Imputed Rent and Income Inequality: A Decomposition Analysis for Great Britain, West Germany and the U.S

This article deals with income advantages derived from owner-occupied housing and their impact on the personal income distribution. Using micro-data from the British Household Panel Study (BHPS), the German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP), and the U.S. Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) we find distinct cross-national differences in terms of the prevalence and extent of imputed rent. Results from inequality decomposition analyses show this overall impact to be the net effect of two conflicting changes: On the one hand there is increasing income inequality between the groups of owneroccupiers and renters, respectively, and, on the other hand, we find inequality to be decreasing within the group of those owner-occupiers who own outright. When focussing on imputed rent as a means of old-age provision, our results for all three countries show an income advantage for, as well as a poverty reducing effect among the elderly. The empirical findings support the claim for the need of an improved harmonization of this non-cash income component especially for the purpose of cross-national comparative research.

[1]  T. Smeeding,et al.  Non-cash Income, Living Standards and Inequality: Evidence from the Luxembourg Income Study , 1993 .

[2]  Joachim R. Frick,et al.  Der Einfluß von Imputed Rent auf die personelle Einkommensverteilung , 2001 .

[3]  F. Bourguignon.  On the Measurement of Inequality , 2003 .

[4]  T. Smeeding,et al.  POVERTY, TNEQUALTTY, AND FAMTLY LIVING STANDARDS IMPACTS ACROSS SEVEN NATIONS: THE EFFECT OF NONCASH SUBSIDIES FOR HEALTH, EDUCATION AND HOUSING , 1993 .

[5]  M. White,et al.  Taxing and Subsidizing Housing Investment: The Rise and Fall of Housing&Apos;S Favored Status , 2000 .

[6]  E. Wolff.  WEALTH HOLDINGS AND POVERTY STATUS IN THE U.S. , 1990 .

[7]  G. Pryce,et al.  Household Leverage and the Deductibility of Home Mortgage Interest: Evidence from UK House Purchasers , 2002 .

[8]  Martha S. Hill,et al.  The Panel Study of Income Dynamics: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[9]  T. Smeeding,et al.  Toward a Uniform Definition of Household Income , 2001 .

[10]  P. Gottschalk,et al.  Cross-National Comparisons of Earnings and Income Inequality , 1997 .

[11]  William G. Grigsby,et al.  Income tax concessions for owner‐occupied housing , 2000 .

[12]  J. S. Butler,et al.  Changes in Permanent Income Inequality in the United States and Germany in the 1990s , 1999 .

[13]  Marshall B. Reinsdorf,et al.  Alternative Measures of Personal Saving , 2002 .

[14]  D. Radner.  Noncash Income, Equivalence Scales, and the Measurement of Economic Well-Being , 1997 .

[15]  J. Schwarze.  Simulating German Income and Social Security Tax Payments Using the GSOEP , 1995 .

[16]  A. Shorrocks,et al.  Inequality Decomposition by Population Subgroups , 1984 .

[17]  S. Jenkins,et al.  Retirement and the economic well-being of the elderly: a British perspective , 2000 .

[18]  R. Moffitt,et al.  A New Index to Value In-Kind Benefits , 1991 .

[19]  G. Wagner,et al.  How unification and immigration affected the German income distribution , 1999 .

[20]  J. Yates.  IMPUTED RENT AND INCOME DISTRIBUTION , 1994 .

[21]  Joachim R. Frick,et al.  Weitere Angleichungen der Wohnverhältnisse in West- und Ostdeutschland: Ergebnisse des Sozio-oekonomischen Panels , 2000 .

[22]  A. Shorrocks,et al.  The Class of Additively Decomposable Inequality Measures , 1980 .

[23]  Katherine A. Kiel,et al.  The Accuracy of Owner-Provided House Values: The 1978-1991 American Housing Survey , 1999 .

[24]  David C. Ling,et al.  The preferential income tax treatment of owner‐occupied housing: Who really benefits? , 1993 .

[25]  S. Jenkins.  Accounting for Inequality Trends: Decomposition Analyses for the UK, 1971-86 , 1995 .