How to avoid unrealistic appraisal results? A concept to reflect the occurrence of risk in the appraisal of transport infrastructure projects

Planning, constructing, financing and operating transport infrastructure involves a wide range of different risks. This poses a challenge for the appraisal of transport infrastructure projects. The current paper addresses this challenge by elaborating on a concept that considers the issue of risk by transport infrastructure evaluation concepts, on the basis of already applied methodologies. The paper begins by substantiating the pattern of ‘risk’ in transport infrastructure planning. Subsequently, five basic methodologies that incorporate the issue of risk in transport project appraisal are briefly presented: sensitivity analysis, scenario analysis, Monte Carlo Simulation, Quantified Optimism Bias and qualitative approaches. For each methodology, real-world applications of infrastructure appraisal in individual countries, regions or supranational organizations are presented. After providing a synoptic overview of these methodologies, a concept is presented that reflects the occurrence of risk in the assessment of transport infrastructure projects.

[1]  R. Bain Error and optimism bias in toll road traffic forecasts , 2009 .

[2]  Patrick T.I. Lam,et al.  A sectoral review of risks associated with major infrastructure projects , 1999 .

[3]  David Banister,et al.  Assessment of large transport infrastructure projects: The CBA-DK model , 2009 .

[4]  Bent Flyvbjerg,et al.  Cost Overruns in Large-Scale Transportation Infrastructure Projects: Explanations and Their Theoretical Embeddedness , 2010, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research.

[5]  Søren L. Buhl,et al.  Inaccuracy in Traffic Forecasts , 2006 .

[6]  B. Flyvbjerg,et al.  Megaprojects and Risk: An Anatomy of Ambition , 2003 .

[7]  G Wilson,et al.  GUIDE TO BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS IN TRANSPORT CANADA , 1994 .

[8]  Eric Molin,et al.  Characteristics of Cost Overruns for Dutch Transport Infrastructure Projects and the Importance of the Decision to Build and Project Phases , 2012 .

[9]  Steen Leleur,et al.  Assessment of Transport Projects: Risk Analysis and Decision Support , 2008 .

[10]  Bent Flyvbjerg,et al.  Procedures for Dealing with Optimism Bias in Transport Planning , 2004 .

[11]  Gary T. Fry,et al.  Defining Triangular Probability Distributions from Historical Cost Data , 2000 .

[12]  Herman Kahn On Thermonuclear War , 1960 .

[13]  Keith R. Molenaar,et al.  Risk Assessment and Allocation for Highway Construction Management , 2006 .

[14]  R. Naumann Kosten-Risiko-Analyse fuer Verkehrsinfrastrukturprojekte , 2007 .

[15]  Robert L. K. Tiong,et al.  NPV-at-Risk Method in Infrastructure Project Investment Evaluation , 2000 .

[16]  Søren L. Buhl,et al.  Underestimating Costs in Public Works Projects: Error or Lie? , 2002, 1303.6604.

[17]  Jery R. Stedinger,et al.  Water Resources Systems Planning And Management , 2006 .

[18]  Bent Flyvbjerg Public Planning of Mega-Projects: Overestimation of Demand and Underestimation of Costs , 2008 .

[19]  Werner Rothengatter,et al.  Spending Scarce Funds More Efficiently - Including the Pattern of Interdependence in Cost-Benefit Analysis , 2012 .

[20]  Søren L. Buhl,et al.  How (In)accurate Are Demand Forecasts in Public Works Projects?: The Case of Transportation , 2005, 1303.6654.

[21]  J. Sanderson Risk, uncertainty and governance in megaprojects: A critical discussion of alternative explanations , 2012 .

[22]  農林水産奨励会農林水産政策情報センター,et al.  The green book : appraisal and evaluation in central government , 2003 .

[23]  Steen Leleur,et al.  Modelling of Transport Project Uncertainties: Feasibility Risk Assessment and Scenario Analysis , 2012 .