Wind feed-forward control of a USV

Since Unmanned Surface Vehicles (USVs) are relatively light weight and have a large windage area, they are sensitive to wind disturbances, especially during station-keeping operations. While robust feedback controllers can be used to attenuate slowly changing wind disturbances, they have difficulty compensating for the rapid variation of wind speed and direction. Control and sensing strategies were developed to mitigate wind effects on a 4.9 meter long, 180 kg USV. A wind feed-forward controller was designed using an anemometer to measure the apparent wind speed/direction and a wind model to estimate the wind-induced forces and moments on the USV in real-time. Freely drifting tests were performed to evaluate the impact of the wind on an unpowered USV. The vehicle was blown more than 20 meters off station in 5 minutes in mean wind speeds of about 2m/s. Experiments also showed that the response time of the USV to wind gusts is about 5 seconds. The wind feedforward feature was added to different station-keeping feedback controllers, namely a PD controller, a robust backstepping controller, and a sliding mode controller. Station keeping tests of those controllers without/ with wind feedforward controller were conducted and repeated for 5 times. The experimental results showed that the small size of USV can gain significant benefits from the inclusion of wind feedforward feature in both position and heading by an average of 75%, and 46% respectively in 5 sets of station keeping experiments.

[1]  Wilhelm B. Klinger Adaptive Controller Design for an Autonomous Twin-Hulled Surface Vessel with Uncertain Displacement and Drag , 2014 .

[2]  F. Kitamura,et al.  Estimation of wind force acting on huge floating ocean structures , 1997, Oceans '97. MTS/IEEE Conference Proceedings.

[3]  Edoardo I. Sarda,et al.  Development of a USV station-keeping controller , 2015, OCEANS 2015 - Genova.

[4]  J.E. Manley,et al.  Unmanned surface vehicles, 15 years of development , 2008, OCEANS 2008.

[5]  Song Jian,et al.  Modeling and simulation of marine environmental disturbances for dynamic positioned ship , 2012, Proceedings of the 31st Chinese Control Conference.

[6]  R W Gould THE ESTIMATION OF WIND LOADS ON SHIP SUPERSTRUCTURES , 1982 .

[7]  Karl D. von Ellenrieder,et al.  Controller design challenges for waterjet propelled unmanned surface vehicles with uncertain drag and mass properties , 2013, 2013 OCEANS - San Diego.

[8]  T.A. Johansen,et al.  A Survey of Control Allocation Methods for Ships and Underwater Vehicles , 2006, 2006 14th Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation.

[9]  Kostas J. Kyriakopoulos,et al.  Dynamic positioning for an underactuated marine vehicle using hybrid control , 2014, Int. J. Control.

[10]  Khac Duc Do,et al.  Practical control of underactuated ships , 2010 .

[11]  Thor I. Fossen,et al.  Tutorial on nonlinear backstepping: Applications to ship control , 1999 .

[12]  R. M. Isherwood WIND RESISTANCE OF MERCHANT SHIPS , 1972 .

[13]  O. J. Sordalen,et al.  Optimal thrust allocation for marine vessels , 1997 .

[14]  Farshad Mahini,et al.  Autonomous Surface Vessel Target Tracking Experiments in Simulated Rough Sea Conditions , 2012 .

[15]  Po-Wen Cheng,et al.  Comparison of feedforward and model predictive control of wind turbines using LIDAR , 2012, 2012 IEEE 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[16]  Karl D. von Ellenrieder,et al.  Characterization and System Identification of an Unmanned Amphibious Tracked Vehicle , 2014, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[17]  R. Stephens Wind feedforward: blowing away the myths , 2011 .

[18]  Thor I. Fossen,et al.  Guidance and control of ocean vehicles , 1994 .

[19]  T.I. Fossen,et al.  On integral control in backstepping: analysis of different techniques , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 American Control Conference.

[20]  Karl D. von Ellenrieder,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of Approach Behavior for Autonomous Surface Vehicles , 2013 .