Mechanisms behind concurrent payments for ecosystem services in a Chinese nature reserve

Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) seek to protect important ecosystems and related ecosystem services while increasing (or maintaining) human wellbeing by paying resource users directly to change their land and resource use behavior. To increase understanding of socio-economic aspects of PES, this study collected data from households to identify variables that may influence Chinese villagers’ decisions to enroll land in a PES program, the Grain-to-Green Program (GTGP), in the context of simultaneous participation in another PES, the Forest Ecological Benefit Compensation Fund (FEBC). Previous studies identified a baseline of relevant variables, which we use as control variables. Secondary to this, we explore how hypothetical post-participation land use options might promote or deter GTGP participation. In addition to supporting previous findings regarding the role of control variables, our results generated through regression analysis suggest a negative relationship between GTGP enrollment and FEBC participation. We find that villagers view retiring land from crops to plant ecological trees through GTGP as undesirable under current compensation scenarios. Through exploring latent mechanisms underlying PES enrollment in concurrent PES programs, this research provides new insight about PES effectiveness, as well as bases for policy extension, with lessons for design and implementation of PES in China and globally.

[1]  Payments for Ecosystem Services Programs: Predicting Landowner Enrollment and Opportunity Cost Using a Beta-Binomial Model , 2009 .

[2]  Dan van der Horst,et al.  Adoption of payments for ecosystem services: An application of the Hagerstrand model , 2011 .

[3]  Shunsuke Managi,et al.  Public preferences for biodiversity conservation and climate-change mitigation: A choice experiment using ecosystem services indicators , 2013 .

[4]  Jinlan Ni,et al.  Micro-Data Evidence on Family Size and Chinese Household Saving Rates , 2017 .

[5]  Qi Zhang,et al.  Feedback effect of crop raiding in payments for ecosystem services , 2018, Ambio.

[6]  Li An,et al.  Negotiation Analysis: An Introduction , 2002 .

[7]  David R. Lee,et al.  Paying for Environmental Services: An Analysis of Participation in Costa Rica’s PSA Program , 2005 .

[8]  W. Hsiao,et al.  Ill health and its potential influence on household consumptions in rural China. , 2006, Health policy.

[9]  S. Wunder.  Payments for environmental services and the poor: concepts and preliminary evidence , 2008, Environment and Development Economics.

[10]  D. McFadden.  Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[11]  Xiaodong Chen,et al.  Linking social norms to efficient conservation investment in payments for ecosystem services , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Jianguo Liu,et al.  Ecological and socioeconomic effects of China's policies for ecosystem services , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  M. Feldman,et al.  Does household composition matter? The impact of the Grain for Green Program on rural livelihoods in China , 2012 .

[14]  K. Lancaster,et al.  Consumer Demand. A New Approach. , 1972 .

[15]  B. Swallow,et al.  Designing a payments for ecosystem services (PES) program to reduce deforestation in Tanzania: : An assessment of payment approaches , 2013 .

[16]  B. Adhikari,et al.  Designing payments for ecosystem services schemes: some considerations , 2013 .

[17]  A. Nordén.  Payment Types and Participation in Payment for Ecosystem Services Programs: Stated Preferences of Landowners , 2014 .

[18]  Qi Zhang,et al.  Rural Household Energy Use and Its Determinants in China: How Important Are Influences of Payment for Ecosystem Services vs. Other Factors? , 2018 .

[19]  R. Yin,et al.  The implementation and impacts of China's largest payment for ecosystem services program as revealed by longitudinal household data , 2014 .

[20]  Xin Liu,et al.  Forest Ecosystem Services and Eco-Compensation Mechanisms in China , 2011, Environmental management.

[21]  Lei Shi,et al.  Mapping Vegetation and Land Use Types in Fanjingshan National Nature Reserve Using Google Earth Engine , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[22]  E. Milner‐Gulland,et al.  Impact of payments for environmental services and protected areas on local livelihoods and forest conservation in northern Cambodia , 2014, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[23]  R. Deal,et al.  Bundling of ecosystem services to increase forestland value and enhance sustainable forest management , 2012 .

[24]  Dennis Anderson,et al.  Rural Nonfarm Employment in Developing Countries , 1980, Economic Development and Cultural Change.

[25]  Stefanie Engel,et al.  The Devil in the Detail: A Practical Guide on Designing Payments for Environmental Services , 2016 .

[26]  Murray A. Rudd,et al.  Evaluating the outcomes of payments for ecosystem services programmes using a capital asset framework , 2014 .

[27]  Christopher B. Barrett,et al.  Nonfarm Income Diversification and Household Livelihood Strategies in Rural Africa: Concepts, Dynamics and Policy Implications , 2001 .

[28]  Qi Zhang,et al.  Effects of China’s payment for ecosystem services programs on cropland abandonment: A case study in Tiantangzhai Township, Anhui, China , 2018 .

[29]  Liu Dachang,et al.  Tenure and Management of Non-State Forests in China since 1950: A Historical Review , 2001, Environmental History.

[30]  R. Shibata,et al.  PARTIAL CORRELATION AND CONDITIONAL CORRELATION AS MEASURES OF CONDITIONAL INDEPENDENCE , 2004 .

[31]  Li An,et al.  Perception and decisions in modeling coupled human and natural systems: A case study from Fanjingshan National Nature Reserve, China , 2012 .

[32]  C. Donlan,et al.  Scaling participation in payments for ecosystem services programs , 2018, PloS one.

[33]  J. Diamond,et al.  China's environment in a globalizing world , 2005, Nature.

[34]  P. Ferraro,et al.  Do Payments Pay Off? Evidence from Participation in Costa Rica’s PES Program , 2015, PloS one.

[35]  Huiyuan Zhang,et al.  Payment for Ecosystem Services in China: An Overview , 2011 .

[36]  Richard Coe,et al.  A conjoint analysis of farmer preferences for community forestry contracts in the Sumber Jaya Watershed, Indonesia , 2009 .

[37]  E. Corbera,et al.  The Effectiveness of Payments for Environmental Services , 2017 .

[38]  S. Wunder,et al.  Opportunity Costs as a Determinant of Participation in Payments for Ecosystem Service Schemes , 2011 .

[39]  Li An,et al.  Agent-based modeling of the effects of social norms on enrollment in payments for ecosystem services. , 2012, Ecological modelling.

[40]  G. He,et al.  Rural Households’ Attitude and Economic Strategies Toward the Conversion of Cropland to Forest and Grassland Program (CCFG): A Case Study in Qira, China , 2009, Environmental management.

[41]  M. Qaim,et al.  Toward Improving the Design of Sustainability Standards—A Gendered Analysis of Farmers’ Preferences , 2017 .

[42]  Q. Zhang,et al.  Analyzing Farmers’ Perceptions of Ecosystem Services and PES Schemes within Agricultural Landscapes in Mengyin County, China: Transforming Trade-Offs into Synergies , 2017 .

[43]  Qi Zhang,et al.  Determinants of out-migration in rural China: effects of payments for ecosystem services , 2018, Population and environment.

[44]  Ashton M. Shortridge,et al.  Effects of payments for ecosystem services on wildlife habitat recovery , 2016, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[45]  D. López‐Carr,et al.  What factors influence participation in payment for ecosystem services programs? An evaluation of Ecuador's SocioPáramo program , 2014 .

[46]  Arbi J. Sarkissian,et al.  Asset-building payments for ecosystem services: assessing landowner perceptions of reforestation incentives in Lebanon , 2017 .

[47]  S. Rozelle,et al.  Grain for Green: Cost-Effectiveness and Sustainability of China’s Conservation Set-Aside Program , 2005, Land Economics.

[48]  S. Rozelle,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness of Payments for Ecosystem Services with Dual Goals of Environment and Poverty Alleviation , 2010, Environmental management.

[49]  M. Honzák,et al.  Targeting and implementing payments for ecosystem services: Opportunities for bundling biodiversity conservation with carbon and water services in Madagascar , 2010 .

[50]  Jon C. Lovett,et al.  Payments for ecosystem services and rural development: Landowners' preferences and potential participation in western Mexico , 2013 .

[51]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[52]  Arun Agrawal,et al.  Understanding the Social and Ecological Outcomes of PES Projects: A Review and an Analysis , 2013 .

[53]  Mark Rickenbach,et al.  Attitudes and preferences toward co-operative agreements for management of private forestlands in the North-eastern United States , 1999 .

[54]  G. Shao,et al.  China's Forest Policy for the 21st Century , 2000, Science.

[55]  S. Rozelle,et al.  Conservation Payments, Liquidity Constraints, and Off‐Farm Labor: Impact of the Grain‐For‐Green Program on Rural Households in China , 2008 .

[56]  S. Wunder.  Payments for environmental services : Some nuts and bolts , 2022 .

[57]  T. Dufhues,et al.  Reconciling Global and Local Benefits from Communally Managed Forests: Evidence from a Choice Experiment on PES in Zambia , 2016 .