Using a Socially Assistive Humanoid Robot to Encourage Infant Leg Motion Training

Early interventions have the potential to positively influence infant movement patterns and support optimal neurodevelopmental outcomes. This work developed and validated a non-contact socially assistive infant-robot interaction system that aimed to use contingent reward learning and imitation to deliver effective early interventions that complement humandelivered therapy. The described study explored if infants demonstrate contingent learning and imitation behavior in response to movements by a similarly-sized NAO humanoid robot. Twelve 6to 8-month-old infants participated in a within-subjects study that compared different robot contingent reward policies for encouraging leg movement. Nine of the twelve participants learned the contingency. Of these learners, two responded less to the movement and lights reward than other rewards. Nine of the twelve infants imitated the NAO robot during at least one reward condition phase. These imitators displayed different learning rates and sometimes changed their behavior to imitate less during later reward conditions. Infants were generally alert and non-fussy when interacting with the robot. Parents of participants perceived the robot reward involving both movement and sound to be most engaging for their children. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first foray into using socially assistive robots with infants. As this new research area develops, our results aim to inform continued work into targeted robot-assisted infant motion interventions.

[1]  C. Hofsten,et al.  Infants predict other people's action goals , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[2]  B. Scassellati,et al.  Robots for use in autism research. , 2012, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[3]  Maja J. Mataric,et al.  A Data Collection of Infants’ Visual, Physical, and Behavioral Reactions to a Small Humanoid Robot , 2018, 2018 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO).

[4]  Michele A Lobo,et al.  Assessment and stability of early learning abilities in preterm and full-term infants across the first two years of life. , 2013, Research in developmental disabilities.

[5]  D. Lewkowicz,et al.  A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. , 2007, Journal of cognitive neuroscience.

[6]  H. Hayne,et al.  Developmental changes in deferred imitation by 6- to 24-month-old infants , 1996 .

[7]  J. Darrah,et al.  Motor Assessment of the Developing Infant , 1994 .

[8]  Beth A Smith,et al.  Kinematic characteristics of infant leg movements produced across a full day , 2017, Journal of rehabilitation and assistive technologies engineering.

[9]  Gehan Roberts,et al.  Rates of early intervention services in very preterm children with developmental disabilities at age 2 years , 2008, Journal of paediatrics and child health.

[10]  B. Kay,et al.  Infant bouncing: the assembly and tuning of action systems. , 1993, Child development.

[11]  Hiroshi Ishiguro,et al.  Infant discrimination of humanoid robots , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[12]  C. Robinson,et al.  Part C Early Intervention for Infants and Toddlers: Percentage Eligible Versus Served , 2013, Pediatrics.

[13]  Wendy Moyle,et al.  The Effectiveness of Social Robots for Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies , 2018, The Gerontologist.

[14]  E. Thelen,et al.  From spontaneous to instrumental behavior: kinematic analysis of movement changes during very early learning. , 1983, Child development.

[15]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  Socially Assistive Robotics: Methods and Implications for the Future of Work and Care , 2022, Robophilosophy.

[16]  Nicolas Schweighofer,et al.  Infant Exploratory Learning: Influence on Leg Joint Coordination , 2014, PloS one.

[17]  Bilge Mutlu,et al.  Embodiment in Socially Interactive Robots , 2019, Found. Trends Robotics.

[18]  Mohamad A Mikati,et al.  Care for child development: basic science rationale and effects of interventions. , 2011, Pediatric neurology.

[19]  C. Rovee-Collier,et al.  The economics of infancy: a review of conjugate reinforcement. , 1979, Advances in child development and behavior.

[20]  Susan S. Jones PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Imitation in Infancy The Development of Mimicry , 2022 .