Unexceptional sharpness of frequency tuning in the human cochlea.

The responses to sound of auditory-nerve fibers are well known in many animals but are topics of conjecture for humans. Some investigators have claimed that the auditory-nerve fibers of humans are more sharply tuned than are those of various experimental animals. Here we invalidate such claims. First, we show that forward-masking psychophysical tuning curves, which were used as the principal support for those claims, greatly overestimate the sharpness of cochlear tuning in experimental animals and, hence, also probably in humans. Second, we calibrate compound action potential tuning curves against the tuning of auditory-nerve fibers in experimental animals and use compound action potential tuning curves recorded in humans to show that the sharpness of tuning in human cochleae is not exceptional and that it is actually similar to tuning in all mammals and birds for which comparisons are possible. Third, we note that the similarity of frequency of tuning across species with widely diverse cochlear lengths and auditory bandwidths implies that for any given stimulus frequency the "cochlear amplifier" is confined to a highly localized region of the cochlea.

[1]  E. Carlier,et al.  Development of cochlear frequency selectivity tested by compound action potential tuning curves , 1979, Hearing Research.

[2]  M. Liberman,et al.  Response properties of single auditory nerve fibers in the mouse. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  J. Pickles,et al.  Psychophysical frequency resolution in the cat as determined by simultaneous masking and its relation to auditory-nerve resolution. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  B C Moore,et al.  Auditory filter shapes at 8 and 10 kHz. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  L. Robles,et al.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea. , 2001, Physiological reviews.

[6]  G. K. Martin,et al.  Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in a nonhuman primate. I. Basic features and relations to other emissions , 1988, Hearing Research.

[7]  Ray Meddis,et al.  The temporal representation of speech in a nonlinear model of the guinea pig cochlea. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  R. Fay,et al.  The Mammalian auditory pathway : neurophysiology , 1992 .

[9]  B. M. Johnstone,et al.  Absence of tonic activity of the crossed olivocochlear bundle in determining compound action potential thresholds, amplitudes and masking phenomena in anaesthetised guinea pigs with normal hearing sensitivities , 1990, Hearing Research.

[10]  B. Moore Psychophysical tuning curves measured in simultaneous and forward masking. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  P. D. Manley,et al.  Peripheral Hearing Mechanisms in Reptiles and Birds , 1990, Zoophysiology.

[12]  D D Dirks,et al.  Auditory filter characteristics and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  Andrew J. Oxenham,et al.  Estimates of Human Cochlear Tuning at Low Levels Using Forward and Simultaneous Masking , 2003, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[14]  B. Moore,et al.  Refining the measurement of psychophysical tuning curves. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Brian R Glasberg,et al.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data , 1990, Hearing Research.

[16]  R. Salvi,et al.  Comparison of psychophysical and evoked-potential tuning curves in the chinchilla. , 1982, American journal of otolaryngology.

[17]  E D Young,et al.  Discharge patterns of single fibers in the pigeon auditory nerve. , 1974, Brain research.

[18]  B. Moore,et al.  Auditory filter shapes at low center frequencies. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  D. D. Greenwood A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  M. Cheatham,et al.  Cochlear function in Prestin knockout mice , 2004, The Journal of physiology.

[21]  A. Cody,et al.  Acoustic lesions in the mammalian cochlea: Implications for the spatial distribution of the ‘active process’ , 1992, Hearing Research.

[22]  G. Smoorenburg,et al.  Eighth-nerve action-potential tuning curves in cats before and after inducement of an acute noise trauma , 1981, Hearing Research.

[23]  B. Moore,et al.  Suggested formulae for calculating auditory-filter bandwidths and excitation patterns. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  D. Moody,et al.  Frequency selectivity of the monkey's auditory system: psychophysical tuning curves. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  W. Shofner,et al.  Behavioral measures of frequency selectivity in the chinchilla. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  B C Moore,et al.  Auditory filter shapes derived in simultaneous and forward masking. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  E M Relkin,et al.  A reexamination of forward masking in the auditory nerve. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  J M Aran,et al.  AP tuning curves from normal and pathological human and guinea pig cochleas. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  J. Saunders,et al.  Frequency selectivity in bird and man: A comparison among critical ratios, critical bands and psychophysical tuning curves , 1979, Hearing Research.

[30]  Jean W. T. Smolders,et al.  A functional map of the pigeon basilar papilla: correlation of the properties of single auditory nerve fibres and their peripheral origin , 1995, Hearing Research.

[31]  F. Telischi,et al.  Suppression and enhancement of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions by interference tones above f 2. I. Basic findings in rabbits , 1999, Hearing Research.

[32]  O. Gleich Auditory primary afferents in the starling: Correlation of function and morphology , 1989, Hearing Research.

[33]  J. Zwislocki Auditory system: Peripheral nonlinearity and central additivity, as revealed in the human stapedius-muscle reflex , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  Generation of DPOAEs in the guinea pig , 2003, Hearing Research.

[35]  M. Liberman,et al.  Intracellular labeling of auditory nerve fibers in guinea pig: central and peripheral projections , 1997 .

[36]  Christopher A Shera,et al.  Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  R. Patterson,et al.  Sinusoidal and noise maskers in simultaneous and forward masking. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[38]  M. Sands,et al.  Inner ear pathology in the mucopolysaccharidosis VII mouse , 2002, Hearing Research.

[39]  P Dallos,et al.  Compound action potential (AP) tuning curves. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[40]  Pierre Bonfils,et al.  Efferent tracts and cochlear frequency selectivity , 1986, Hearing Research.

[41]  Reduction in Sharpness of Frequency Tuning but not Endocochlear Potential in Aging and Noise-Exposed BALB/cJ Mice , 2002, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[42]  W. Rutten The influence of cochlear hearing loss and probe tone level on compound action potential tuning curves in humans , 1986, Hearing Research.

[43]  J. E. Rose,et al.  Some effects of stimulus intensity on response of auditory nerve fibers in the squirrel monkey. , 1971, Journal of neurophysiology.

[44]  Alberto Recio-Spinoso,et al.  Delays of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions and cochlear vibrations contradict the theory of coherent reflection filtering. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[45]  J. Pickles An Introduction to the Physiology of Hearing , 1982 .

[46]  C. Fowler,et al.  Tuning curves of cochlear and brainstem responses in the guinea pig. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[47]  B. Delgutte,et al.  Pitch of complex tones: rate-place and interspike interval representations in the auditory nerve. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[48]  R. Fay,et al.  Compression: From Cochlea to Cochlear Implants , 2013, Springer Handbook of Auditory Research.

[49]  J. Saunders,et al.  Psychophysical tuning curves in the parakeet: A comparison between simultaneous and forward masking procedures , 1980 .

[50]  K. Ohlemiller,et al.  Functional correlates of characteristic frequency in single cochlear nerve fibers of the Mongolian gerbil , 1990, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[51]  L. Carney,et al.  A phenomenological model of peripheral and central neural responses to amplitude-modulated tones. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[52]  Aïda El Barbary Auditory nerve of the normal and jaundiced rat. II. Frequency selectivity and two-tone rate suppression , 1991, Hearing Research.

[53]  Robert H Withnell,et al.  Delay dependence for the origin of the nonlinear derived transient evoked otoacoustic emission. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[54]  Jozef J. Zwislocki,et al.  Auditory Sound Transmission: An Autobiographical Perspective , 2002 .

[55]  M. Liberman,et al.  Auditory-nerve response from cats raised in a low-noise chamber. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[56]  J. H. Mills,et al.  A comparison of brainstem, whole-nerve AP and single-fiber tuning curves in the gerbil: Normative data , 1985, Hearing Research.

[57]  J. Saunders,et al.  Threshold Sensitivity and Frequency Selectivity Measured with Round Window Whole Nerve Action Potentials in the Awake, Restrained Chinchilla , 1987, Otolaryngology Head & Neck Surgery.

[58]  G. A. Manley,et al.  Activity patterns of cochlear ganglion neurones in the starling , 1985, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[59]  P. Dallos,et al.  Psychophysical tuning curves of chinchillas. , 1975, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[60]  J J Eggermont,et al.  Compound actionpotential tuning curves in normal and pathological human ears. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[61]  Robert L. Smith,et al.  Forward masking of the compound action potential: Thresholds for the detection of the N1 peak , 1991, Hearing Research.

[62]  E. Lepage The mammalian cochlear map is optimally warped. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.