PET Molecular Imaging: A Holistic Review of Current Practice and Emerging Perspectives for Diagnosis, Therapeutic Evaluation and Prognosis in Clinical Oncology

PET/CT molecular imaging has been imposed in clinical oncological practice over the past 20 years, driven by its two well-grounded foundations: quantification and radiolabeled molecular probe vectorization. From basic visual interpretation to more sophisticated full kinetic modeling, PET technology provides a unique opportunity to characterize various biological processes with different levels of analysis. In clinical practice, many efforts have been made during the last two decades to standardize image analyses at the international level, but advanced metrics are still under use in practice. In parallel, the integration of PET imaging with radionuclide therapy, also known as radiolabeled theranostics, has paved the way towards highly sensitive radionuclide-based precision medicine, with major breakthroughs emerging in neuroendocrine tumors and prostate cancer. PET imaging of tumor immunity and beyond is also emerging, emphasizing the unique capabilities of PET molecular imaging to constantly adapt to emerging oncological challenges. However, these new horizons face the growing complexity of multidimensional data. In the era of precision medicine, statistical and computer sciences are currently revolutionizing image-based decision making, paving the way for more holistic cancer molecular imaging analyses at the whole-body level.

[1]  Annette Kopp-Schneider,et al.  The role of interim 18F-FDG PET/CT in prediction of response to ipilimumab treatment in metastatic melanoma , 2018, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[2]  Barry A Siegel,et al.  Impact of positron emission tomography/computed tomography and positron emission tomography (PET) alone on expected management of patients with cancer: initial results from the National Oncologic PET Registry. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  I. Modlin,et al.  A 5‐decade analysis of 13,715 carcinoid tumors , 2003, Cancer.

[4]  M. Hofman,et al.  Guidelines on nuclear medicine imaging in neuroblastoma , 2018, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[5]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries , 2018, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[6]  P. Marsden,et al.  False Discovery Rates in PET and CT Studies with Texture Features: A Systematic Review , 2015, PloS one.

[7]  C. Nanni,et al.  Image interpretation criteria for FDG PET/CT in multiple myeloma: a new proposal from an Italian expert panel. IMPeTUs (Italian Myeloma criteria for PET USe) , 2016, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[8]  N. Lawrentschuk,et al.  Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multicentre study , 2020, The Lancet.

[9]  S. Baylin,et al.  Cancer epigenetics: tumor heterogeneity, plasticity of stem-like states, and drug resistance. , 2014, Molecular cell.

[10]  J. Berlin,et al.  Phase 3 Trial of 177Lu‐Dotatate for Midgut Neuroendocrine Tumors , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  R. Hicks,et al.  FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY ON STAGING AND MANAGEMENT OF EARLY-STAGE FOLLICULAR NON-HODGKIN LYMPHOMA , 2022 .

[12]  John O. Prior,et al.  Early prediction of response to sunitinib after imatinib failure by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  Slave Trajanoski,et al.  Heterogeneity of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) Expression in Prostate Carcinoma with Distant Metastasis , 2009, Pathology & Oncology Research.

[14]  Dimitris Visvikis,et al.  Harmonization strategies for multicenter radiomics investigations , 2020, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  K. Nackaerts,et al.  Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of 111In-pentetreotide SPECT and 68Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT: A lesion-by-lesion analysis in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumours , 2016, European Radiology.

[16]  L. Cantley,et al.  Understanding the Warburg Effect: The Metabolic Requirements of Cell Proliferation , 2009, Science.

[17]  R. Steenbakkers,et al.  The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative: Standardized Quantitative Radiomics for High-Throughput Image-based Phenotyping. , 2020, Radiology.

[18]  T. Watabe,et al.  Theranostics Targeting Fibroblast Activation Protein in the Tumor Stroma: 64Cu- and 225Ac-Labeled FAPI-04 in Pancreatic Cancer Xenograft Mouse Models , 2019, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[19]  V. Servois,et al.  Novel patterns of response under immunotherapy , 2019, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[20]  A. López-Guillermo,et al.  Interim FDG PET/CT as a prognostic factor in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma , 2013, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[21]  A. Popel Immunoactivating the tumor microenvironment enhances immunotherapy as predicted by integrative computational model , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Kenji Hirata,et al.  A convolutional neural network-based system to classify patients using FDG PET/CT examinations , 2020, BMC Cancer.

[23]  J. Thie Understanding the standardized uptake value, its methods, and implications for usage. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[24]  V. Goh,et al.  Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with PET Imaging Using Convolutional Neural Networks , 2015, PloS one.

[25]  B. Barlogie,et al.  Assessment of Total Lesion Glycolysis by 18F FDG PET/CT Significantly Improves Prognostic Value of GEP and ISS in Myeloma , 2016, Clinical Cancer Research.

[26]  R. Boellaard Standards for PET Image Acquisition and Quantitative Data Analysis , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[27]  Joel S. Karp,et al.  PennPET Explorer: Design and Preliminary Performance of a Whole-Body Imager , 2019, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[28]  C. Comtat,et al.  18F-FDG PET and DCE kinetic modeling and their correlations in primary NSCLC: first voxel-wise correlative analysis of human simultaneous [18F]FDG PET-MRI data , 2020, EJNMMI Research.

[29]  Nizar A. Mullani,et al.  Tumor Blood Flow Measured by PET Dynamic Imaging of First-Pass 18F-FDG Uptake: A Comparison with 15O-Labeled Water-Measured Blood Flow , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[30]  M. Soussan,et al.  Monitoring anti-PD-1-based immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer with FDG PET: introduction of iPERCIST , 2019, EJNMMI Research.

[31]  D. Murphy,et al.  [177Lu]-PSMA-617 radionuclide treatment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (LuPSMA trial): a single-centre, single-arm, phase 2 study. , 2018, The Lancet. Oncology.

[32]  J. Armitage,et al.  Report of an international workshop to standardize response criteria for non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. NCI Sponsored International Working Group. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[33]  D K Owens,et al.  Accuracy of positron emission tomography for diagnosis of pulmonary nodules and mass lesions: a meta-analysis. , 2001, JAMA.

[34]  P. Barata,et al.  PSMA Theranostics: Review of the Current Status of PSMA-Targeted Imaging and Radioligand Therapy , 2020, Cancers.

[35]  M. Davenport,et al.  Imaging of Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen Targeted Radiotracers for the Detection of Prostate Cancer Biochemical Recurrence after Definitive Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. , 2019, The Journal of urology.

[36]  C. Boy,et al.  68Ga-DOTATOC Versus 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT in Functional Imaging of Neuroendocrine Tumors , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[37]  R. Jain,et al.  Reprogramming the Tumor Microenvironment to Improve Immunotherapy: Emerging Strategies and Combination Therapies. , 2019, American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting.

[38]  K. Herholz,et al.  Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group. , 1999, European journal of cancer.

[39]  G. Chiro Positron emission tomography using [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose in brain tumors. A powerful diagnostic and prognostic tool. , 1987 .

[40]  I. Buvat,et al.  Comparative Assessment of Methods for Estimating Tumor Volume and Standardized Uptake Value in 18F-FDG PET , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[41]  R. Weinberg,et al.  Understanding the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) for effective therapy , 2018, Nature Medicine.

[42]  Joel Karp,et al.  Consensus recommendations for the use of 18F-FDG PET as an indicator of therapeutic response in patients in National Cancer Institute Trials. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[43]  M. Cuggia,et al.  High Prognostic Value of 18F-FDG PET for Metastatic Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Long-Term Evaluation , 2014, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[44]  Eric J. W. Visser,et al.  FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0 , 2014, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[45]  Patrick Granton,et al.  Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. , 2012, European journal of cancer.

[46]  Michele Larobina,et al.  Metabolic Tumor Volume Assessed by 18F-FDG PET/CT for the Prediction of Outcome in Patients with Multiple Myeloma , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[47]  P. Carroll,et al.  Assessment of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET Accuracy in Localizing Recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Prospective Single-Arm Clinical Trial. , 2019, JAMA oncology.

[48]  Xiang Li,et al.  Deep Learning-Based Image Segmentation on Multimodal Medical Imaging , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences.

[49]  D. Bostwick,et al.  Prostate-specific membrane antigen expression is greatest in prostate adenocarcinoma and lymph node metastases. , 1998, Urology.

[50]  D. Hanahan,et al.  Hallmarks of Cancer: The Next Generation , 2011, Cell.

[51]  Emmanuel Itti,et al.  Early 18F-FDG PET for Prediction of Prognosis in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma: SUV-Based Assessment Versus Visual Analysis , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[52]  M. Boers,et al.  Effectiveness of positron emission tomography in the preoperative assessment of patients with suspected non-small-cell lung cancer: the PLUS multicentre randomised trial , 2002, The Lancet.

[53]  Steven P Rowe,et al.  Prediction of Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy Using Early-Time-Point 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging in Patients with Advanced Melanoma , 2017, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[54]  L. Breimer,et al.  Somatostatin receptor PET/CT in neuroendocrine tumours: update on systematic review and meta-analysis , 2013, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[55]  M. Reivich,et al.  THE [14C]DEOXYGLUCOSE METHOD FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF LOCAL CEREBRAL GLUCOSE UTILIZATION: THEORY, PROCEDURE, AND NORMAL VALUES IN THE CONSCIOUS AND ANESTHETIZED ALBINO RAT 1 , 1977, Journal of neurochemistry.

[56]  David A. Mankoff,et al.  PET/CT imaging in cancer: Current applications and future directions , 2014, Cancer.

[57]  O. Nanni,et al.  Role of 18FDG PET/CT in patients treated with 177Lu-DOTATATE for advanced differentiated neuroendocrine tumours , 2013, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[58]  B. Barlogie,et al.  Prognostic implications of serial 18-fluoro-deoxyglucose emission tomography in multiple myeloma treated with total therapy 3. , 2013, Blood.

[59]  E. Hindié,et al.  Modern Nuclear Imaging for Paragangliomas: Beyond SPECT , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[60]  U. Haberkorn,et al.  Radiation Dosimetry and Biodistribution of 68Ga-FAPI-46 PET Imaging in Cancer Patients , 2019, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[61]  C. Truillet,et al.  PET imaging of immune checkpoint proteins in oncology. , 2020, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[62]  J. Berlin,et al.  NCCN Guidelines Insights: Neuroendocrine and Adrenal Tumors, Version 2.2018. , 2018, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[63]  Qiyong Ding,et al.  PET/CT evaluation of response to chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: PET response criteria in solid tumors (PERCIST) versus response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST). , 2014, Journal of thoracic disease.

[64]  H. Saji,et al.  Synthesis and Biologic Evaluation of Novel 18F-Labeled Probes Targeting Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen for PET of Prostate Cancer , 2016, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[65]  Alexandre Cochet,et al.  Evaluation of Breast Tumor Blood Flow with Dynamic First-Pass 18F-FDG PET/CT: Comparison with Angiogenesis Markers and Prognostic Factors , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[66]  Guobao Wang,et al.  Total-Body Dynamic Reconstruction and Parametric Imaging on the uEXPLORER , 2019, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[67]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  Metabolic imaging predicts response, survival, and recurrence in adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[68]  G. Cheon,et al.  Neuroendocrine differentiation of prostate cancer leads to PSMA suppression. , 2019, Endocrine-related cancer.

[69]  S. Fanti,et al.  FDG PET/CT for assessing tumour response to immunotherapy , 2018, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[70]  W. Klapper,et al.  Positron Emission Tomography-Guided Therapy of Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas (PETAL): A Multicenter, Randomized Phase III Trial. , 2018, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[71]  N. Patronas,et al.  Functional imaging of SDHx-related head and neck paragangliomas: comparison of 18F-fluorodihydroxyphenylalanine, 18F-fluorodopamine, 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose PET, 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy, and 111In-pentetreotide scintigraphy. , 2011, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[72]  A. Padhani,et al.  Multiparametric imaging of tumor response to therapy. , 2010, Radiology.

[73]  B. Spottiswoode,et al.  18F-FDG PET/CT Uptake Classification in Lymphoma and Lung Cancer by Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. , 2019, Radiology.

[74]  Frederik L. Giesel,et al.  68Ga-FAPI PET/CT: Tracer Uptake in 28 Different Kinds of Cancer , 2019, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[75]  I. El Naqa,et al.  A radiomics model from joint FDG-PET and MRI texture features for the prediction of lung metastases in soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[76]  R. Gillies,et al.  Repeatability and Reproducibility of Radiomic Features: A Systematic Review , 2018, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[77]  A. Buck,et al.  68Ga-PSMA I&T PET/CT for primary staging of prostate cancer , 2019, Nuklearmedizin.

[78]  V. Seshan,et al.  Response Rates to Anti-PD-1 Immunotherapy in Microsatellite-Stable Solid Tumors With 10 or More Mutations per Megabase. , 2021, JAMA oncology.

[79]  Binsheng Zhao,et al.  Assessment of Imaging Modalities and Response Metrics in Ewing Sarcoma: Correlation With Survival. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[80]  C S Patlak,et al.  Graphical Evaluation of Blood-to-Brain Transfer Constants from Multiple-Time Uptake Data , 1983, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[81]  Bruce D Cheson,et al.  Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[82]  R. Boellaard,et al.  Effects of noise, image resolution, and ROI definition on the accuracy of standard uptake values: a simulation study. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[83]  R. Boellaard,et al.  EANM/EARL harmonization strategies in PET quantification: from daily practice to multicentre oncological studies , 2017, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[84]  M. Kreissl,et al.  Prognostic analysis of interim 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma after one cycle versus two cycles of chemotherapy , 2018, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[85]  Annette Kopp-Schneider,et al.  Absolute number of new lesions on 18F-FDG PET/CT is more predictive of clinical response than SUV changes in metastatic melanoma patients receiving ipilimumab , 2018, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[86]  Issam El Naqa,et al.  The big data effort in radiation oncology: Data mining or data farming? , 2016, Advances in radiation oncology.

[87]  H. Aerts,et al.  Applications and limitations of radiomics , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[88]  Roger Slavik,et al.  18F-fluciclovine PET-CT and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT in patients with early biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy: a prospective, single-centre, single-arm, comparative imaging trial. , 2019, The Lancet. Oncology.

[89]  Charles Ferté,et al.  Hyperprogressive Disease Is a New Pattern of Progression in Cancer Patients Treated by Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 , 2016, Clinical Cancer Research.

[90]  J Nuyts,et al.  18FDG-Positron emission tomography for the early prediction of response in advanced soft tissue sarcoma treated with imatinib mesylate (Glivec). , 2003, European journal of cancer.

[91]  J. Bucerius,et al.  Diagnostic performance of whole body dual modality 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging for N- and M-staging of malignant melanoma: experience with 250 consecutive patients. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[92]  Vinay Prasad,et al.  Estimation of the Percentage of US Patients With Cancer Who Are Eligible for and Respond to Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy Drugs , 2019, JAMA network open.

[93]  P. Schöffski,et al.  Biokinetics and imaging with the somatostatin receptor PET radioligand 68Ga-DOTATOC: preliminary data , 2001, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[94]  A. Krasinskas,et al.  The High-grade (WHO G3) Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Category Is Morphologically and Biologically Heterogenous and Includes Both Well Differentiated and Poorly Differentiated Neoplasms , 2015, The American journal of surgical pathology.

[95]  E. P. Krenning,et al.  LOCALISATION OF ENDOCRINE-RELATED TUMOURS WITH RADIOIODINATED ANALOGUE OF SOMATOSTATIN , 1989, The Lancet.

[96]  L. Schwartz,et al.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). , 2009, European journal of cancer.

[97]  Ulas Bagci,et al.  A review on segmentation of positron emission tomography images , 2014, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[98]  G. Delso,et al.  Performance Measurements of the Siemens mMR Integrated Whole-Body PET/MR Scanner , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[99]  E. Puré,et al.  Cancer-associated fibroblasts and their influence on tumor immunity and immunotherapy , 2020, eLife.

[100]  W. Wilson,et al.  International Working Group consensus response evaluation criteria in lymphoma (RECIL 2017) , 2017, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[101]  R. Modzelewski,et al.  Evaluation of an Automatic Classification Algorithm Using Convolutional Neural Networks in Oncological Positron Emission Tomography , 2021, Frontiers in Medicine.

[102]  Whole body PD-1 and PD-L1 positron emission tomography in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer , 2018, Nature Communications.

[103]  R. Wahl,et al.  From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[104]  X. Ling,et al.  Comparison of RECIST, EORTC criteria and PERCIST for evaluation of early response to chemotherapy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer , 2016, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[105]  E. Adang,et al.  The diagnostic accuracy of CT and MRI in the staging of pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. , 2008, Clinical radiology.

[106]  V. Prasad,et al.  Estimation of the Percentage of US Patients With Cancer Who Are Eligible for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Drugs , 2020, JAMA network open.

[107]  F. Turkheimer,et al.  Kinetic modeling in positron emission tomography. , 2002, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology.

[108]  Steve Y. Cho,et al.  PSMA-Based [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT Is Superior to Conventional Imaging for Lesion Detection in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer , 2016, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[109]  M. Postow,et al.  Treatment of the Immune-Related Adverse Effects of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Review. , 2016, JAMA oncology.

[110]  C. Stief,et al.  68Ga-PSMA PET/CT Detects the Location and Extent of Primary Prostate Cancer , 2016, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[111]  V. Sossi,et al.  Quantitative PET in the 2020s: a roadmap , 2020, Physics in medicine and biology.

[112]  P. Castaldi,et al.  Diagnostic performance of 18F-dihydroxyphenylalanine positron emission tomography in patients with paraganglioma: a meta-analysis , 2012, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[113]  S. Fanti,et al.  11C-Choline PET/CT for restaging prostate cancer. Results from 4,426 scans in a single-centre patient series , 2016, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[114]  P. A. Futreal,et al.  Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[115]  Pengcheng Hu,et al.  First Human Imaging Studies with the EXPLORER Total-Body PET Scanner* , 2019, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[116]  James M. Kelly,et al.  Synthesis and pre-clinical evaluation of a new class of high-affinity 18F-labeled PSMA ligands for detection of prostate cancer by PET imaging , 2016, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[117]  B. Coiffier,et al.  SUVmax reduction improves early prognosis value of interim positron emission tomography scans in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. , 2011, Blood.

[118]  K. Bujko,et al.  Impact of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET-CT staging on treatment planning in radiotherapy incorporating elective nodal irradiation for non-small-cell lung cancer: a prospective study. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[119]  H. Sorbye,et al.  ENETS Consensus Guidelines for High-Grade Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors and Neuroendocrine Carcinomas , 2016, Neuroendocrinology.

[120]  Daniela A. Ferraro,et al.  Diagnostic performance of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI-guided biopsy in patients with suspected prostate cancer: a prospective single-center study , 2021, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[121]  M. Stockler,et al.  [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 versus cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (TheraP): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial , 2021, The Lancet.

[122]  P. Carroll,et al.  Impact of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET on the Management of Recurrent Prostate Cancer in a Prospective Single-Arm Clinical Trial , 2020, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[123]  W. Wilson,et al.  Prognostic Value of Interim FDG-PET in Diffuse Large Cell Lymphoma: Results from the CALGB 50303 Clinical Trial. , 2020, Blood.

[124]  S Yoshioka,et al.  Lung tumor imaging by positron emission tomography using C-11 L-methionine. , 1985, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[125]  Lale Kostakoglu,et al.  PET/CT Imaging , 2011 .

[126]  V. Lowe,et al.  Prostate cancer-specific PET radiotracers: A review on the clinical utility in recurrent disease. , 2018, Practical radiation oncology.

[127]  G. Parker,et al.  Imaging Intratumor Heterogeneity: Role in Therapy Response, Resistance, and Clinical Outcome , 2014, Clinical Cancer Research.

[128]  L. Schwartz,et al.  Prognostic and theranostic 18F-FDG PET biomarkers for anti-PD1 immunotherapy in metastatic melanoma: association with outcome and transcriptomics , 2019, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[129]  F. Calabria,et al.  PET/CT with 18F-choline after radical prostatectomy in patients with PSA ≤2 ng/ml. Can PSA velocity and PSA doubling time help in patient selection? , 2016, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[130]  Zhonghua Chen,et al.  Comparison of machine learning methods for classifying mediastinal lymph node metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer from 18F-FDG PET/CT images , 2017, EJNMMI Research.

[131]  H. Tilly,et al.  An international confirmatory study of the prognostic value of early PET/CT in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: comparison between Deauville criteria and ΔSUVmax , 2013, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[132]  S. Fanti,et al.  ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the Standards of Care in Neuroendocrine Tumors: Radiological, Nuclear Medicine and Hybrid Imaging , 2017, Neuroendocrinology.

[133]  J. Bucerius,et al.  Diagnostic Performance of Whole Body Dual Modality 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging for N- and M-Staging of Malignant Melanoma: Experience With 250 Consecutive Patients , 2006 .

[134]  Finbarr O'Sullivan,et al.  A statistical measure of tissue heterogeneity with application to 3D PET sarcoma data. , 2003, Biostatistics.

[135]  M. Gönen,et al.  Comparison of FDG-PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT for monitoring therapy response in patients with metastatic breast cancer , 2017, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[136]  Issam El-Naqa,et al.  Exploring feature-based approaches in PET images for predicting cancer treatment outcomes , 2009, Pattern Recognit..

[137]  Cesare Guida,et al.  18F-FDG PET is an early predictor of pathologic tumor response to preoperative radiochemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[138]  R. Lhommel,et al.  Quantitative and qualitative analysis of metabolic response at interim positron emission tomography scan combined with International Prognostic Index is highly predictive of outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma , 2014, Leukemia and Lymphoma.

[139]  E. P. Krenning,et al.  Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy with [111In-DTPA-d-Phe1]- and [123I-Tyr3]-octreotide: the Rotterdam experience with more than 1000 patients , 1993, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[140]  T. Watabe,et al.  Evaluation of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Esophageal Cancer: PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors Versus Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[141]  R. Fisher,et al.  Role of imaging in the staging and response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the International Conference on Malignant Lymphomas Imaging Working Group. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[142]  R. Advani,et al.  Refinement of the Lugano Classification lymphoma response criteria in the era of immunomodulatory therapy. , 2016, Blood.

[143]  Ian Law,et al.  Joint EANM/EANO/RANO practice guidelines/SNMMI procedure standards for imaging of gliomas using PET with radiolabelled amino acids and [18F]FDG: version 1.0 , 2018, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[144]  P. Sonneveld,et al.  Standardization of 18F-FDG PET/CT According to Deauville Criteria for MRD Evaluation in Newly Diagnosed Transplant Eligible Multiple Myeloma Patients: Joined Analysis of Two Prospective Randomized Phase III Trials , 2018, Blood.

[145]  Udochukwu Oyoyo,et al.  PSMA-targeted Radiotracers versus 18F Fluciclovine for the Detection of Prostate Cancer Biochemical Recurrence after Definitive Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. , 2020, Radiology.

[146]  M. Kohli,et al.  Response criteria in oncologic imaging: review of traditional and new criteria. , 2013, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[147]  Ronald Boellaard,et al.  89Zr-atezolizumab imaging as a non-invasive approach to assess clinical response to PD-L1 blockade in cancer , 2018, Nature Medicine.

[148]  Hua Wu,et al.  Usefulness of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT in patients presenting with inconclusive [18F]FDG PET/CT findings , 2020, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[149]  P. Carroll,et al.  Metaanalysis of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET Accuracy for the Detection of Prostate Cancer Validated by Histopathology , 2018, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[150]  G. Kaltsas,et al.  ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the Standards of Care in Neuroendocrine Tumors: Radiological Examinations , 2008, Neuroendocrinology.

[151]  M. Beksac,et al.  Impact of PET-CT Response on Survival Parameters Following Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Among Patients with Multiple Myeloma: Comparison of Two Cut-Off Values , 2014 .

[152]  Leyun Pan,et al.  Kinetic modeling and parametric imaging with dynamic PET for oncological applications: general considerations, current clinical applications, and future perspectives , 2020, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[153]  Hans Erik Johnsen,et al.  International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[154]  Hua Wu,et al.  68Ga-fibroblast activation protein inhibitor PET/CT on gross tumour volume delineation for radiotherapy planning of oesophageal cancer. , 2021, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[155]  C. Patlak,et al.  Graphical Evaluation of Blood-to-Brain Transfer Constants from Multiple-Time Uptake Data. Generalizations , 1985, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[156]  U. Haberkorn,et al.  E-PSMA: the EANM standardized reporting guidelines v1.0 for PSMA-PET , 2021, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[157]  Artificial intelligence for reduced dose 18F-FDG PET examinations: a real-world deployment through a standardized framework and business case assessment , 2021, EJNMMI Physics.

[158]  Sigrid Stroobants,et al.  Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. , 2007, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[159]  A. Kishan,et al.  Identifying the Best Candidates for Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography as the Primary Staging Approach Among Men with High-risk Prostate Cancer and Negative Conventional Imaging. , 2021, European urology oncology.

[160]  D. Jäger,et al.  A Tumor-Imaging Method Targeting Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts , 2018, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[161]  R. Coleman,et al.  The National Oncologic PET Registry: expanded medicare coverage for PET under coverage with evidence development. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[162]  R. Gillies,et al.  Radiomics of 18F-FDG PET/CT images predicts clinical benefit of advanced NSCLC patients to checkpoint blockade immunotherapy , 2019, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[163]  U. Haberkorn,et al.  Preclinical Evaluation of 18F-PSMA-1007, a New Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Ligand for Prostate Cancer Imaging , 2017, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[164]  W. Oyen,et al.  Medical imaging and nuclear medicine: a Lancet Oncology Commission. , 2021, The Lancet. Oncology.

[165]  Gary S Collins,et al.  Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD Statement , 2015, BMC Medicine.

[166]  Kaoru Tanaka,et al.  Association of Immune-Related Adverse Events With Nivolumab Efficacy in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer , 2017, JAMA oncology.

[167]  H. West JAMA Oncology Patient Page. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. , 2015, JAMA oncology.

[168]  C. Cordon-Cardo,et al.  Prostate-specific membrane antigen expression in normal and malignant human tissues. , 1997, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[169]  J. Berlin,et al.  Neuroendocrine and adrenal tumors, version 2.2018 featured updates to the nccn guidelines , 2018 .

[170]  E. Song,et al.  Turning foes to friends: targeting cancer-associated fibroblasts , 2018, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[171]  J. Jais,et al.  FDG-PET-driven consolidation strategy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: final results of a randomized phase 2 study. , 2017, Blood.

[172]  Frederik L. Giesel,et al.  68Ga-FAPI PET/CT: Biodistribution and Preliminary Dosimetry Estimate of 2 DOTA-Containing FAP-Targeting Agents in Patients with Various Cancers , 2018, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[173]  D. Rubello,et al.  Choline PET or PET/CT and Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2013, Clinical nuclear medicine.

[174]  Davide Chicco,et al.  Ten quick tips for machine learning in computational biology , 2017, BioData Mining.

[175]  E. Demirci,et al.  177Lu-DOTATATE therapy in patients with neuroendocrine tumours including high-grade (WHO G3) neuroendocrine tumours: response to treatment and long-term survival update , 2018, Nuclear medicine communications.

[176]  M. Dietzel,et al.  A decade of radiomics research: are images really data or just patterns in the noise? , 2020, European Radiology.

[177]  M. Soussan,et al.  A Postreconstruction Harmonization Method for Multicenter Radiomic Studies in PET , 2018, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[178]  M. Lubberink,et al.  Quantitative and Qualitative Intrapatient Comparison of 68Ga-DOTATOC and 68Ga-DOTATATE: Net Uptake Rate for Accurate Quantification , 2014, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.