Ghost driver: A field study investigating the interaction between pedestrians and driverless vehicles

How will pedestrians and bicyclists interact with autonomous vehicles when there is no human driver? In this paper, we outline a novel method for performing observational field experiments to investigate interactions with driverless cars. We provide a proof-of-concept study (N=67), conducted at a crosswalk and a traffic circle, which applies this method. In the study, participants encountered a vehicle that appeared to have no driver, but which in fact was driven by a human confederate hidden inside. We constructed a car seat costume to conceal the driver, who was specially trained to emulate an autonomous system. Data included video recordings and participant responses to post-interaction questionnaires. Pedestrians who encountered the car reported that they saw no driver, yet they managed interactions smoothly, except when the car misbehaved by moving into the crosswalk just as they were about to cross. This method is the first of its kind, and we believe that it contributes a valuable technique for safely acquiring empirical data and insights about driverless vehicle interactions. These insights can then be used to design vehicle behaviors well in advance of the broad deployment of autonomous technology.

[1]  A Várhelyi,et al.  Drivers' speed behaviour at a zebra crossing: a case study. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  V. Sisiopiku,et al.  PEDESTRIAN BEHAVIORS AT AND PERCEPTIONS TOWARDS VARIOUS PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES: AN EXAMINATION BASED ON OBSERVATION AND SURVEY DATA , 2003 .

[3]  Wendy Ju,et al.  Joint Cognition in Automated Driving: Combining Human and Machine Intelligence to Address Novel Problems , 2015, AAAI Spring Symposia.

[4]  Wendy Ju,et al.  The RRADS platform: a real road autonomous driving simulator , 2015, AutomotiveUI.

[5]  Dan Shapiro,et al.  The limits of ethnography: combining social sciences for CSCW , 1994, CSCW '94.

[6]  John W. Polak,et al.  Autonomous cars: The tension between occupant experience and intersection capacity , 2015 .

[7]  George Yannis,et al.  A critical assessment of pedestrian behaviour models , 2009 .

[8]  Max Bushell,et al.  Pedestrian crash trends and potential countermeasures from around the world. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  Harri Peltola,et al.  Does facing traffic improve pedestrian safety? , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  H. Garfinkel.  Studies in Ethnomethodology , 1968 .

[11]  David R. Millen,et al.  Rapid ethnography: time deepening strategies for HCI field research , 2000, DIS '00.

[12]  D Chisholm,et al.  Distribution of road traffic deaths by road user group: a global comparison , 2009, Injury Prevention.

[13]  Wendy Ju,et al.  The Design of Implicit Interactions , 2015, Synthesis Lectures on Human-Centered Informatics.

[14]  Johannes Weyer,et al.  Human–Machine Cooperation in Smart Cars: An Empirical Investigation of the Loss-of-Control Thesis , 2015 .

[15]  Wendy Ju,et al.  Initiating Interactions and Negotiating Approach: A Robotic Trash Can in the Field , 2015, AAAI Spring Symposia.

[16]  Arne Jönsson,et al.  Wizard of Oz studies: why and how , 1993, IUI '93.

[17]  Austin Henderson,et al.  Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice , 1995 .

[18]  John van der Kamp,et al.  Visual timing and adaptive behavior in a road-crossing simulation study. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  A methodological variation for acceptance evaluation of Human-Robot Interaction in public places , 2008, RO-MAN 2008 - The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[20]  Andy Crabtree,et al.  Design in the absence of practice: breaching experiments , 2004, DIS '04.

[21]  Vicente Milanés Montero,et al.  Autonomous Pedestrian Collision Avoidance Using a Fuzzy Steering Controller , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[22]  S. Axelrod,et al.  Eye contact as an antecedent to compliant behavior. , 1984, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[23]  J. Crandall,et al.  Designing road vehicles for pedestrian protection , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[24]  Ignacio Parra,et al.  An Experimental Study on Pitch Compensation in Pedestrian-Protection Systems for Collision Avoidance and Mitigation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[25]  Stéphane Côté,et al.  Higher social class predicts increased unethical behavior , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  C. Kleinke,et al.  Compliance to requests made by gazing and touching experimenters in field settings. , 1977 .

[27]  I. Walker,et al.  Drivers' gaze fixations during judgements about a bicyclist's intentions , 2007 .

[28]  Nicolas Guéguen,et al.  A pedestrian’s stare and drivers’ stopping behavior: A field experiment at the pedestrian crossing , 2015 .

[29]  Frank Douma,et al.  Self-Driving Vehicles: Current Status of Autonomous Vehicle Development and Minnesota Policy Implications , 2014 .

[30]  Changxu Wu,et al.  Pedestrians' crossing behaviors and safety at unmarked roadway in China. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[31]  Wendy Ju,et al.  Adventures of an Adolescent Trash Barrel , 2015, HRI.

[32]  David SIRKIN,et al.  USING EMBODIED DESIGN IMPROVISATION AS A DESIGN RESEARCH TOOL , 2014 .

[33]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Experimental Research of Pedestrian Walking Behavior , 2003 .