Effect of wearing cervical headgear on tongue pressure.

The purpose of this study was to examine whether wearing cervical headgear affected tongue pressure on the lingual surface of mandibular incisors, with particular attention to suprahyoid muscle activity. Tongue pressure was recorded using a miniature pressure sensor without cervical headgear and with two cervical headgears with traction forces of 500 and 1200 g, respectively. Electromyographic activity of suprahyoid muscles and respiratory-related movement were recorded simultaneously. Wearing cervical headgear significantly affected tongue pressure and suprahyoid muscle activity in the short-term. A significant increase in tongue pressure was observed in association with an increase in traction force from 500 to 1200 g, whereas no significant difference in suprahyoid muscles activity was seen between these force levels. These results suggest that wearing cervical headgear increases tongue pressure on the lingual surface of mandibular incisors, and this increase in tongue pressure may result from changes in the electromyographic activity of suprahyoid muscles to maintain adequate pharyngeal patency.

[1]  C. Zwillich,et al.  Geniohyoid muscle activity in normal men during wakefulness and sleep. , 1990, Journal of applied physiology.

[2]  K. Türker,et al.  Jaw reflexes evoked by mechanical stimulation of teeth in humans. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  C. Garvan,et al.  Anteroposterior skeletal and dental changes after early Class II treatment with bionators and headgear. , 1998, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[4]  E. vanLunteren,et al.  The muscles of the upper airways. , 1986, Clinics in chest medicine.

[5]  W. Proffit,et al.  Benefit of early Class II treatment: progress report of a two-phase randomized clinical trial. , 1998, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[6]  M. Hans,et al.  Cephalometric evaluation of two treatment strategies for deep overbite correction. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[7]  C. Stohler,et al.  Short and long latency jaw-opening reflex responses elicited by mechanical stimulation in man. , 1985, Archives of oral biology.

[8]  E. E. West,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the orthodontic and orthopedic effects of maxillary traction. , 1983, American journal of orthodontics.

[9]  M. Hans,et al.  Soft tissue growth of the oropharynx. , 2010, The Angle orthodontist.

[10]  C. Zwillich,et al.  Upper airway resistance and geniohyoid muscle activity in normal men during wakefulness and sleep. , 1990, Journal of applied physiology.

[11]  T. Ono,et al.  Effect of changes in the breathing mode and body position on tongue pressure with respiratory-related oscillations. , 1999, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[12]  M. Ozbek,et al.  Oropharyngeal airway dimensions and functional-orthopedic treatment in skeletal Class II cases. , 1998, The Angle orthodontist.

[13]  E. Begole,et al.  Control of the vertical dimension in Class II correction using a cervical headgear and lower utility arch in growing patients. Part I. , 1994, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[14]  W. Proffit,et al.  Influences on the outcome of early treatment for Class II malocclusion. , 1997, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.