Prototype Procedures to Describe Army Jobs

Abstract : Descriptions of Army jobs or Military Occupational Specialties (MOS) provide the foundation for Army personnel management, from entry-level selection and classification to training and performance management. However, existing job analysis approaches used in the Army have a number of limitations. This project represents the first step in a long-term research roadmap intended to address this issue (Campbell et al., 2007). The purpose of this project was to develop and field test a new prototype job analysis approach, customized to the Army, for describing entry-level enlisted jobs. Questionnaires measuring work and worker-oriented domains were developed and administered online to incumbents and supervisors in six MOS (N = 1,390): (a) Infantryman (11B), (b) Armor Crewman (19K), (c) Signal Support Specialist (25U), (d) Light-Wheel Vehicle Mechanic (63B), (e) Military Police (31B), and (f) Motor Transport Operator (88M). The results of the field test demonstrated that the questionnaires evidenced sufficient reliability and validity for describing enlisted jobs and feature a method that could be easily expanded Army-wide and at a reasonable cost. The report concludes with a summary of lessons learned from the field test and discussion of ways in which future research can enhance and extend the prototype approach.

[1]  Norman G. Peterson,et al.  An occupational information system for the 21st century: The development of O*NET. , 1999 .

[2]  Deirdre J Knapp,et al.  Army Enlisted Personnel Competency Assessment Program: Phase 2 Report , 2006 .

[3]  J. L. Holland,et al.  Making vocational choices : a theory of vocational personalities and work environments , 1984 .

[4]  Christopher E. Sager,et al.  Development of Experimental Army Enlisted Personnel Selection and Classification Tests and Job Performance Criteria , 2005 .

[5]  Norman G. Peterson,et al.  Army Synthetic Validity Project: Report of Phase 2 Results. Volume 1 , 1990 .

[6]  Michael D. Mumford,et al.  Development of Prototype Occupational Information Network (O*NET) Content Model. Volume I: Report [and] Volume II: Appendices. , 1995 .

[7]  U. S. Army.  Assessing Professional Competence by Using Occupational Judgment Tests Derived From Job Analysis Questionnaires , 2009 .

[8]  R. Dawis,et al.  A psychological theory of work adjustment : an individual-differences model and its applications , 1984 .

[9]  Michael Ingerick,et al.  Evaluating the O*NET Occupational Analysis System for Army Competency Development: Supplemental Appendices , 2008 .

[10]  Phil Lewis,et al.  Determining the Occupational Reinforcer Patterns for O*NET Occupational Units , 1999 .

[11]  Norman G. Peterson,et al.  U.S. Army Classification Research Panel: Conclusions and Recommendations on Classification Research Strategies , 2007 .

[12]  Walter C. Borman,et al.  Generalized work activities , 1999 .

[13]  Eleanor Dietrich,et al.  Labor Exchange Skills Project. Final Report. , 2002 .