Who needs memory? the case for the Markovian organisation

This paper examines the contradiction of organisational memory: that an organisation requires a memory to operate effectively, but that that same memory inhibits and constrains its ability to operate effectively. We briefly review the field of organisational memory and note its close connection with organisational learning.We introduce a conceptual framework pioneered by Schultze and Stabell for examining contradictions in the area of knowledge management. We use this framework to distinguish between the conventional view of organisational memory, which implicitly or explicitly regards knowledge as a commodity, and a constructivist view, from which emerges a picture of the Markovian organisation: an organisation the future behaviour of which is determined not by memories of the past but by its current state, characterised by an organisational consciousness informed by the activities in which it is engaged. While the emphasis of this paper is theoretical, we suggest that adopting this Markovian view of the organisation might be particularly appropriate to practitioners in organisations that are immersed in turbulent environments.

[1]  Donald A. Schön,et al.  Organizational Learning: A Theory Of Action Perspective , 1978 .

[2]  S. Deetz.  Crossroads---Describing Differences in Approaches to Organization Science: Rethinking Burrell and Morgan and Their Legacy , 1996 .

[3]  Joaquín Alegre,et al.  Organizational Learning and Organizational Knowledge , 2005 .

[4]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[5]  Lorne Olfman,et al.  Organizational Memory , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[6]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Organizational Routines Are Stored as Procedural Memory: Evidence from a Laboratory Study , 1994 .

[7]  J. Spender.  Organizational knowledge, learning and memory: three concepts in search of a theory , 1996 .

[8]  Eric W. Stein,et al.  Organization memory: Review of concepts and recommendations for management , 1995 .

[9]  Anne S. Miner,et al.  Organizational Improvisation and Organizational Memory , 1998 .

[10]  S. Gherardi.  Practice-Based Theorizing on Learning and Knowing in Organizations , 2000 .

[11]  Angelo Ditillo,et al.  Intellectual Capital ‐ Navigating in the New Business Landscape , 1998 .

[12]  Luis A. Guerrero,et al.  Understanding organizational memory , 2001, SCCC 2001. 21st International Conference of the Chilean Computer Science Society.

[13]  G. Huber.  Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[14]  Fernando Olivera,et al.  Memory Systems In Organizations: An Empirical Investigation Of Mechanisms For Knowledge Collection, Storage And Access , 2000 .

[15]  J. Brown,et al.  Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing , 1999 .

[16]  Andreas Abecker,et al.  Ontologies for information management: balancing formality, stability, and sharing scope , 2002, Expert Syst. Appl..

[17]  Ulrike Schultze,et al.  Knowing What You Don't Know? Discourses and Contradictions in Knowledge Management Research , 2004 .

[18]  Ralph Stacey,et al.  Complex Responsive Processes in Organizations: Learning and Knowledge Creation , 2001 .

[19]  J. Walsh.  Managerial and Organizational Cognition: Notes from a Trip Down Memory Lane , 1995 .