TRUCK TRIP DATA COLLECTION METHODS

A considerable body of research exists for addressing the data needs for passenger transportation models and statewide freight truck movements. The number of studies which focus on methods for capturing the necessary data on urban freight movements is less abundant. This study addresses this problem by identifying those freight data attributes necessary for both urban region truck modeling and freight planning efforts and evaluates alternative data collection methodologies for providing these necessary data attributes. Data attributes such as origin-destination detail, route identification, land-use at stops, commodity, weight, vehicle configuration, time of day, volume of shipments and location of trip generators were identified as necessary for modeling and planning needs. Two pilot studies were conducted in the Portland, Oregon, metropolitan area, to test truck trip data collection methodologies. One pilot study tested a roadside intercept survey method at three different locations, including an interstate highway weigh station, a Port of Portland marine terminal, and a private freight warehouse/distribution center. The other pilot study tested a combination of mail and fax survey methods used with two different sample types. The survey methods tested included straight mail, phone-mail, phone-mail-phone, straight fax, phone-fax, phone-fax-phone, sent to a "Known" and "Unknown" mail population. The results from the different freight data collection methodologies are presented and evaluated.

[1]  Venkatesh Krishnan,et al.  Highway Freight Flow Assignment in Massachusetts Using Geographic Information Systems , 1998 .

[2]  D L Christiansen URBAN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING FOR URBAN GOODS AND SERVICES. A REFERENCE GUIDE , 1979 .

[3]  Lance R Grenzeback,et al.  Assessment of Market Demand for Cross-Harbor Rail Freight Service in the New York Metropolitan Region , 2000 .

[4]  B. Warf,et al.  THE PORT AUTHORITY OF NEW YORK-NEW JERSEY * , 1988 .

[5]  E R Ruiter Development of an urban truck travel model for the Phoenix metropolitan area , 1992 .

[6]  J D Brogan,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF TRUCK TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING TECHNIQUES AND DATA REQUIREMENTS , 1977 .

[7]  S. Baker,et al.  Summary Report , 2006 .

[8]  M L Schlappi,et al.  TRUCK TRAVEL IN THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA , 1993 .

[9]  Mark A. Turnquist,et al.  GOODS MOVEMENT: REGIONAL ANALYSIS AND DATABASE. FINAL REPORT , 1993 .

[10]  R Tardif,et al.  1995 COMMERCIAL VEHICLE SURVEY: FINAL REPORT , 1997 .

[11]  F G Rawling INFORMATION NEEDS FOR POLICY, PLANNING AND DESIGN , 1989 .

[12]  C Michael Walton,et al.  INTERMODAL CONTAINER PORTS: APPLICATION OF AUTOMATIC VEHICLE CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM FOR COLLECTING TRIP GENERATION DATA , 1993 .

[13]  James D Brogan DEVELOPMENT OF TRUCK TRIP-GENERATION RATES BY GENERALIZED LAND-USE CATEGORIES , 1979 .

[14]  M J Fischer,et al.  TRUCK TRIP GENERATION DATA , 2001 .

[15]  J P Reilly,et al.  CATS COMMERCIAL VEHICLE SURVEY OF 1986 : A DISCUSSION OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT ISSUES , 1987 .

[16]  Paul Sorensen,et al.  Skagit Countywide Air, Rail, Water, and Port Transportation System Study , 1997 .

[17]  David A Zavattero,et al.  COMMERCIAL VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION IN CHICAGO REGION , 1981 .

[18]  Robert L. Smith,et al.  Development of a Statewide Truck-Travel Demand Model with Limited Origin-Destination Survey Data , 1997 .

[19]  William R. Gillis Washington State freight truck origin and destination study : methods, procedures, and data dictionary , 1994 .

[20]  Peter L. Watson,et al.  Urban goods movement: A disaggregate approach , 1975 .

[21]  Jeffrey Ang-Olson,et al.  External Urban Truck Trips Based on Commodity Flows: A Model , 2000 .

[22]  R R Tadi,et al.  TRUCK TRIP GENERATION CHARACTERISTICS OF NONRESIDENTIAL LAND USES , 1994 .

[23]  Ken Casavant STRATEGIC FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS (SFTA) , 2001 .

[24]  D. Dillman Mail and telephone surveys : the total design method , 1979 .

[25]  Mark A. Turnquist,et al.  Estimating truck travel patterns in urban areas , 1994 .

[26]  Arun Chatterjee,et al.  Goods Transportation in Urban Areas , 1989 .

[27]  Robert L Smith,et al.  Development of a Statewide Truck Trip Forecasting Model Based on Commodity Flows and Input-Output Coefficients , 2000 .

[28]  James D Brogan,et al.  IMPROVING TRUCK TRIP-GENERATION TECHNIQUES THROUGH TRIP-END STRATIFICATION , 1980 .

[29]  G Wickstrom,et al.  QUICK-RESPONSE URBAN TRAVEL ESTIMATION TECHNIQUES AND TRANSFERABLE PARAMETERS. USER'S GUIDE , 1978 .

[30]  K. Ogden Urban Goods Movement: A Guide to Policy and Planning , 1991 .

[31]  F G Rawling,et al.  THE ROLE OF A COMMERCIAL VEHICLE SURVEY IN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING FOR NORTHEAST ILLINOIS , 1987 .

[32]  Martin E Lipinski,et al.  CHARACTERISTICS OF URBAN FREIGHT SYSTEMS , 1995 .

[33]  Samuel W. Lau,et al.  TRUCK TRAVEL SURVEYS: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE AND STATE-OF-THE-ART , 1995 .

[34]  Julius Gorys 1988 ONTARIO COMMERCIAL VEHICLE SURVEY , 1991 .

[35]  David P Middendorf,et al.  DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF STATEWIDE, MULTIMODAL FREIGHT FORECASTING PROCEDURES FOR FLORIDA , 1982 .

[36]  J D Brogan,et al.  ESTIMATING TRUCK TRAFFIC FOR ANALYZING UGM PROBLEMS AND OPPORTUNITIES , 1979 .

[37]  Mark A. Turnquist,et al.  ANALYSIS OF A DEDICATED COMMERCIAL TRANSPORTATION CORRIDOR IN THE NEW YORK METROPOLITAN AREA , 1995 .

[38]  Frederick W Memmott,et al.  PRACTICAL METHODOLOGY FOR FREIGHT FORECASTING , 1982 .

[39]  F G Rawling,et al.  APPLICATION OF DISCRETE COMMERCIAL VEHICLE DATA TO CATS' PLANNING AND MODELLING PROCEDURES , 1991 .