Strengthening organizational performance through accreditation research-a framework for twelve interrelated studies: the ACCREDIT project study protocol

BackgroundService accreditation is a structured process of recognising and promoting performance and adherence to standards. Typically, accreditation agencies either receive standards from an authorized body or develop new and upgrade existing standards through research and expert views. They then apply standards, criteria and performance indicators, testing their effects, and monitoring compliance with them. The accreditation process has been widely adopted. The international investments in accreditation are considerable. However, reliable evidence of its efficiency or effectiveness in achieving organizational improvements is sparse and the value of accreditation in cost-benefit terms has yet to be demonstrated. Although some evidence suggests that accreditation promotes the improvement and standardization of care, there have been calls to strengthen its research base.In response, the ACCREDIT (A ccreditation C ollaborative for the C onduct of R esearch, E valuation and D esignated I nvestigations through T eamwork) project has been established to evaluate the effectiveness of Australian accreditation in achieving its goals. ACCREDIT is a partnership of key researchers, policymakers and agencies.FindingsWe present the framework for our studies in accreditation. Four specific aims of the ACCREDIT project, which will direct our findings, are to: (i) evaluate current accreditation processes; (ii) analyse the costs and benefits of accreditation; (iii) improve future accreditation via evidence; and (iv) develop and apply new standards of consumer involvement in accreditation. These will be addressed through 12 interrelated studies designed to examine specific issues identified as a high priority. Novel techniques, a mix of qualitative and quantitative methods, and randomized designs relevant for health-care research have been developed. These methods allow us to circumvent the fragmented and incommensurate findings that can be generated in small-scale, project-based studies. The overall approach for our research is a multi-level, multi-study design.DiscussionThe ACCREDIT project will examine the utility, reliability, relevance and cost effectiveness of differing forms of accreditation, focused on general practice, aged care and acute care settings in Australia. Empirically, there are potential research gains to be made by understanding accreditation and extending existing knowledge; theoretically, this design will facilitate a systems view of accreditation of benefit to the partnership, international research communities, and future accreditation designers."Accreditation of health-care organisations is a multimillion dollar industry which shapes care in many countries. Recent reviews of research show little evidence that accreditation increases safety or improves quality. It's time we knew about the cost and value of accreditation and about its future direction." [Professor John Øvretveit, Karolinska Institute, Sweden, 7 October 2009]

[1]  François Champagne,et al.  Does accreditation stimulate change? A study of the impact of the accreditation process on Canadian healthcare organizations , 2010, Implementation science : IS.

[2]  W Chapleau Accreditation of ambulance services: building EMS for the future. , 2000, Emergency medical services.

[3]  J. Braithwaite,et al.  Benefits of participating in accreditation surveying. , 2010, International journal of health care quality assurance.

[4]  Barrie Dale,et al.  Applying the ISO 9000 series to higher education: an assessment model , 1999 .

[5]  John Øvretveit,et al.  Does improving quality save money? A review of evidence of which improvements to quality reduce costs to health service providers , 2009 .

[6]  J. Braithwaite,et al.  Health service accreditation as a predictor of clinical and organisational performance: a blinded, random, stratified study , 2010, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[7]  J. Braithwaite,et al.  Determination of health-care teamwork training competencies: a Delphi study. , 2009, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[8]  Jeffrey Braithwaite,et al.  Health sector accreditation research: a systematic review. , 2008, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[9]  Lawrence G. Jones,et al.  Changes in computer science accreditation , 2002, CACM.

[10]  Jeffrey Braithwaite,et al.  The dynamic interaction of quality and efficiency in the emergency department: Squaring the circle? , 2010, Social science & medicine.

[11]  A. Contandriopoulos,et al.  Accreditation: a tool for organizational change in hospitals? , 2004, International journal of health care quality assurance incorporating Leadership in health services.

[12]  William A. Stimson Better public schools with ISO 9000:2000 , 2003 .

[13]  Steven Casper,et al.  Global Quality Norms within National Production Regimes: ISO 9000 Standards in the French and German Car Industries , 1999 .

[14]  A. Epstein,et al.  National Committee on Quality Assurance Health-Plan Accreditation: Predictors, Correlates of Performance, and Market Impact , 2002, Medical care.

[15]  J. Braithwaite,et al.  Sustainable healthcare accreditation: messages from Europe in 2009. , 2010, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[16]  J. Braithwaite,et al.  Distributed leadership to mobilise capacity for accreditation research. , 2009, Journal of health organization and management.

[17]  J. Braithwaite,et al.  Developing the evidence base for accreditation of healthcare organisations: a call for transparency and innovation , 2009, Quality & Safety in Health Care.

[18]  Tim Knight,et al.  The ISO 9000 Quality Systems Handbook , 2006 .

[19]  J. Braithwaite A REVIEW OF HEALTH SECTOR ACCREDITATION RESEARCH LITERATURE , 2007 .

[20]  O. Groene,et al.  Accreditation and ISO certification: do they explain differences in quality management in European hospitals? , 2010, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[21]  Soumaya Yacout,et al.  Integrating ISO 9000 with HACCP programs in seafood processing industry , 1998 .

[22]  Jeffrey Braithwaite,et al.  A prospective, multi-method, multi-disciplinary, multi-level, collaborative, social-organisational design for researching health sector accreditation [LP0560737] , 2006, BMC Health Services Research.

[23]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  Paul Batalden,et al.  General competencies and accreditation in graduate medical education. , 2002, Health affairs.

[25]  Jeffrey Braithwaite,et al.  Are accreditation surveys reliable? , 2009, International journal of health care quality assurance.

[26]  C. Wagner,et al.  Investigating organizational quality improvement systems, patient empowerment, organizational culture, professional involvement and the quality of care in European hospitals: the 'Deepening our Understanding of Quality Improvement in Europe (DUQuE)' project , 2010, BMC health services research.

[27]  T M Reynolds,et al.  Is clinical pathology accreditation worth it? A survey of CPA-accredited laboratories. , 2000, Clinical performance and quality health care.

[28]  A. Steiner,et al.  Accreditation: what can we learn from the Anglophone model? , 1995, Health policy.

[29]  R. Brent Applied Cost-benefit Analysis , 1996 .

[30]  J. Braithwaite,et al.  Are healthcare accreditation surveys reliable , 2009 .

[31]  Alison Davis-Blake,et al.  When Accreditation Standards Change: Factors Affecting Differential Responsiveness of Public and Private Organizations , 2002 .

[32]  David Hoyle QS-9000 Quality Systems Handbook , 1993 .