Physical characteristics of a full-field digital mammography system

Abstract The physical performance characteristics of a flat-panel clinical full-field digital mammography (FFDM) system were investigated for a variety of mammographic X-ray spectral conditions. The system was investigated using 26 kVp: Mo/Mo, 28 kVp: Mo/Rh, and 30 kVp: Rh/Rh, with polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) “tissue equivalent material” of thickness 20, 45, and 60 mm for each of three X-ray spectra, resulting in nine different spectral conditions. The experimental results were compared with a theoretical cascaded linear systems-based model that has been developed independently by other investigators. The FFDM imager (Senographe 2000D, GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, WI) uses an amorphous silicon (aSi:H) photodiode (100 μm pixel) array directly coupled to a cesium iodide (CsI) scintillator. The spatial resolution of the digital mammography system was determined by measuring the presampling modulation transfer function (MTF). The noise power spectra (NPS) of the system were measured under the different mammographic X-ray spectral conditions at an exposure of approximately 10 mR to the detector from which corresponding detective quantum efficiencies (DQE) were determined. The experimental results provide additional information on the performance of the mammographic system for a broader range of experimental conditions than have been reported in the past. The flat-panel imager exhibits favorable physical quality characteristics under the conditions investigated. The experimental results were compared with theoretical estimates under various spectral conditions and demonstrated good agreement.

[1]  J A Rowlands,et al.  Absorption and noise in cesium iodide x-ray image intensifiers. , 1983, Medical physics.

[2]  C. Beaulieu,et al.  Circular tomosynthesis: potential in imaging of breast and upper cervical spine--preliminary phantom and in vitro study. , 2003, Radiology.

[3]  D. Kopans,et al.  Tomographic mammography using a limited number of low-dose cone-beam projection images. , 2003, Medical physics.

[4]  Kerry T. Krugh,et al.  Microcalcification detectability for four mammographic detectors: flat-panel, CCD, CR, and screen/film). , 2002, Medical physics.

[5]  C E Ravin,et al.  Imaging characteristics of an amorphous silicon flat-panel detector for digital chest radiography. , 2001, Radiology.

[6]  S Muller,et al.  Full-field digital mammography designed as a complete system. , 1999, European journal of radiology.

[7]  Kunio Doi,et al.  A simple method for determining the modulation transfer function in digital radiography , 1992, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[8]  Kenneth A Fetterly,et al.  Performance evaluation of a "dual-side read" dedicated mammography computed radiography system. , 2003, Medical physics.

[9]  Serge Muller,et al.  Development of contrast digital mammography. , 2002, Medical physics.

[10]  R. K. Swank.  Absorption and noise in x‐ray phosphors , 1973 .

[11]  Wei Zhao,et al.  Imaging performance of amorphous selenium based flat-panel detectors for digital mammography: characterization of a small area prototype detector. , 2003, Medical physics.

[12]  Qihua Zhao,et al.  System performance of a prototype flat-panel imager operated under mammographic conditions. , 2003, Medical physics.

[13]  S Suryanarayanan,et al.  Mammographic imaging with a small format CCD-based digital cassette: physical characteristics of a clinical system. , 2000, Medical physics.

[14]  D. Bollini,et al.  Attenuation compensation for breast tissue in combined CT/SPECT devices dedicated to mammography , 2003 .

[15]  M. Williams,et al.  Noise power spectra of images from digital mammography detectors. , 1999, Medical physics.

[16]  E Grabbe,et al.  Storage phosphor direct magnification mammography in comparison with conventional screen-film mammography--a phantom study. , 1998, The British journal of radiology.

[17]  W Huda,et al.  Scattered radiation in scanning slot mammography. , 1998, Medical physics.

[18]  M B Williams,et al.  Analysis of the detective quantum efficiency of a developmental detector for digital mammography. , 1999, Medical Physics (Lancaster).

[19]  Biao Chen,et al.  Cone-beam volume CT breast imaging: feasibility study. , 2002, Medical physics.

[20]  H. Blume,et al.  DQE(f) of four generations of computed radiography acquisition devices. , 1995, Medical physics.

[21]  Walter Dr. Hillen,et al.  Signal-to-noise performance in cesium iodide x-ray fluorescent screens , 1991, Medical Imaging.

[22]  A Fenster,et al.  Scanned-projection digital mammography. , 1987, Medical physics.

[23]  John M Lewin,et al.  Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography: feasibility. , 2003, Radiology.

[24]  Richard L. Van Metter,et al.  Conversion noise measurement for front and back x-ray intensifying screens , 1990, Medical Imaging.

[25]  Chris C Shaw,et al.  Dual-energy digital mammography: calibration and inverse-mapping techniques to estimate calcification thickness and glandular-tissue ratio. , 2003, Medical physics.

[26]  J Yorkston,et al.  Empirical and theoretical investigation of the noise performance of indirect detection, active matrix flat-panel imagers (AMFPIs) for diagnostic radiology. , 1997, Medical physics.

[27]  A Fenster,et al.  A spatial-frequency dependent quantum accounting diagram and detective quantum efficiency model of signal and noise propagation in cascaded imaging systems. , 1994, Medical physics.

[28]  H Liu,et al.  Charge-coupled device detector: performance considerations and potential for small-field mammographic imaging applications. , 1992, Medical physics.

[29]  C J D'Orsi,et al.  Evaluation of linear and nonlinear tomosynthetic reconstruction methods in digital mammography. , 2001, Academic radiology.

[30]  P. Granfors,et al.  Performance of a 41X41-cm2 amorphous silicon flat panel x-ray detector for radiographic imaging applications. , 2000, Medical physics.

[31]  John A. Rowlands,et al.  Effect of depth-dependent modulation transfer function and K-fluorescence reabsorption on the detective quantum efficiency of indirect-conversion flat-panel x-ray imaging systems using CsI , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[32]  J H Siewerdsen,et al.  Strategies to improve the signal and noise performance of active matrix, flat-panel imagers for diagnostic x-ray applications. , 2000, Medical physics.

[33]  M. Rabbani,et al.  Detective quantum efficiency of imaging systems with amplifying and scattering mechanisms. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[34]  A Workman,et al.  A comparison of the imaging properties of CCD-based devices used for small field digital mammography. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[35]  D. Kopans,et al.  Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. , 1997, Radiology.

[36]  R Birch,et al.  Computation of bremsstrahlung X-ray spectra and comparison with spectra measured with a Ge(Li) detector. , 1979, Physics in medicine and biology.

[37]  David P. Trauernicht,et al.  The Measurement Of Conversion Noise In X-Ray Intensifying Screens , 1988, Medical Imaging.

[38]  S Suryanarayanan,et al.  Full breast digital mammography with an amorphous silicon-based flat panel detector: physical characteristics of a clinical prototype. , 2000, Medical physics.

[39]  G T Barnes,et al.  Signal-to-noise ratio considerations in radiographic imaging. , 1983, Medical physics.

[40]  A Fenster,et al.  A time-delay integration charge-coupled device camera for slot-scanned digital radiography. , 1990, Medical physics.

[41]  B. Munier,et al.  Full field digital mammography scanner. , 1999, European journal of radiology.

[42]  Douglas Albagli,et al.  Modeling the x-ray energy characteristics of DQE for full-field digital mammography , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[43]  M Gambaccini,et al.  Dual-energy imaging in full-field digital mammography: a phantom study. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[44]  J Yorkston,et al.  Signal, noise power spectrum, and detective quantum efficiency of indirect-detection flat-panel imagers for diagnostic radiology. , 1998, Medical physics.

[45]  J. Boone,et al.  Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose and image quality evaluation. , 2001, Radiology.

[46]  Srinivasan Vedantham,et al.  Flat-panel digital mammography system: contrast-detail comparison between screen-film radiographs and hard-copy images. , 2002, Radiology.

[47]  C J D'Orsi,et al.  Comparison of tomosynthesis methods used with digital mammography. , 2000, Academic radiology.

[48]  M J Yaffe,et al.  Analysis of the spatial-frequency-dependent DQE of optically coupled digital mammography detectors. , 1994, Medical physics.

[49]  J M Lewin,et al.  Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945 paired examinations. , 2001, Radiology.

[50]  R. Speller,et al.  Image-quality performance of an a-Si : H-based X-ray imaging system for digital mammography , 2002 .

[51]  C E Dick,et al.  Image information transfer properties of x-ray intensifying screens in the energy range from 17 to 320 keV. , 1993, Medical physics.