How the brain learns to see objects and faces in an impoverished context

A degraded image of an object or face, which appearsmeaningless when seen for the first time, is easily recognizableafter viewing an undegraded version of the same image. The neural mechanisms by whichthis form of rapid perceptual learning facilitates perception are notwell understood. Psychological theory suggests the involvementof systems for processing stimulus attributes, spatial attentionand feature binding,as well as those involved in visual imagery. Here we investigate where andhow this rapid perceptual learning is expressed in the human brain byusing functional neuroimaging to measure brain activity duringexposure to degraded images before and after exposure to thecorresponding undegraded versions (Fig. 1). Perceptuallearning of faces or objects enhanced the activity of inferiortemporal regions known to be involved in face and object recognitionrespectively. In addition, both faceand object learning led to increased activity in medial and lateralparietal regions that have been implicated in attention and visual imagery. We observed a strong couplingbetween the temporal face area and the medial parietal cortexwhen, and only when, faces were perceived. Thissuggests that perceptual learning involves direct interactions betweenareas involved in face recognition and those involved in spatialattention, feature binding and memoryrecall.

[1]  M. Sanders Handbook of Sensory Physiology , 1975 .

[2]  D. B. Bender,et al.  Activity of inferior temporal neurons in behaving monkeys , 1979, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  R. Desimone,et al.  Visual areas in the temporal cortex of the macaque , 1979, Brain Research.

[4]  R. Desimone,et al.  Selective attention gates visual processing in the extrastriate cortex. , 1985, Science.

[5]  K. Tanaka,et al.  Analysis of local and wide-field movements in the superior temporal visual areas of the macaque monkey , 1986, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[6]  A. Treisman Features and Objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[7]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[8]  M. Posner,et al.  The attention system of the human brain. , 1990, Annual review of neuroscience.

[9]  Nick Watson,et al.  Analysis of behaviour , 1991 .

[10]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Coding visual images of objects in the inferotemporal cortex of the macaque monkey. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Neural organization for the long-term memory of paired associates , 1991, Nature.

[12]  R. Desimone,et al.  A neural mechanism for working and recognition memory in inferior temporal cortex. , 1991, Science.

[13]  R. Desimone,et al.  The representation of stimulus familiarity in anterior inferior temporal cortex. , 1993, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Neuronal tuning to learned complex forms in vision. , 1994, Neuroreport.

[15]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The functional organization of human extrastriate cortex: a PET-rCBF study of selective attention to faces and locations , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  Combined spatial and temporal imaging of brain activity during visual selective attention in humans , 1994, Nature.

[17]  S. Kosslyn Image and brain: the resolution of the imagery debate , 1994 .

[18]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[19]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Brain regions associated with acquisition and retrieval of verbal episodic memory , 1994, Nature.

[20]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  The Mind's Eye—Precuneus Activation in Memory-Related Imagery , 1995, NeuroImage.

[21]  D. Sagi,et al.  Common mechanisms of visual imagery and perception. , 1995, Science.

[22]  R. Malach,et al.  Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Richard L Gregory,et al.  The artful eye , 1995 .

[24]  A. Treisman,et al.  Parietal contributions to visual feature binding: evidence from a patient with bilateral lesions , 1995, Science.

[25]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Where in the brain does visual attention select the forest and the trees? , 1996, Nature.

[26]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  Rapid visual learning in neurones of the primate temporal visual cortex. , 1996, Neuroreport.

[27]  J. Haxby,et al.  Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Human Visual Cortex during Face Matching: A Comparison with Positron Emission Tomography , 1996, NeuroImage.

[28]  Karl J. Friston Testing for anatomically specified regional effects , 1997, Human brain mapping.

[29]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  W. Singer,et al.  Visuomotor integration is associated with zero time-lag synchronization among cortical areas , 1997, Nature.