FACTORS AFFECTING E-GOVERNMENT IMPLEMENTATION AND ADOPTION IN THE STATE OF QATAR

Acknowledgement, Table of Content and Abbreviation Shafi Al-Shafi i PhD Abstract Electronic government (e-government) has established as an effective mechanism for increasing government productivity and efficiency and a key enabler of citizen centric services. However, e-government implementation is surrounded by organisational, technological, political and social issues, which have to be considered and treated carefully in order to facilitate this change. Conversely, from an adoption perspective, e-government services are yet to be universally accepted as a medium for accessing online public services since its inception more than a decade ago. In terms of prior research into understanding the implementation challenges and adoption factors, most existing literature focus into either the implementation context or adoption context separately and no research studies were found that take a holistic viewpoint of both implementation and adoption. Furthermore, only a few researchers have explored and reflected on the important factors that can impact egovernment implementation using well founded theoretical models or frameworks. Besides, there is no universal model for e-government implementation and adoption that is applicable for all countries to ensure success, especially for developing and Gulf Cooperation Countries (GCC). Therefore, this thesis attempts to explore and investigate the key challenges that influence e-government implementation and the factors influencing citizen adoption in the state of Qatar. By simultaneously analysing and aligning the implementation issues of e -government with the adoption aspects, this study aimed to develop a better understanding of the gaps that exists between implementation and adoption. Through combining the implementation and adoption aspects of e-government, this thesis proposes a unified conceptual model which could be used as a frame of reference by government institutions that seek to implement and diffuse e-government systems in Qatar. To do so, the research draws from two well established theoretical models, Institutional Theory (for understanding implementation) and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model (for understanding adoption). The research adopted a multi-method approach [combining qualitative (interviews) and quantitative (survey) methods] to explore practices and experiences of implementing and adopting e-government systems in the State of Qatar. Abstract, Acknowledgement, Table of Content and Abbreviation Acknowledgement, Table of Content and Abbreviation Shafi Al-Shafi ii Acknowledgements Praise to Allah the Almighty, Creator and Sustainers of the Universe, and prayers and blessings are sent on His Prophet. Firstly, I would like to express my deepest gratitude and appreciation to Dr. Vishanth Weerakkody, my academic first supervisor, for h is excellent supervision, guidance, invaluable feedback, and encouragement. Thank you very much Vishanth. I greatly appreciate my thesis second supervisor, Professor Guy Fitzgerald for his constructive feedback, generous time, kind support, and advice duri ng my PhD. Thanks a lot Guy. I would like to extend my thanks to H.E. Sheikh Abdullah Bin Nasser Bin Khalifa Al-Thani, Minister of State for Interior Affairs that provide support, and encouragement for my doctoral studies. Also, many thanks to the defence attache and cultural attache, and the embassy staff in London. Additionally, many thanks to Ms Ella Heaney (PhD Administrator) for her continuous help. Furthermore, a huge thanks to Mrs Carolyn Bailey (Academic Research Manager) for her assistance in editing the thesis. Moreover, many thanks to all staff of the Department of Information Systems and Computing (DISC) and Business school for their kind support during my PhD study. I acknowledge the organisations that participated in this research and their sta ff, and for their time and assistance in collecting empirical data to ensure the completion of the thesis. My greatest indebtedness is to my wife, and I can not find adequate words to express how essential her inspiration and support were to bring me to th is point. I would not be here if it was not for her patience, continuous encouragement and thoughtful advice during my work. Also, I owe special thanks to my mother, my daughters, my sons, my brothers and sisters, and my relatives for their moral support, continuous prayers, and endless patience. Lastly, I extend the thanks to all my colleagues at the Department of Information Systems and Computing, Business school, and other Brunel schools and departments for their continuous encouragement and support, as well as many thanks to all my friends and colleagues for their time, advice and continuous support. Abstract, Acknowledgement, Table of Content and Abbreviation Acknowledgement, Table of Content and Abbreviation Shafi Al-Shafi iii Declaration Some of the material contained herein has been presented in the form of the following publications: Journal Papers Published/Accepted (In-Press)/Under Review [J5] Al-Shafi, S. and Weerakkody, V. (2010) Conceptual Model for EGovernment Implementation in the State of Qatar. International Journal of Public Sector Management , Emerald, (Submitted). [J4] Al-Shafi, S. and Weerakkody, V. (2009) E-government Adoption in Qatar: Investigating the Citizens‘ Perspective . Journal of Computer Information Systems (Submitted). [J3] Al-Shafi, S. and Weerakkody, V. (2009) Implementing Free Wi-Fi in Public Parks: An Empirical Study in Qatar. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 5(3), 21-35, July-September 2009. [J2] Al-Shafi, S. (2008) Free Wireless Internet park Services: An Investigation of Technology Adoption in Qatar from a Citizens‘ Perspective. Journal of Cases on Information Technology, 10, 21-34. [J1] Al-Shafi, S. and Weerakkody, V. (2007) Implementing and managing egovernment in the State of Qatar: a citizens' perspective. Electronic Government, an International Journal, 4(4), 436-450. Conference Papers Published/Accepted for Publication [C8] Al-Shafi, S., Weerakkody, V., Lee, H. and Irani, Z. (2009) EGovernment Adoption in Qatar: Investigating the Citizens‘ Perspective. Pre-ICIS Workshop paper, Special Interest Group on Adoption and Diffusion of Information Technology (SIGADIT) in the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2009) , Phoenix, Arizona, December 15 18, 2009 (Accepted). [C7] Al-Shafi, S., Weerakkody, V. , and Janssen, M. (2009). Investigating the Adoption of E-government Services in Qatar Using the UTAUT Model. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 15th Americas Abstract, Acknowledgement, Table of Content and Abbreviation Acknowledgement, Table of Content and Abbreviation Shafi Al-Shafi iv Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS2009), San Francisco, California, August 6 9, 2009, [CD-Proceedings]. [C6] AlSobhi, F. and Al-Shafi, S. (2009) Citizens‘ Acceptance Of EGovernment Services: An Empirical Study Of Medina City. Poster paper presented at the Proceedings of the 15th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS2009), San Francisco, California, August 6 9, 2009, [CD-Proceedings]. [C5] Al-Shafi, S. and Weerakkody, V. (2009) Understanding Citizens‘ Behavioural intention in the Adoption of E-government Services in the State of Qatar. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS2009), Verona, Italy. [CD-Proceedings]. [C4] Al-Shafi, S. and Weerakkody, V. (2008) The Use Of Wireless Internet Parks To Facilitate Adoption And Diffusion Of E-Government Services: An Empirical Study In Qatar. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 14th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS 2008) Toronto, Ontario, [CD-Proceedings]. [C3] Al-Shafi, S. and Weerakkody, V. (2008) Adoption of wireless internet parks: an empirical Study in Qatar. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the European and Mediterranean Conference on Information systems (EMCIS08), Dubai, UAE, [CD-Proceedings]. [C2] Al-Shafi, S. and Weerakkody, V. (2007) Exploring E-government in the State of Qatar: Benefits, Challenges and Complexities. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (EMCIS07), Valencia, Spain, [CD-Proceedings]. [C1] Al-Shafi, S. and Weerakkody, V. (2007) Implementing and managing egovernment in the State of Qatar: a citizens' perspective. Paper Accepted for the UKAIS 2007 Conference, Manchester, United Kingdom. Abstract, Acknowledgement, Table of Content and Abbreviation Acknowledgement, Table of Content and Abbreviation Shafi Al-Shafi v Book Chapter Published/Accepted for Publication [BC2] Al-Shafi, S. and Weerakkody, V. (2009) Citizen‘s Acceptance of Electronic Services: A Qatari Perspective‘ . Chapter XI, EGovernment Development and Diffusion: Inhibitors and Facilitators of Digital Democracy, Information Science Reference (May, 2009). [BC1] Al-Shafi, S. and Weerakkody, V. (2009) Examining the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) of EGovernment Services within the State of Qatar‘. Chapter XXII Handbook of Research on ICT-Enabled Transformational Government: A Global Perspective. Information Science Reference (May, 2009). Abstract, Acknowledgement, Table of Content and Abbreviation Acknowledgement, Table of Content and Abbreviation Shafi Al-Shafi vi Table Of

[1]  Venkatesh,et al.  Computer Technology Training in the Workplace: A Longitudinal Investigation of the Effect of Mood. , 1999, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[2]  Vishanth Weerakkody,et al.  Implementing Free Wi-Fi in Public Parks: An Empirical Study in Qatar , 2009, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[3]  Alexandros Kaliontzoglou,et al.  A secure e-Government platform architecture for small to medium sized public organizations , 2005, Electron. Commer. Res. Appl..

[4]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[5]  A. Gunasekaran,et al.  Adoption of e-procurement in Hong Kong: An empirical research , 2008 .

[6]  F. Bélanger The Influence of Perceived Characteristics of Innovating on e-Government Adoption , 2004 .

[7]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[8]  Allen S. Lee A Scientific Methodology for MIS Case Studies , 1989, MIS Q..

[9]  R. Yin Yin, Robert K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1994. , 1994 .

[10]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[11]  Wendy L. Currie,et al.  Conflicting institutional logics: a national programme for IT in the organisational field of healthcare , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[12]  Ciaran Murphy,et al.  Shaping information and communication technologies infrastructures in the newspaper industry: cases on the role of IT competencies , 1999, ICIS.

[13]  M. J. Moon The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality? , 2002 .

[14]  H. Scholl E-government: A Special Case of ICT-enabled Business Process Change , 2003, HICSS.

[15]  W. Scott,et al.  Institutions and Organizations. , 1995 .

[16]  P. Freebody Qualitative Research in Education , 2003 .

[17]  Sharon Sorenson Introduction to Research , 2019, Fast Facts to Loving your Research Project.

[18]  H. Raghav Rao,et al.  Risk of Terrorism, Trust in Government, and e-Government Services: An Exploratory Study of Citizens’ Intention to use e Government Services in a Turbulent Environment , 2005 .

[19]  David M. Fetterman,et al.  Qualitative Approaches to Evaluation in Education: The Silent Scientific Revolution , 1988 .

[20]  John E. Dobson,et al.  Responsibility modelling as a technique for organisational requirements definition , 1994 .

[21]  Johan P. Olsen,et al.  Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics , 1989 .

[22]  Chee-Sing Yap,et al.  Business Process Reengineering in the Public Sector: The Case of the Housing Development Board in Singapore , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[24]  Vishanth Weerakkody,et al.  Understanding citizens' behavioural intention in the adoption of e-government services in the state of Qatar , 2009, ECIS.

[25]  R. H. Myers Classical and modern regression with applications , 1986 .

[26]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[27]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research , 2006 .

[28]  Keng Siau,et al.  Gaining Competitive Advantages through a Functionality Grid for Website Evaluation , 2004, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[29]  Johan P. Olsen,et al.  Elaborating the “New Institutionalism” , 2008 .

[30]  Janice M. Burn,et al.  Moving towards e‐government: a case study of organisational change processes , 2003 .

[31]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[32]  Marjan Sarshar,et al.  Quantitative and qualitative research in the built environment: application of “mixed” research approach , 2002 .

[33]  A. Bryman Social Research Methods , 2001 .

[34]  R. Coase The Nature of the Firm , 1937 .

[35]  Jyoti Choudrie,et al.  E-Government: The Need for Effective Process Management in the Public Sector , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[36]  D. Avison,et al.  Research in information systems : a handbook for research supervisors and their students , 2005 .

[37]  G. Hofstede Attitudes, Values and Organizational Culture: Disentangling the Concepts , 1998 .

[38]  Ronald Lippitt,et al.  The dynamics of planned change : a comparative study of principles and techniques , 1958 .

[39]  M. J. Moon,et al.  Linking Citizen Satisfaction with E-Government and Trust in Government , 2004 .

[40]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Transformational government: basics and key issues , 2008, ICEGOV '08.

[41]  J. Goodstein Institutional Pressures and Strategic Responsiveness: Employer Involvement in Work-Family Issues , 1994 .

[42]  Gretchen Rossman,et al.  Numbers and Words , 1985 .

[43]  Anne Morris,et al.  Factors Influencing the Adoption of E-government Services , 2009, J. Softw..

[44]  José Ramón Gil-García,et al.  Understanding the complexity of electronic government: Implications from the digital divide literature , 2005, Gov. Inf. Q..

[45]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  E-government around the world: lessons, challenges, and future directions , 2003, Gov. Inf. Q..

[46]  Tom Wengraf Qualitative Research Interviewing: Biographic Narrative and Semi-Structured Methods , 2001 .

[47]  Purnendra Jain The Catch-up State: E-government in Japan , 2002 .

[48]  T. C. Edwin Cheng,et al.  Adoption of internet banking: An empirical study in Hong Kong , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[49]  Mari Nyrhinen,et al.  IT Infrastructure: Structure, Properties and Processes , 2008 .

[50]  Neuman Social Research Methods , 2007 .

[51]  L. Elaine Halchin,et al.  Electronic government: Government capability and terrorist resource , 2004, Gov. Inf. Q..

[52]  J. Beckmann,et al.  Action control : from cognition to behavior , 1985 .

[53]  C. Demchak,et al.  Democracy and Bureaucracy in the Age of the Web , 2002 .

[54]  Mohd. Nishat Faisal,et al.  E-government in India: modelling the barriers to its adoption and diffusion , 2008, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[55]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Investigating healthcare professionals' decisions to accept telemedicine technology: an empirical test of competing theories , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[56]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  A field study of the adoption of software process innovations by information systems professionals , 2000, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[57]  Wayne Wei Huang,et al.  Successfully implementing e-government: fundamental issues and a case study in the USA , 2006, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[58]  K. Lewin,et al.  Group decision and social change. , 1999 .

[59]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  Extending the technology acceptance model: the influence of perceived user resources , 2001, DATB.

[60]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A critical assessment of potential measurement biases in the technology acceptance model: three experiments , 1996, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[61]  Roland Traunmüller,et al.  Trends in electronic government: managing distributed knowledge , 2000, Proceedings 11th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications.

[62]  J S Meister,et al.  "Participation is voluntary". , 1975, The Hastings Center report.

[63]  W. Wong,et al.  Does E‐Government Promote Accountability? A Comparative Analysis of Website Openness and Government Accountability , 2004 .

[64]  Ali M. Al-Khouri,et al.  Electronic Government in the GCC Countries , 2008 .

[65]  Yu-Che Chen,et al.  Transforming local e-government services: the use of application service providers , 2001, Gov. Inf. Q..

[66]  Siriluck Rotchanakitumnuai,et al.  Measuring e-government service value with the E-GOVSQUAL-RISK model , 2008, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[67]  Jyoti Choudrie,et al.  Realising e-government in the UK: rural and urban challenges , 2005, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[68]  Chris W. Clegg,et al.  Information technology: a study of performance and the role of human and organizational factors , 1997 .

[69]  G. Tullock,et al.  The calculus of consent : logical foundations of constitutional democracy , 1962 .

[70]  Charles Oppenheim,et al.  National Information Policy developments worldwide I: electronic government , 2002, J. Inf. Sci..

[71]  Ingoo Han,et al.  The Impact of Customer Trust and Perception of Security Control on the Acceptance of Electronic Commerce , 2003, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[72]  R. Coombs,et al.  Culture, Control and Competition; Towards a Conceptual Framework for the Study of Information Technology in Organizations , 1992 .

[73]  Subhash Bhatnagar,et al.  E-Government: From Vision to Implementation - A Practical Guide With Case Studies , 2004 .

[74]  E. Turban,et al.  Electronic Commerce: A Managerial Perspective , 1999 .

[75]  R. Fidel Are we there yet?: Mixed methods research in library and information science , 2008 .

[76]  Ralf Klischewski,et al.  Information quality as capstone in negotiating e-government integration, interoperation and information sharing , 2008, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[77]  Reggie Davidrajuh,et al.  Digital divide in Europe: assessing and comparing the e-readiness of a developed and an emerging economy in the Nordic region , 2005, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[78]  John Mingers,et al.  Combining IS Research Methods: Towards a Pluralist Methodology , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[79]  Yaobin Lu,et al.  Consumers Perceptions and Acceptances Towards Mobile Advertising: An Empirical Study in China , 2007, 2007 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing.

[80]  W. Scott,et al.  Approaching adulthood: the maturing of institutional theory , 2008 .

[81]  Valentina Ndou,et al.  E – Government for Developing Countries: Opportunities and Challenges , 2004, Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries..

[82]  Martin Watts Wages and Wage Determination in 2000 , 2001 .

[83]  W. Neuman,et al.  Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 2002 .

[84]  Liisa von Hellens,et al.  Qualitative Research in Information Systems , 2007, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[85]  Alina M. Chircu,et al.  E-government: key success factors for value discovery and realisation , 2005, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[86]  W. Scott The Adolescence of Institutional Theory. , 1987 .

[87]  L. Nelson,et al.  A case study in organisational change: implications for theory , 2003 .

[88]  Ashatu Hussein,et al.  The use of Triangulation in Social Sciences Research : Can qualitative and quantitative methods be combined? , 2009 .

[89]  Luiz Antonio Joia,et al.  Sources of resistance to G2G endeavors: Evidence from a case study in the Brazilian context , 2007 .

[90]  M. Hoepfl Choosing Qualitative Research: A Primer for Technology Education Researchers , 1997 .

[91]  Steve Rogers Public library services , 1979 .

[92]  Ludwig Christian Schaupp,et al.  Antecedents to E-File Adoption: The U.S. Perspective , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[93]  Andrea J. Cullen,et al.  e‐Government in Jordan: challenges and opportunities , 2008 .

[94]  A. Kakabadse,et al.  Reinventing the Democratic Governance Project through Information Technology? A Growing Agenda for Debate , 2003 .

[95]  E. Goffman Encounters; Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction , 1962 .

[96]  Mike Chiasson,et al.  Pushing the contextual envelope: developing and diffusing IS theory for health information systems research , 2004, Inf. Organ..

[97]  Ann Dykman,et al.  One-Stop Shopping. , 1995 .

[98]  Anastasia Papazafeiropoulou,et al.  Lessons learnt from the broadband diffusion in South Korea and the UK: implications for future government intervention in technology diffusion , 2006, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[99]  Eric W. Welch,et al.  Internet use, transparency, and interactivity effects on trust in government , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[100]  John A. Taylor,et al.  Reinventing government in the information age , 1994 .

[101]  K. Lewin Field theory in social science , 1951 .

[102]  Costas Lambrinoudakis,et al.  Security requirements for e-government services: a methodological approach for developing a common PKI-based security policy , 2003, Comput. Commun..

[103]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Socio-economic determinants of broadband adoption , 2007, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[104]  Jane Fedorowicz,et al.  Strategic alignment of participant motivations in e-government collaborations: The Internet Payment Platform pilot , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[105]  O. Williamson,et al.  Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. , 1977 .

[106]  Vishanth Weerakkody,et al.  E-government adoption: A cultural comparison , 2008, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[107]  Eric Deakins,et al.  E‐government in New Zealand: the local authority perspective , 2002 .

[108]  Z. Fang E-Government in Digital Era: Concept, Practice, and Development , 2002 .

[109]  Nikolaus Augsten,et al.  The Role of Web Services in Digital Government , 2003, EGOV.

[110]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[111]  Douglass C. North,et al.  Institutional Change and Economic Growth , 1971, The Journal of Economic History.

[112]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Different approaches to information age reform , 2002 .

[113]  Maeve McDonagh E-Government in Australia: the Challenge to Privacy of Personal Information , 2002, Int. J. Law Inf. Technol..

[114]  D. West E‐Government and the Transformation of Service Delivery and Citizen Attitudes , 2004 .

[115]  Vishanth Weerakkody,et al.  The Use of Wireless Internet Parks to Facilitate Adoption and Diffusion of E-Government Services: An Empirical Study in Qatar , 2008, AMCIS.

[116]  P. Hebda The Next Chapter , 2007 .

[117]  C. R. Hinings,et al.  Organizational Diversity and Change in Institutional Theory , 1998 .

[118]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Electronic transformation of government in the U.K.: a research agenda , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[119]  I. Ajzen Attitudes, Personality and Behavior , 1988 .

[120]  a. evangelidis FRAMES – A Risk Assessment Framework for e-Services , 2004 .

[121]  M. Zairi,et al.  Critical Success Factors of E-Government: A Proposed Model for E-Government Implementation , 2006, 2006 Innovations in Information Technology.

[122]  Victor Bekkers,et al.  Wiring Public Organizations and Changing Organizational Jurisdictions , 1998 .

[123]  Helle Zinner Henriksen,et al.  E-government maturity models: Extension of the Layne and Lee model , 2006, Gov. Inf. Q..

[124]  John Carlo Bertot,et al.  E-Government: initiatives, developments, and issues , 2002, Gov. Inf. Q..

[125]  John F. Affisco,et al.  E-government: a strategic operations management framework for service delivery , 2006, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[126]  Jyoti Choudrie,et al.  Broadband development in South Korea: institutional and cultural factors , 2004, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[127]  Thomas L. Wheelen,et al.  Strategic Management and Business Policy , 1983 .

[128]  Richard Heeks Reinventing Government in the Information Age: International Practice in IT-Enabled Public Sector Reform , 2002 .

[129]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  The endless wire: e-government as global phenomenon , 2003, Gov. Inf. Q..

[130]  Amir Hossein Ghapanchi,et al.  Toward national e-government development models for developing countries: A nine-stage model , 2008 .

[131]  Ann Macintosh,et al.  E-participation and Governance: Widening the net , 2005 .

[132]  A. Twycross Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches Creswell John W Sage 320 £29 0761924426 0761924426 [Formula: see text]. , 2004, Nurse researcher.

[133]  Gilles Paquet,et al.  E-Governance & government on-line in Canada: Partnerships, people & prospects , 2001, Gov. Inf. Q..

[134]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Gender Differences in the Perception and Use of E-Mail: An Extension to the Technology Acceptance Model , 1997, MIS Q..

[135]  R. Burgess Key Variables in Social Investigation , 1986 .

[136]  M. D. Myers,et al.  An introduction to qualitative research in information systems , 2002 .

[137]  Majed Al-Mashari,et al.  Innovation through Information Technology (IT) enabled Business Process Management (BPM): a review of key issues , 2006 .

[138]  France Bélanger,et al.  The utilization of e‐government services: citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors * , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[139]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Handbook of Research on ICT-Enabled Transformational Government: A Global Perspective [EDITED BOOK], , 2009 .

[140]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[141]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Understanding consumer adoption of broadband: an extension of the technology acceptance model , 2009, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[142]  Vishanth Weerakkody,et al.  Moving from E-Government to T-Government: A Study of Process Reengineering Challenges in a UK Local Authority Context , 2008, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[143]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Examining the influence of service quality and secondary influence on the behavioural intention to change internet service provider , 2010, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[144]  Richard Heeks Most eGovernment-for-Development Projects Fail: How Can Risks be Reduced? , 2003 .

[145]  Hussein Al-Omari,et al.  E-Government Architecture In Jordan: A Comparative Analysis , 2006 .

[146]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Information Technology Acceptance by Individual Professionals: A Model Comparison Approach , 2001, Decis. Sci..

[147]  John Krogstie,et al.  What is the value of eGovernment – and how can we actually realize it? , 2009 .

[148]  C. Cassell,et al.  Essential guide to qualitative methods in organizational research , 2004 .

[149]  Michael Parent,et al.  Mimetic Isomorphism and Technology Evaluation: Does Imitation Transcend Judgment? , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[150]  A. Onwuegbuzie,et al.  Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research , 2007 .

[151]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  The Emergence of Interpretivism in IS Research , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[152]  Lucy Atherton,et al.  seamlessUK – building bridges between information islands , 2002 .

[153]  Andrew Hall,et al.  Why Research Partnerships Really Matter: Innovation Theory, Institutional Arrangements and Implications for Developing New Technology for the Poor , 2001 .

[154]  Brian H. Kleiner,et al.  Which training methods are effective , 1996 .

[155]  S. Barley Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. , 1986, Administrative science quarterly.

[156]  Philip Calvert,et al.  Virtual Inequality: Beyond the Digital Divide , 2004 .

[157]  Andy P. Field,et al.  Discovering Statistics Using SPSS , 2000 .

[158]  W. Huang,et al.  E-Government Strategies in Developed and Developing Countries: An Implementation Framework and Case Study , 2006, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[159]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Transaction Stage of e-Government Systems: Identification of Its Location and Importance , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[160]  Sue Scott,et al.  Embodying Orgasm , 2002 .

[161]  Thompson S. H. Teo,et al.  What facilitates e-government development? A cross-country analysis , 2007, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[162]  L. Burns,et al.  Adoption and abandonment of matrix management programs: effects of organizational characteristics and interorganizational networks. , 1993, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[163]  François Heinderyckx Assessing e-Government Implementation Processes: A Pan-European Survey of Administrations Officials , 2002 .

[164]  Roine Johansson Nyinstitutionalismen inom organisationsanalysen : En skolbildnings uppkomst, spridning och utveckling , 2002 .

[165]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Technical and organisational challenges facing transactional e-government systems: an empirical study , 2005, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[166]  Omiros D. Sarikas,et al.  Realising integrated e‐government services: a UK local government perspective , 2007 .

[167]  Grant Norris,et al.  E-Business and ERP: Transforming the Enterprise , 2008 .

[168]  Stuart Bretschneider,et al.  Information Technology, E-Government, and Institutional Change , 2003 .

[169]  Rina Ghose,et al.  The complexities of citizen participation through collaborative governance , 2005 .

[170]  Jijie Wang,et al.  Information technology (IT) in Saudi Arabia: Culture and the acceptance and use of IT , 2007, Inf. Manag..

[171]  Richard Heeks e-Government as a Carrier of Context , 2005, Journal of Public Policy.

[172]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[173]  Donald R. Cooper,et al.  Business Research Methods , 1980 .

[174]  V. Weerakkody,et al.  Citizen's Acceptance of Electronic Services: A Qatari Perspective , 2009 .

[175]  M. Brown,et al.  Understanding E-Government Benefits , 2007 .

[176]  Paul Beynon-Davies,et al.  Evaluating electronic local government in the UK , 2003, J. Inf. Technol..

[177]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[178]  James Melitski,et al.  Capacity and E-Government Performance: An Analysis Based on Early Adopters of Internet Technologies in New Jersey , 2003 .

[179]  Lutz Hildebrandt,et al.  PLS Path Modeling – A Software Review , 2006 .

[180]  Antonio Cordella,et al.  E-government: towards the e-bureaucratic form? , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[181]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Understanding e-Government project trajectories from an actor-network perspective , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[182]  Qing Hu,et al.  Assimilation of Enterprise Systems: The Effect of Institutional Pressures and the Mediating Role of Top Management , 2007, MIS Q..

[183]  F. Land,et al.  The Contribution of Sociotechnical Systems Thinking to the Effective Adoption of e-Government and the Enhancement of Democracy , 2005 .

[184]  Leiser Silva,et al.  Institutional intervention and the expansion of ICTs in Latin America: The case of Chile , 2002, Inf. Technol. People.

[185]  Olivia R. Liu Sheng,et al.  Examining the Technology Acceptance Model Using Physician Acceptance of Telemedicine Technology , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[186]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Managing consumer adoption of broadband: examining drivers and barriers , 2009, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[187]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  DIGITAL INCLUSION PROJECTS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES: PROCESSES OF INSTITUTIONALISATION , 2007 .

[188]  Marinos Themistocleous,et al.  Thoughts on e-government , 2005, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[189]  Wm. Arthur Conklin,et al.  e-Government and Cyber Security: The Role of Cyber Security Exercises , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[190]  Ephrem Eyob,et al.  E-government: breaking the frontiers of inefficiencies in the public sector , 2004, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[191]  William F. West Administrative Rulemaking: An Old and Emerging Literature , 2005 .

[192]  T. Jick Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. , 1979 .

[193]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[194]  Lars Frank,et al.  Architecture for integration of distributed ERP systems and e-commerce systems , 2004, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[195]  Chris W. Clegg,et al.  Explaining intranet use with the technology acceptance model , 2001, J. Inf. Technol..

[196]  Liz Lee-Kelley,et al.  E-Government and Social Exclusion: An Empirical Study , 2003, J. Electron. Commer. Organ..

[197]  D. North Institutions, institutional change and economic performance: Cambridge university press. , 1990 .

[198]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Factors affecting consumers' behavioural intention to adopt broadband in Pakistan , 2007 .

[199]  Shannon W. Anderson,et al.  The impact of contextual and process factors on the evaluation of activity-based costing systems , 1999 .

[200]  Shu-hsien Liao,et al.  E-government implementation: Business contract legal support for Taiwanese businessmen in Mainland China , 2005, Gov. Inf. Q..

[201]  Burgelman J.-c.,et al.  A Prospective View of eGovernment in the European Union , 2005 .

[202]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Validation Guidelines for IS Positivist Research , 2004, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[203]  Wing Lam,et al.  Barriers to e-government integration , 2005, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[204]  Suha AlAwadhi,et al.  The Use of the UTAUT Model in the Adoption of E-Government Services in Kuwait , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[205]  G. R. Chavan,et al.  E-governance and its implementation , 2009 .

[206]  Mark Bevir,et al.  Traditions of Governance: Interpreting the Changing Role of the Public Sector in Comparative and Historical Perspective - eScholarship , 2003 .

[207]  N. Fligstein,et al.  The spread of the multidivisional form among large firms, 1919–1979 , 1985 .

[208]  Stuart M. Speedie,et al.  Factors influencing health information technology adoption in Thailand's community health centers: Applying the UTAUT model , 2009, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[209]  James A. Reimer,et al.  Enterprise Content Management , 2002, Datenbank-Spektrum.

[210]  Jungwoo Lee,et al.  Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model , 2001, Gov. Inf. Q..

[211]  Lynn Davis,et al.  Best practices in electronic government: Comprehensive electronic information dissemination for science and technology , 2001, Gov. Inf. Q..

[212]  Jin-Wan Seo,et al.  E-government in South Korea: planning and implementation , 2005, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[213]  Vishanth Weerakkody,et al.  E-government: a comparison of strategies in local authorities in the UK and Norway , 2007, Int. J. Electron. Bus..

[214]  Yuan Long,et al.  Synthesizing e-government stage models - a meta-synthesis based on meta-ethnography approach , 2005, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[215]  M. P. Gupta,et al.  E-government evaluation: a framework and case study , 2003, Gov. Inf. Q..

[216]  M.J. Northrop,et al.  William S. Pfeiffer, Technical Writing: A Practical Approach (3rd Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-hall, 1997 [Book Review] , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[217]  Anthony M. Cresswell,et al.  An enterprise application integration methodology for e-government , 2005, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[218]  Mete Yildiz,et al.  E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[219]  T. Newcomb,et al.  Readings in Social Psychology , 1948, Teachers College Record.

[220]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[221]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area , 2008, Gov. Inf. Q..

[222]  Babita Gupta,et al.  Espoused Organizational Culture Traits and Internet Technology Adoption , 2009, AMCIS.

[223]  Lisa L. Martin,et al.  The Promise of Institutionalist Theory , 1995 .

[224]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Social Cognitive Theory and Individual Reactions to Computing Technology: A Longitudinal Study , 1999, MIS Q..

[225]  R. Bogdan Qualitative research for education : an introduction to theory and methods / by Robert C. Bogdan and Sari Knopp Biklen , 1997 .

[226]  Oreste Signore,et al.  E-Government: Challenges and Opportunities , 2005 .

[227]  Sofiane Sahraoui,et al.  E‐inclusion as a further stage of e‐government? , 2007 .

[228]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance , 1999, MIS Q..

[229]  J. Creswell,et al.  Editorial: The New Era of Mixed Methods , 2007 .

[230]  V. Weerakkody,et al.  Exploring E-Government in the UK: Challenges, Issues and Complexities , 2005 .

[231]  Frank Land,et al.  Choosing Appropriate Information Systems Research Methodologies , 2002 .

[232]  Jeffrey W. Seifert,et al.  A Primer on E-Government: Sectors, Stages, Opportunities, and Challenges of Online Governance , 2003 .

[233]  Wei Li,et al.  Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[234]  Floyd J. Fowler,et al.  Survey Research Methods , 1984 .

[235]  Pamela S. Tolbert Institutional Environments and Resource Dependence: Sources of Administrative Structure in Institutions of Higher Education. , 1985 .

[236]  A. Bryman Social Research Methods -3/E. , 2010 .

[237]  Tony Cornford,et al.  A Policy Making View of E-Government Innovations in Public Governance , 2003, AMCIS.

[238]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[239]  Margaret Tan,et al.  Factors Influencing the Adoption of Internet Banking , 2000, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[240]  H C Triandis,et al.  Values, attitudes, and interpersonal behavior. , 1980, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[241]  D. Gilbert,et al.  Barriers and benefits in the adoption of e‐government , 2004 .

[242]  Vishanth Weerakkody,et al.  ADOPTION OF WIRELESS INTERNET PARKS: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY IN QATAR , 2008 .

[243]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  E-government success factors: Mapping practical tools to theoretical foundations , 2005, Gov. Inf. Q..

[244]  France Bélanger,et al.  Citizen adoption of electronic government initiatives , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[245]  Robert K. Yin,et al.  Applications of case study research , 1993 .

[246]  Michael Parent,et al.  Building Citizen Trust Through E-government , 2005, Gov. Inf. Q..

[247]  Victor Bekkers,et al.  E-government and the emergence of virtual organizations in the public sector , 2003, Inf. Polity.

[248]  Roland Traunmüller,et al.  Electronic Government: Where Are We Heading? , 2002, EGOV.

[249]  Rachel Silcock What is E-government , 2001 .

[250]  Rana Tassabehji,et al.  GENERATING CITIZEN TRUST IN E-GOVERNMENT USING A TRUST VERIFICATION AGENT: A RESEARCH NOTE , 2006 .

[251]  Zahir Irani,et al.  E-government adoption: architecture and barriers , 2005, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[252]  Victor Bekkers,et al.  The back-office of e-government (managing information domains as political economies) , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[253]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Information systems evaluation: navigating through the problem domain , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[254]  P. Norris Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide , 2001 .

[255]  Pamela R. Haunschild,et al.  Modes of Interorganizational Imitation: The Effects of Outcome Salience and Uncertainty , 1997 .

[256]  Kelly D. Edmiston State And Local E-Government , 2003 .

[257]  Chi-Kuang Chen,et al.  A comprehensive study of the digital divide phenomenon in Taiwanese government agencies , 2006, Int. J. Internet Enterp. Manag..

[258]  Chang Liu,et al.  Technology acceptance model for wireless Internet , 2003, Internet Res..

[259]  JoAnne Yates,et al.  Shaping Electronic Communication: The Metastructuring of Technology in the Context of Use , 1995 .

[260]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Learning lessons from evaluating eGovernment: Reflective case experiences that support transformational government , 2008, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[261]  Andrew J. Hoffman,et al.  From Heresy to Dogma: An Institutional History of Corporate Environmentalism , 1999 .

[262]  Georg Wittmann,et al.  Selection of Appropriate Payment Methods for E-Government - Model and Application , 2007, EGOV.

[263]  Robert M. Davison,et al.  From government to e-government: a transition model , 2005, Inf. Technol. People.

[264]  Tibert Verhagen,et al.  Perceived risk and trust associated with purchasing at electronic marketplaces , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[265]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[266]  Ralf Klischewski,et al.  E-Government Integration and Interoperability: Framing the Research Agenda , 2007 .

[267]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[268]  L. Zucker Institutional Theories of Organization , 1987 .

[269]  Christopher G. Reddick,et al.  Empirical Models of E-Government Growth in Local Governments , 2005 .

[270]  D. Silverman,et al.  The Theory of Organisations: A Sociological Framework , 1970 .

[271]  T. Kostova,et al.  Institutional Theory in the Study of Multinational Corporations: A Critique and New Directions , 2008 .

[272]  Brian D. Janz,et al.  Information Systems and Healthcare XVI: Physician Adoption of Electronic Medical Records: Applying the UTAUT Model in a Healthcare Context , 2007, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[273]  Martin Hughes,et al.  The Role of Process Evolution in Achieving Citizen Centered E-Government , 2003, AMCIS.

[274]  D. Denison,et al.  Paradox and Performance: Toward a Theory of Behavioral Complexity in Managerial Leadership , 1995 .

[275]  C. Pringle,et al.  introduction to a symposium , 1993 .

[276]  Fredrik Björck,et al.  Institutional Theory: A New Perspective for Research into IS/IT Security in Organisations , 2004, HICSS.

[277]  T. H. Kwon,et al.  Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation , 1987 .

[278]  Ranjit Bose,et al.  E-government: infrastructure and technologies for education and training , 2004, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[279]  Zahir Irani,et al.  A case study strategy as part of an information systems research methodology: a critique , 1999 .

[280]  Icek Ajzen,et al.  From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior , 1985 .

[281]  J. Fountain Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change , 2001 .

[282]  I. Ajzen The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[283]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[284]  V. Weerakkody,et al.  EXPLORING E-GOVERNMENT IN THE STATE OF QATAR: BENEFITS, CHALLENGES AND COMPLEXITIES , 2007 .

[285]  유창조 Naturalistic Inquiry , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[286]  R. Garnaut Reflections on the new institutional economics , 2002 .

[287]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology: Theoretical Directions and Methodological Implications , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[288]  Steve Strand,et al.  Discovering statistics using SPSS, 2nd edition , 2006 .

[289]  B. Weingast,et al.  The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power , 1987, American Political Science Review.

[290]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Establishing a framework for eGovernment research: project VIEGO , 2007 .

[291]  Laurence Brooks,et al.  E-government implementation in Zambia: contributing factors , 2007, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[292]  T. Skocpol Bringing the State Back In: Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research , 1985 .

[293]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Industrial Management & Data Systems Development of a survey instrument to examine consumer adoption of broadband , 2016 .

[294]  Douglass C. North,et al.  The Rise of the Western World: A New Economic History , 1973 .

[295]  Alain Pinsonneault,et al.  Survey Research Methodology in Management Information Systems: An Assessment , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[296]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Understanding and Predicting Electronic Commerce Adoption: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior , 2006, MIS Q..

[297]  Mete Yildiz,et al.  Examining the Motivations for E-Government from an Institutional Theory Perspective: Evidence from Turkey , 2003, DG.O.

[298]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  The Role of Innovation Characteristics and Perceived Voluntariness in the Acceptance of Information Technologies , 1997 .

[299]  Mohamed Zairi,et al.  Leadership in TQM Implementation , 1994 .

[300]  Richard Heeks Reinventing Government in the Information Age , 1999 .

[301]  John E. Dobson,et al.  Responsibility Modelling as a Technique for Requirements Definition , 1994 .

[302]  N. Denzin,et al.  The discipline and practice of qualitative research [Introduction]. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed. , 2000 .

[303]  Paul T. Jaeger,et al.  User-centered e-government: Challenges and benefits for government Web sites , 2006, Gov. Inf. Q..

[304]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[305]  Chang Liu,et al.  An Application of the UTAUT Model for Understanding Student Perceptions Using Course Management Software , 2007, Communications of the IIMA.

[306]  Muhammad Mustafa Kamal,et al.  Investigating enterprise application integration (EAI) adoption in the local government authorities (LGAs) , 2008 .

[307]  Catherine C. Marshall,et al.  Designing Qualitative Research , 1996 .

[308]  Heather A. Haveman Follow the leader: Mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets , 1993 .

[309]  A. Schutz Symbol Reality and Society , 1962 .

[310]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Individual Trust in Online Firms: Scale Development and Initial Test , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[311]  Shafi Al-Shafi,et al.  Free Wireless Internet Park Services: An Investigation of Technology Adoption in Qatar from a Citizens' Perspective , 2008, J. Cases Inf. Technol..

[312]  G. Hodgson THE EVOLUTION OF EVOLUTIONARY ECONOMICS , 1995 .

[313]  Vishanth Weerakkody,et al.  Implementing and managing e-government in the State of Qatar: a citizens' perspective , 2007, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[314]  Reggie Davidrajuh,et al.  Realizing a new e-commerce tool for formation of a virtual enterprise , 2003, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[315]  Philip E. T. Lewis,et al.  Research Methods for Business Students (2nd edition) , 2000 .

[316]  T. Das QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOUR , 1983 .

[317]  Marinos Themistocleous,et al.  The impact of enterprise application integration on information system lifecycles , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[318]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace1 , 1992 .

[319]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[320]  Alicia Kritsonis,et al.  Comparison of Change Theories , 2005 .

[321]  L. Zucker The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. , 1977 .

[322]  J. Prins Electronic Government, Variations on a concept , 2001 .

[323]  C. Romano,et al.  Research Strategies for Small Business: A Case Study Approach , 1989 .

[324]  V. Venkatesh,et al.  AGE DIFFERENCES IN TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION DECISIONS: IMPLICATIONS FOR A CHANGING WORK FORCE , 2000 .

[325]  A. Ho Reinventing Local Governments and the E‐Government Initiative , 2002 .

[326]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Information Systems and Developing Countries: Failure, Success, and Local Improvisations , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[327]  Kimberly Stoltzfus,et al.  Motivations for implementing e-government: an investigation of the global phenomenon , 2005, DG.O.

[328]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[329]  David Hardisty,et al.  On the Internet , 2000, Biological Psychiatry.

[330]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[331]  W. Chismar,et al.  The interaction of institutionally triggered and technology-triggered social structure change: an investigation of computerized physician order entry , 2007 .

[332]  E. C. Murphy Leadership IQ: A Personal Development Process Based on a Scientific Study of a New Generation of Leaders , 1996 .

[333]  J. Nunnally Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[334]  P. Berger,et al.  Social Construction of Reality , 1991, The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Mass Media and Society.

[335]  Ajay Kumar E‐Government and Efficiency, Accountability and Transparency , 2003 .

[336]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Predicting Intention to Adopt Interorganizational Linkages: An Institutional Perspective , 2003, MIS Q..

[337]  Perry R. Hinton SPSS Explained , 2004 .

[338]  T. Skocpol Protecting Soldiers And Mothers , 1992 .

[339]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  The Strategic Co-Alignment for Implementing Information Systems in E-Government , 2009, PACIS.

[340]  Sarmad Alshawi,et al.  A leadership model for e-government transformation , 2007 .

[341]  D. McNabb Knowledge management in the public sector: a blueprint for innovation in government , 2007 .

[342]  Renée A. Irvin,et al.  Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is It Worth the effort? , 2004 .

[343]  J M Morse,et al.  Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. , 1991, Nursing research.

[344]  Lars Norén,et al.  Nyinstitutionalismen inom organisationsanalysen: Roine Johansson; Studentlitteratur, Lund, 2002 , 2004 .

[345]  Shaila M. Miranda,et al.  Professional Versus Political Contexts: Institutional Mitigation and the Transaction Cost Heuristic in Information Systems Outsourcing , 2006, MIS Q..

[346]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Understanding the adopters and non-adopters of broadband , 2009, CACM.

[347]  A. Adam Whatever happened to information systems ethics? Caught between the devil and the deep blue sea , 2004 .

[348]  D. Pugh,et al.  How to Get a PhD: A Handbook for Students and Their Supervisors , 1994 .

[349]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Influence of Experience on Personal Computer Utilization: Testing a Conceptual Model , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[350]  Annie S. McGowan,et al.  Satisfaction with activity-based cost management implementation , 1997 .

[351]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  A Longitudinal Investigation of Personal Computers in Homes: Adoption Determinants and Emerging Challenges , 2001, MIS Q..

[352]  Rodger Jamieson,et al.  Determining Key Factors in E-Government Information System Security , 2006, Bled eConference.

[353]  Marinos Themistocleous,et al.  Justifying the Decisions for EAI Adoption in LGAs: A Validated Proposition of Factors, Adoption Lifecycle Phases, Mapping and Prioritisation of Factors , 2009 .

[354]  Khalifah Alhamidah,et al.  The adoption of e-Government and its outcomes , 2007 .

[355]  Subhajit Basu,et al.  E‐government and developing countries: an overview , 2004 .

[356]  Kathleen M. T. Collins,et al.  A Model Incorporating the Rationale and Purpose for Conducting Mixed-Methods Research in Special Education and Beyond , 2006 .

[357]  G. Walsham,et al.  Digital inclusion projects in developing countries: Processes of institutionalization , 2009 .

[358]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Encouraging Citizen Adoption of eGovernment by Building Trust , 2002, Electron. Mark..

[359]  I-Chiu Chang,et al.  Physicians' acceptance of pharmacokinetics-based clinical decision support systems , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[360]  Alok Mishra,et al.  E-Government: A global view and an empirical evaluation of some attributes of citizens , 2005, Gov. Inf. Q..

[361]  David C. Yen,et al.  E-government: An analysis for implementation: Framework for understanding cultural and social impact , 2005, Gov. Inf. Q..

[362]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[363]  Christopher D. Ittner,et al.  Implementing Performance Measurement Innovations: Evidence from Government , 2004 .

[364]  Peter Kawalek,et al.  Pursuing Radical Transformation in Information Age Government: Case Studies Using the SPRINT Methodology , 2005, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[365]  S. Mezias An Institutional Model of Organizational Practice: Financial Reporting at the Fortune 200 , 1990 .

[366]  Graham Pervan,et al.  ICT and OTs: A model of information and communication technology acceptance and utilisation by occupational therapists , 2007, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[367]  K. Punch Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches , 2008 .

[368]  Suzanne Beaumaster,et al.  Local government IT implementation issues: a challenge for public administration , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[369]  W. Powell,et al.  The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis , 1992 .

[370]  John Mingers,et al.  The paucity of multimethod research: a review of the information systems literature , 2003, Inf. Syst. J..

[371]  L. R. Wise,et al.  Disability Access and E-Government , 2008 .

[372]  Holger von der Lippe,et al.  Social Influences on Fertility , 2007 .

[373]  Qing Hu,et al.  The Role of External Influences on Organizational Information Security Practices: An Institutional Perspective , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[374]  Dimitrios Tzovaras,et al.  The need for a digital rights management framework for the next generation of e-government services , 2004, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[375]  Lai Lai Tung,et al.  Adoption of electronic government services among business organizations in Singapore , 2005, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[376]  Eun-Kyung Na,et al.  Factors Affecting User Participation in Video UCC (User-Created Contents) Services , 2007 .

[377]  Sweta Sneha,et al.  Socio-Cognitive Assessment of Physicians' Engagement with Electronic Medical Records (EMR): A Pre-EMR Implementation Study in Developing Countries , 2009, AMCIS.

[378]  Babajide Osatuyi,et al.  Examining Online Banking Initiatives in Nigeria: A Value Network Approach , 2009, Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Ctries..

[379]  Jyoti Choudrie,et al.  Horizontal Process Integration in E-Government: The Perspective of a UK Local Authority , 2007, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[380]  Donald F. Norris,et al.  Is Your Local Government Plugged In? Highlights of the 2000 Electronic Government Survey , 2001 .

[381]  Patrick Dunleavy,et al.  Cultural Barriers to e-government , 2002 .

[382]  Blaize Horner Reich,et al.  IT alignment: what have we learned? , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[383]  Measuring Fairness in Citizen Participation: A Case Study of Moose Management , 1999 .

[384]  O. Williamson The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach , 1981, American Journal of Sociology.

[385]  R. Bogdan,et al.  Qualitative Research in Education. An Introduction to Theory and Methods. Third Edition. , 1998 .

[386]  Manfred Max Bergman,et al.  7 Quality of Inferences in Mixed Methods Research: Calling for an Integrative Framework , 2008 .

[387]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  The advantages of web service orchestration in perspective , 2004, ICEC '04.

[388]  Peter Trkman,et al.  A conceptual model for the development of broadband and e-government , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[389]  C. May,et al.  Interaction between States and Citizens in the Age of the Internet: “e-Government” in the United States, Britain, and the European Union , 2003 .

[390]  Marinos Themistocleous,et al.  Evaluating e‐government: learning from the experiences of two UK local authorities , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[391]  Alex Z. Kondra,et al.  Institutional processes of organizational culture , 2009 .

[392]  Richard Heeks Understanding e-Governance for Development , 2001 .

[393]  Frank Dobbin,et al.  In Search of Identity and Legitimation , 2006 .

[394]  Kwok Kee Wei,et al.  Successful e-government in Singapore , 2004, CACM.

[395]  Sanda Erdelez,et al.  Information micro-practices in Texas rural courts: methods and issues for e-government , 2002, Gov. Inf. Q..

[396]  Ryad Titah,et al.  E-Government Adoption and Acceptance: A Literature Review , 2006, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[397]  Seongcheol Kim,et al.  An institutional analysis of an e-government system for anti-corruption: The case of OPEN , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[398]  Richard E. Boyatzis,et al.  Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development , 1998 .

[399]  Neil F. Doherty,et al.  From technical to socio-technical change: tackling the human and organizational aspects of systems development projects , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[400]  Diana Burley Gant,et al.  Web portal functionality and state government e-service , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[401]  Atul Gupta,et al.  Adoption of ICT in a government organization in a developing country: An empirical study , 2008, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[402]  K. Perreault,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2011 .

[403]  June Lu,et al.  Personal innovativeness, social influences and adoption of wireless Internet services via mobile technology , 2005, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[404]  C. Prins Designing e-government , 2007 .

[405]  Hossein Sharifi,et al.  An Adaptive Approach for Implementing e-Government in I. R. Iran , 2004 .

[406]  N. Denzin,et al.  Introduction: The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research. , 2005 .

[407]  Doria Pilling,et al.  Moving toward e-government: effective strategies for increasing access and use of the internet among non-internet users in the U.S. and U.K , 2007, DG.O.

[408]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  Positioning the institutional perspective in information systems research , 2009, J. Inf. Technol..

[409]  Tony Cornford,et al.  ICT, Innovation and Public Management: Governance, Models & Alternatives for E-Government Infrastructures , 2005, ECIS.

[410]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Institutional Factors in Information Technology Innovation , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[411]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Identifying critical factors for adoption of e-government , 2009, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[412]  Hans Jochen Scholl E-Government-Induced Business Process Change (BPC): An Empirical Study of Current Practices , 2005, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[413]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization , 1991, MIS Q..

[414]  M. J. Moon,et al.  Advancing E‐Government at the Grassroots: Tortoise or Hare? , 2005 .

[415]  Venkatesh,et al.  A Longitudinal Field Investigation of Gender Differences in Individual Technology Adoption Decision-Making Processes. , 2000, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[416]  Dong-Hee Shin,et al.  A critique of Korean National Information Strategy: Case of national information infrastructures , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[417]  Pamela S. Tolbert,et al.  Institutional Sources of Change in the Formal Structure of Organizations: The Diffusion of Civil Service Reform, 1880-1935 , 1983 .

[418]  Elisa D 'Angelo Weichel,et al.  Legislative Analyst's Office , 1999 .

[419]  Keng L. Siau,et al.  Group Creativity and Technology , 1995 .

[420]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[421]  Georg Aichholzer,et al.  Organizational challenges to the development of electronic government , 2000, Proceedings 11th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications.