorization and the formation of intergroup attitudes in children. , 1997, Child development.

[12]  A. Waterman,et al.  Identity Development From Adolescence to Adulthood: An Extension of Theory and a Review of Research , 1982 .

[13]  R. Montemayor,et al.  Adolescent Identity Formation , 1992 .

[14]  Claude M. Steele,et al.  Stereotypes and the fragility of academic competence, motivation, and self-concept , 2005 .

[15]  David C. Geary,et al.  Sexual selection and sex differences in spatial cognition , 1995 .

[16]  K. Schaie,et al.  Gender differences in spatial ability in old age: Longitudinal and intervention findings , 1988 .

[17]  R. Shepard,et al.  Mental Rotation of Three-Dimensional Objects , 1971, Science.

[18]  C. Stangor,et al.  Prejudice : the target's perspective , 1999 .

[19]  Joshua Aronson,et al.  Stereotype threat and the academic underperformance of minorities and women. , 1998 .

[20]  C. Jencks,et al.  The Black-White Test Score Gap. , 1998 .

[21]  Gilah C. Leder,et al.  Mathematics and Gender , 2021, The Joy of Mathematics.

[22]  J. Demos,et al.  Adolescence in Historical Perspective. , 1969 .

[23]  I. Sigel,et al.  HANDBOOK OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY , 2006 .

[24]  C. Steele,et al.  Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  S. Spencer,et al.  Clearing the air: identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women's leadership aspirations. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  W J Qubeck,et al.  Mean Differences among Subcomponents of Vandenberg's Mental Rotation Test , 1997, Perceptual and motor skills.

[27]  N. Ambady,et al.  Stereotype Susceptibility: Identity Salience and Shifts in Quantitative Performance , 1999 .

[28]  Michael Inzlicht,et al.  A Threatening Intellectual Environment: Why Females Are Susceptible to Experiencing Problem-Solving Deficits in the Presence of Males , 2000, Psychological science.

[29]  Michael Inzlicht,et al.  Arousal and stereotype threat , 2005 .

[30]  Stephen M Kosslyn,et al.  The relationship of male testosterone to components of mental rotation , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  S. Vandenberg,et al.  Mental Rotations, a Group Test of Three-Dimensional Spatial Visualization , 1978, Perceptual and motor skills.

[32]  Margaret Shih,et al.  Stereotype Susceptibility in Children: Effects of Identity Activation on Quantitative Performance , 2001, Psychological science.

[33]  James C. Kaufman,et al.  Gender Differences in Mathematics: An Integrative Psychological Approach , 2005 .

[34]  C. Macrae,et al.  Stereotype activation and inhibition: Advances in Social Cognition, Volume XI , 1998 .

[35]  Catherine Good,et al.  When White Men Can't Do Math: Necessary and Sufficient Factors in Stereotype Threat , 1999 .

[36]  M. Inzlicht,et al.  Do High-Achieving Female Students Underperform in Private? The Implications of Threatening Environments on Intellectual Processing , 2003 .

[37]  Tun Hussein,et al.  Effect of Instructions on Spatial Visualisation Ability in Civil Engineering Students , 2002 .

[38]  J. Marcia Development and validation of ego-identity status. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[39]  F. Aboud Children and prejudice , 1988 .

[40]  Richard De Lisi,et al.  Biology, society, and behavior : the development of sex differences in cognition , 2002 .