The influence of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on individuals' knowledge sharing behavior

A major challenge in knowledge management involves motivating people to share knowledge with others. The objective of this study is to deepen our understanding of how to influence an individual's tendency to engage in knowledge sharing behavior in a team setting. Specifically, we investigate the effects of intrinsic motivation (altruism) and extrinsic motivation (economic reward, reputation feedback and reciprocity) on knowledge sharing (number of ideas generated, idea usefulness, idea creativity and meeting satisfaction) in a group meeting. Results of our experiment show that a knowledge management system with built-in reputation feedback is crucial to support successful knowledge sharing.

[1]  George K. Easton,et al.  An experimental investigation of electronic focus groups , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[2]  Myra Spiliopoulou,et al.  The Influence of Incentives and Culture on Knowledge Sharing , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[3]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks , 1998 .

[4]  Stephen J. H. Yang,et al.  A social network-based system for supporting interactive collaboration in knowledge sharing over peer-to-peer network , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[5]  Alexander Styhre,et al.  Knowledge Sharing in Organizations , 2003 .

[6]  Eileen Z. Taylor,et al.  The Effect of Incentives on Knowledge Sharing in Computer-Mediated Communication: An Experimental Investigation , 2006, J. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  A Multilevel Investigation of the Motivational Mechanisms Underlying Knowledge Sharing and Performance , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[8]  P. Kollock.  The Economies of Online Cooperation: Gifts and Public Goods in Cyberspace , 1999 .

[9]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[10]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Motivation and Creativity: Effects of Motivational Orientation on Creative Writers , 1985 .

[11]  K. D. Joshi,et al.  Knowledge transfer within information systems development teams: Examining the role of knowledge source attributes , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[12]  Hazel Hall,et al.  Input-friendliness: motivating knowledge sharing across intranets , 2001, J. Inf. Sci..

[13]  Yu-Chen Chen,et al.  Extrinsic versus intrinsic motivations for consumers to shop on-line , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[14]  B. Frey,et al.  Motivation, Knowledge Transfer, and Organizational Forms , 2000 .

[15]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Enabling Knowledge Creation: How to Unlock the Mystery of Tacit Knowledge and Release the Power of Innovation , 2000 .

[16]  Linda D. Molm.  Coercive power in social exchange , 1997 .

[17]  B. Gray,et al.  Toward a Comprehensive Theory of Collaboration , 1991 .

[18]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[19]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  An Examination of the Impact of Stimuli Type and GSS Structure on Creativity: Brainstorming Versus Non-Brainstorming Techniques in a GSS Environment , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[20]  J. Tirole,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation , 2003 .

[21]  E. Fehr,et al.  Fairness and Retaliation: The Economics of Reciprocity , 2000, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[22]  Wing Tung Au,et al.  Sequential Choice in a Step-Level Public Goods Dilemma: The Effects of Criticality and Uncertainty , 1996 .

[23]  Petter Gottschalk,et al.  Factors Affecting Knowledge Transfer in IT Projects , 2004 .

[24]  Nelson F. Granados,et al.  Managing Organizational Knowledge , 2010 .

[25]  Mark F. Schultz.  Fear and Norms and Rock & Roll: What Jambands Can Teach Us about Persuading People to Obey Copyright Law , 2005 .

[26]  Young-Gul Kim,et al.  Breaking the Myths of Rewards: An Exploratory Study of Attitudes about Knowledge Sharing , 2002, Inf. Resour. Manag. J..

[27]  Minyi Huang,et al.  Does IT Payoff? Strategies of Two Banking Giants , 2009, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[28]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Toward A Theory of Knowledge Reuse : Types of Knowledge Reuse Situations and Factors in Reuse Success , 2022 .

[29]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[30]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[31]  Brian K. Thorn,et al.  Discretionary Databases: Theory, Data, and Implications , 1990 .

[32]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Are norms enough? The role of collaborative norms in promoting organizational knowledge seeking , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[33]  Donald R. Cooper,et al.  Business Research Methods , 1980 .

[34]  Kent Marett,et al.  The Decision to Share Information and Rumors: Examining the Role of Motivation in an Online Discussion Forum , 2009, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Dan Holtshouse.  Knowledge Research Issues , 1998 .

[36]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital and Knowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice , 2005, MIS Q..

[37]  Daniel Stewart.  Social Status in an Open-Source Community , 2005 .

[38]  Janet Fulk,et al.  Organizations and Communication Technology , 1990 .

[39]  Judith Donath,et al.  Identity and deception in the virtual community , 1998 .

[40]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Factors, and Organizational Climate , 2005, MIS Q..

[41]  J. McGrath.  Groups: Interaction and Performance , 1984 .

[42]  S. Kiesler,et al.  The kindness of strangers: on the usefulness of electronic weak ties for technical advice , 1996 .

[43]  Kwok Kee Wei,et al.  What drives continued knowledge sharing? An investigation of knowledge-contribution and -seeking beliefs , 2009, Decis. Support Syst..

[44]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Research Commentary: Introducing a Third Dimension in Information Systems Design - The Case for Incentive Alignment , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[45]  Kiku Jones,et al.  Knowledge Management as a Foundation for Decision Support Systems , 2006, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[46]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace1 , 1992 .

[47]  B. Bernheim,et al.  A Theory of Conformity , 1994, Journal of Political Economy.

[48]  A. Todorov,et al.  The illusion of knowledge: When more information reduces accuracy and increases confidence , 2007 .

[49]  Carla O'Dell,et al.  If Only We Knew What We Know: Identification and Transfer of Internal Best Practices , 1998 .

[50]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[51]  M. McLure Wasko,et al.  "It is what one does": why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[52]  H. D. Thomas,et al.  SUCCESSFUL KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT PROJECTS , 1998 .

[53]  S. Green,et al.  The effects of three social decision schemes on decision group process , 1980 .

[54]  P. Kollock,et al.  Communities in Cyberspace , 2002 .

[55]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[56]  Earl R. Babbie,et al.  The practice of social research , 1969 .

[57]  Lee Sproull,et al.  What's Mine Is Ours, or Is It? A Study of Attitudes about Information Sharing , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[58]  Blair H. Sheppard,et al.  The Theory of Reasoned Action: A Meta-Analysis of Past Research with Recommendations for Modifications and Future Research , 1988 .

[59]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  The Effect of Social Context on the Success of Knowledge Repository Systems , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[60]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[61]  S. Borgatti,et al.  A General Theory of Network Governance: Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms , 1997 .

[62]  P. Slater.  Contrasting Correlates of Group Size , 1958 .

[63]  Barry M. Staw,et al.  Self-perception of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. , 1975, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[64]  Silke Anger,et al.  The Returns to Cognitive Abilities and Personality Traits in Germany , 2008 .

[65]  N. Nohria,et al.  Cracking the code of change. , 2000, Harvard business review.

[66]  Michael Parent,et al.  Knowledge creation in focus groups: can group technologies help? , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[67]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  The Knowledge Management Toolkit: Orchestrating IT, Strategy, and Knowledge Platforms , 2002 .

[68]  E. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[69]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An Empirical Investigation , 2005, MIS Q..

[70]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Creation of Favorable User Perceptions: Exploring the Role of Intrinsic Motivation , 1999, MIS Q..

[71]  A. Gouldner.  THE NORM OF RECIPROCITY: A PRELIMINARY STATEMENT * , 1960 .

[72]  C. Anumba,et al.  Knowledge Management in UK Construction: Strategies, Resources and Barriers , 2004 .

[73]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[74]  Matthew K. O. Lee,et al.  Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: the role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[75]  H. Kelley,et al.  Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence , 1978 .

[76]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  The Empirical Exploration of Intrinsic Motivational Processes1 , 1980 .

[77]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[78]  K. M. Bartol,et al.  Encouraging Knowledge Sharing: The Role of Organizational Reward Systems , 2002 .

[79]  R. Vallerand.  Toward A Hierarchical Model of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation , 1997 .