Spatial Labor Market Frictions and Economic Convergence: Policy Implications from a Heterogeneous Agent Model

This paper studies the effectiveness of different types of cohesion policies with respect to convergence of regions. A two-region agentbased macroeconomic model is used to analyze short-, medium- and long-term effects of policies improving human capital and fostering adoption of technologies in lagging regions. With fully integrated labor markets the human capital policy positively affects the economically stronger region but reduces production in the targeted weaker region. Subsidies for high technology investment in the weaker region have a positive local output effect and a negative effect on the neighboring region, thereby fostering convergence. When labor markets are not integrated both policies support convergence.

[1]  P. Aghion,et al.  The Causal Impact of Education on Economic Growth: Evidence from U.S. , 2009 .

[2]  Herbert Dawid,et al.  Capturing Firm Behavior in Agent-based Models of Industry Evolution and Macroeconomic Dynamics , 2012 .

[3]  Susanto Basu,et al.  Appropriate Technology and Growth , 1996 .

[4]  Herbert Dawid,et al.  Labor market integration policies and the convergence of regions: the role of skills and technology diffusion , 2012 .

[5]  G. Kauermann,et al.  A Note on Penalized Spline Smoothing With Correlated Errors , 2007 .

[6]  S. Wood.  Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models , 2011 .

[7]  Naresh K. Malhotra,et al.  The Use of Linear Logit Models in Marketing Research , 1984 .

[8]  L. Argote,et al.  Learning Curves in Manufacturing , 1990, Science.

[9]  G. Dosi,et al.  Industrial structures and dynamics:evidence, interpretations and puzzles , 1997 .

[10]  Xavier Mateos-Planas,et al.  Discussion Papers in Economics and Econometrics 2000 Schooling and Distortions in a Vintage Capital Model , 2022 .

[11]  M. Raberto,et al.  Debt, Deleveraging and Business Cycles: An Agent-Based Perspective , 2012 .

[12]  J. Stock,et al.  Business Cycle Fluctuations in U.S. Macroeconomic Time Series , 1998 .

[13]  Mariacristina Piva,et al.  Corporate Skills as an Ex-Ante Incentive to R&D Investment , 2007, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[14]  P. Howitt,et al.  Banks, Market Organization, and Macroeconomic Performance: An Agent-Based Computational Analysis , 2011 .

[15]  Stephen L. Parente.  Technology adoption, learning-by-doing, and economic growth , 1994 .

[16]  S. Eijffinger,et al.  The Effectiveness of Structural Policy in the European Union: An Empirical Analysis for the Eu-15 in 1995-2001 , 2005 .

[17]  Christopher D. Carroll,et al.  INDIVIDUAL LEARNING ABOUT CONSUMPTION , 2001 .

[18]  Diego Comin,et al.  An Exploration of Technology Diffusion , 2006 .

[19]  F. Aiello,et al.  Structural Funds and Economic Divide in Italy , 2012 .

[20]  Stephen L. Parente,et al.  Barriers to Technology Adoption and Development , 1994, Journal of Political Economy.

[21]  Daron Acemoglu,et al.  Productivity Differences , 1999 .

[22]  L. Krishnamurthi,et al.  A Model of Brand Choice and Purchase Quantity Price Sensitivities , 1988 .

[23]  Harald Stahl,et al.  What Firms' Surveys Tell Us about Price-Setting Behavior in the Euro Area , 2006 .

[24]  Antoine Mandel,et al.  A multi-agent model of several economic regions , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[25]  M. Boldrin,et al.  Inequality and convergence in Europe's regions: reconsidering European regional policies , 2001 .

[26]  A Inclusion.Directorate,et al.  Employment and social developments in Europe , 2012 .

[27]  Wilbur John Coleman,et al.  The World Technology Frontier , 2000 .

[28]  Herbert Gintis,et al.  The Dynamics of General Equilibrium , 2007 .

[29]  C. Carroll,et al.  Buffer-Stock Saving and the Life Cycle/Permanent Income Hypothesis , 1996 .

[30]  Sascha O. Becker,et al.  Going NUTS: The Effect of EU Structural Funds on Regional Performance , 2008, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[31]  Mauro Gallegati,et al.  The financial accelerator in an evolving credit network , 2010 .

[32]  Peter Howitt,et al.  HOW INFLATION AFFECTS MACROECONOMIC PERFORMANCE: AN AGENT-BASED COMPUTATIONAL INVESTIGATION , 2012, Macroeconomic Dynamics.

[33]  Gerda Claeskens,et al.  Bootstrapping for Penalized Spline Regression , 2009 .

[34]  Directorate-General for Employment.  Employment in Europe 2002 , 2002 .

[35]  Henri L. F. de Groot,et al.  Fertile Soil for Structural Funds? A Panel Data Analysis of the Conditional Effectiveness of European Cohesion Policy , 2002 .

[36]  Thomas T. Nagle,et al.  The Strategy and Tactics of Pricing: A Guide to Growing More Profitably , 2005 .

[37]  G. Hewings,et al.  Spatial heterogeneity and interregional spillovers in the European Union: Do cohesion policies encourage convergence across regions? , 2008 .

[38]  David F. Pyke,et al.  Inventory management and production planning and scheduling , 1998 .

[39]  H. Dawid,et al.  The Eurace@Unibi Model: An Agent-Based Macroeconomic Model for Economic Policy Analysis , 2012 .

[40]  Nazrul Islam,et al.  What have We Learnt from the Convergence Debate , 2003 .

[41]  G. Glomm,et al.  Growth Effects of Spatial Redistribution Policies , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[42]  D. Acemoglu.  Why Do New Technologies Complement Skills? Directed Technical Change and Wage Inequality , 1998 .

[43]  G. Dosi,et al.  Schumpeter meeting Keynes: A policy-friendly model of endogenous growth and business cycles , 2010 .

[44]  Jasmina Arifovic,et al.  Social Learning and Monetary Policy Rules , 2007 .

[45]  D. Comin,et al.  Technology Diffusion and Postwar Growth , 2010, NBER Macroeconomics Annual.

[46]  Fulvio Castellacci,et al.  Working paper nr 12: The Impact of regional support on growth and convergence in the European Union , 2003 .