Measuring the convergence behavior of shell analysis schemes

While shells have been analyzed abundantly for many years in engineering and the sciences, improved finite element and related analysis methods are still much desired and researched. More general and effective finite element procedures are needed for complex shell structures, including for the analysis of composite shells and the optimization of shells. In this paper we discuss how finite element methods, and other analysis techniques, should be tested in order to identify their reliability and effectiveness. We summarize some important theoretical results, present appropriate test problems and convergence measures, and we illustrate our discussion through some novel numerical results. An important conclusion is that the testing has to be performed very carefully in order to obtain relevant results, and we show how this is accomplished in detail.

[1]  K. Bathe.  Finite Element Procedures , 1995 .

[2]  Klaus-Jürgen Bathe,et al.  A triangular six-node shell element , 2009 .

[3]  Dominique Chapelle,et al.  Detailed reliability assessment of triangular MITC elements for thin shells , 2008 .

[4]  Anthony Ralston,et al.  Encyclopedia of computer science and engineering , 1983 .

[5]  Dominique Chapelle,et al.  On the ellipticity condition for model-parameter dependent mixed formulations , 2010 .

[6]  D. Chapelle,et al.  The Finite Element Analysis of Shells - Fundamentals , 2003 .

[7]  Klaus-Jürgen Bathe,et al.  A 4-node 3D-shell element to model shell surface tractions and incompressible behavior , 2008 .

[8]  Klaus-Jürgen Bathe,et al.  On evaluating the inf–sup condition for plate bending elements , 1997 .

[9]  Dominique Chapelle,et al.  3D-SHELL ELEMENTS AND THEIR UNDERLYING MATHEMATICAL MODEL , 2004 .

[10]  Phill-Seung Lee,et al.  Insight into finite element shell discretizations by use of the basic shell mathematical model , 2005 .

[11]  Long Chen.  FINITE ELEMENT METHOD , 2013 .

[12]  Dominique Chapelle,et al.  Towards improving the MITC6 triangular shell element , 2007 .

[13]  Phill-Seung Lee,et al.  Insight into 3-node triangular shell finite elements: the effects of element isotropy and mesh patterns , 2007 .

[14]  K. Bathe,et al.  The MITC7 and MITC9 Plate bending elements , 1989 .

[15]  Phill-Seung Lee,et al.  On the asymptotic behavior of shell structures and the evaluation in finite element solutions , 2002 .

[16]  Dominique Chapelle,et al.  The mathematical shell model underlying general shell elements , 2000 .

[17]  K. Bathe,et al.  Fundamental considerations for the finite element analysis of shell structures , 1998 .

[18]  J. Z. Zhu,et al.  The finite element method , 1977 .

[19]  Alexander G Iosilevich,et al.  An inf-sup test for shell finite elements , 2000 .

[20]  Klaus-Jürgen Bathe,et al.  The inf–sup condition and its evaluation for mixed finite element methods , 2001 .

[21]  K. Bathe,et al.  Review: A posteriori error estimation techniques in practical finite element analysis , 2005 .

[22]  Thomas Grätsch,et al.  Review: A posteriori error estimation techniques in practical finite element analysis , 2005 .

[23]  R. L. Harder,et al.  A proposed standard set of problems to test finite element accuracy , 1985 .

[24]  K. Bathe,et al.  Development of MITC isotropic triangular shell finite elements , 2004 .

[25]  Phill-Seung Lee,et al.  The quadratic MITC plate and MITC shell elements in plate bending , 2010, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[26]  K. Bathe,et al.  A continuum mechanics based four‐node shell element for general non‐linear analysis , 1984 .

[27]  Phill-Seung Lee,et al.  Towards improving the MITC9 shell element , 2003 .

[28]  K. Bathe,et al.  Measuring convergence of mixed finite element discretizations: an application to shell structures , 2003 .

[29]  Jean E. Roberts,et al.  Mixed and hybrid finite element methods , 1987 .

[30]  S. BRODETSKY,et al.  Theory of Plates and Shells , 1941, Nature.