Life cycle analysis of geothermal energy for power and transportation: A stochastic approach

Abstract Increasing awareness of environmental issues surrounding power generation and transportation has increased interest in renewable energy sources such as geothermal. Renewable energy extraction is not without environmental cost, however; drilling operations and construction of the facilities required for utilization can be resource intensive. Complete life cycle analysis (LCA) allows for impact comparison between competing methods of power generation. The results are modular, allowing for use in other product life cycles. One such life cycle is that of the transportation vehicle. An analysis of vehicle life cycles involving geothermal energy is performed employing the Greenhouse Gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy Use in Transportation (GREET) model. Geothermal power has large variations between plants owing to differences in the hydrothermal reservoir chemistry and thermodynamic conditions. Due to these variations, a stochastic approach was used to determine the amount of variation that is likely to be seen using this energy source. The results show geothermal power to have low environmental impact relative to other methods of energy production for use in transportation.

[1]  Robert M. Neilson,et al.  Production of greenhouse gases from geothermal power plants , 1999 .

[2]  Shang-Lien Lo,et al.  Quantifying and reducing uncertainty in life cycle assessment using the Bayesian Monte Carlo method. , 2005, The Science of the total environment.

[3]  J. Lowenstern,et al.  Gas and Isotope Geochemistry of 81 Steam Samples from Wells in The Geysers Geothermal Field, Sonoma and Lake Counties, California , 1999 .

[4]  Gregory A Norris.  Life cycle emission distributions within the economy: implications for life cycle impact assessment. , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[5]  S. Russo,et al.  Low-enthalpy geothermal energy: An opportunity to meet increasing energy needs and reduce CO2 and atmospheric pollutant emissions in Piemonte, Italy , 2009 .

[6]  Philipp Blum,et al.  Review on life cycle environmental effects of geothermal power generation , 2013 .

[7]  Laura Vanoli,et al.  Integrating life cycle assessment and emergy synthesis for the evaluation of a dry steam geothermal power plant in Italy , 2015 .

[8]  Martin Kaltschmitt,et al.  Life cycle assessment of geothermal binary power plants using enhanced low-temperature reservoirs , 2010 .

[9]  Ronald DiPippo,et al.  Geothermal energy Electricity generation and environmental impact , 1991 .

[10]  A. Kagel,et al.  A guide to geothermal energy and the environment , 2005 .

[11]  Wolfgang Wagner,et al.  Reference Equations of State for the Thermodynamic Properties of Fluid Phase n-Butane and Isobutane , 2006 .

[12]  Jorge J. Moré,et al.  User Guide for Minpack-1 , 1980 .

[13]  Ş. Şimşek,et al.  Developmental and environmental effects of the Kizildere geothermal power project, Turkey , 2005 .

[14]  Ian J Laurenzi,et al.  Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and freshwater consumption of Marcellus shale gas. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  Bob Fujimoto,et al.  BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT - MANAGEMENT TEAM , 2008 .

[16]  G. Norris,et al.  TRACI the tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts , 2002 .

[17]  M. J. Goedkoop.  The Eco-Indicator 98 Explained , 1998 .