Robust decision-making design for sustainable pedestrian concrete bridges

Abstract In recent years, there is a trend toward the construction of sustainable structures. The goal of sustainability in structures involves several criteria that are normally opposed, leading to a decision-making process. In this process, there is a subjective portion that cannot be eliminated, such as qualitative criteria assessment of and assigning criteria importance. In these cases, decision-makers become part of the decision-making process, assessing it according to their preferences. In this work, a methodology to reduce the participation of decision-makers in achieving the goal of sustainability in structures is proposed. For this purpose, principal component analysis, kriging-based optimization, and the analytical hierarchy process are used. Principal component analysis is used to reduce the complexity of the problem according to the highly correlated criteria. Kriging-based optimization obtains sustainable solutions depending on all the perspectives of sustainability. Finally, the analytical hierarchy process is applied to reduce the optimized sustainable solutions according to the decision-maker’s views. This methodology is applied a continuous concrete box-girder pedestrian bridge deck to reach sustainable designs. This methodology allows a reduction of the complexity of the decision-making problem and also obtains sustainable robust solutions.

[1]  Víctor Yepes,et al.  Life cycle assessment of cost-optimized buttress earth-retaining walls: A parametric study , 2017 .

[2]  Jui-Sheng Chou,et al.  Bidding strategy to support decision-making by integrating fuzzy AHP and regression-based simulation , 2013 .

[3]  Víctor Yepes,et al.  Hybrid harmony search for sustainable design of post-tensioned concrete box-girder pedestrian bridges , 2015 .

[4]  M. D. McKay,et al.  A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code , 2000 .

[5]  Víctor Yepes,et al.  Multiobjective optimization of post-tensioned concrete box-girder road bridges considering cost, CO2 emissions, and safety , 2016 .

[6]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  Kriging Metamodeling in Simulation: A Review , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  R. W. Saaty,et al.  The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used , 1987 .

[8]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications - A State-of-the-Art Survey , 1981, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[9]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[10]  Ali Görener,et al.  Comparing AHP and ANP: An Application of Strategic Decisions Making in a Manufacturing Company , 2012 .

[11]  H. Kaiser An index of factorial simplicity , 1974 .

[12]  Víctor Yepes,et al.  A Review of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods Applied to the Sustainable Bridge Design , 2016 .

[13]  Raid Karoumi,et al.  Life cycle assessment framework for railway bridges: literature survey and critical issues , 2014 .

[14]  Víctor Yepes,et al.  Multi-objective optimization design of bridge piers with hybrid heuristic algorithms , 2012 .

[15]  Steve Strand,et al.  Discovering statistics using SPSS, 2nd edition , 2006 .

[16]  Alexis Laurent,et al.  Limitations of carbon footprint as indicator of environmental sustainability. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  Ravi Prakash,et al.  Life cycle energy analysis of buildings: An overview , 2010 .

[18]  H. Kaiser The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis , 1960 .

[19]  Tatiana García-Segura,et al.  Accelerated optimization method for low-embodied energy concrete box-girder bridge design , 2019, Engineering Structures.

[20]  V. Yepes,et al.  Life-Cycle Assessment: A Comparison between Two Optimal Post-Tensioned Concrete Box-Girder Road Bridges , 2017 .

[21]  Sherif Yehia,et al.  A decision support system for concrete bridge deck maintenance , 2008, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[22]  L. Simões da Silva,et al.  A probabilistic decision-making approach for the sustainable assessment of infrastructures , 2012, Expert Syst. Appl..

[23]  N. Cressie The origins of kriging , 1990 .

[24]  Chimay J. Anumba,et al.  ANP Experiment for Demolition Plan Evaluation , 2014 .

[25]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Multi-Attribute Decision-Making Methods for Assessment of Quality in Bridges and Road Construction: State-Of-The-Art Surveys , 2008 .

[26]  H. Hotelling Relations Between Two Sets of Variates , 1936 .

[27]  Blazenka Divjak,et al.  COMPARISON BETWEEN AHP AND ANP: CASE STUDY OF STRATEGIC PLANNING OF E-LEARNING IMPLEMENTATION , 2007 .

[28]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Sustainability-informed maintenance optimization of highway bridges considering multi-attribute utility and risk attitude , 2015 .

[29]  Nang-Fei Pan,et al.  FUZZY AHP APPROACH FOR SELECTING THE SUITABLE BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION METHOD , 2008 .

[30]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Prioritizing Constructing Projects of Municipalities Based on AHP and COPRAS-G: A Case Study about Footbridges in Iran , 2012 .

[31]  Asma M. A. Bahurmoz The Analytic Hierarchy Process: A Methodology For Win- Win Management , 2004, Egypt. Comput. Sci. J..

[32]  Joaquín J. Pons,et al.  Life cycle assessment of earth-retaining walls: An environmental comparison , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[33]  Jörg Schlaich,et al.  Concrete box-girder bridges , 1982 .