How to Support Forest Management in a World of Change: Results of Some Regional Studies

This article presents results of several studies in Middle, Eastern and Southeastern Europe on needs and application areas, desirable attributes and marketing potentials of forest management support tools. By comparing present and future application areas, a trend from sectoral planning towards landscape planning and integration of multiple stakeholder needs is emerging. In terms of conflicts, where management support tools might provide benefit, no clear tendencies were found, neither on local nor on regional level. In contrast, on national and European levels, support of the implementation of laws, directives, and regulations was found to be of highest importance. Following the user-requirements analysis, electronic tools supporting communication are preferred against paper-based instruments. The users identified most important attributes of optimized management support tools: (i) a broad accessibility for all users at any time should be guaranteed, (ii) the possibility to integrate iteratively experiences from case studies and from regional experts into the knowledge base (learning system) should be given, and (iii) a self-explanatory user interface is demanded, which is also suitable for users rather inexperienced with electronic tools. However, a market potential analysis revealed that the willingness to pay for management tools is very limited, although the participants specified realistic ranges of maximal amounts of money, which would be invested if the products were suitable and payment inevitable. To bridge the discrepancy between unwillingness to pay and the need to use management support tools, optimized financing or cooperation models between practice and science must be found.

[1]  H. Meekes,et al.  Trends in European cultural landscape development: perspectives for a sustainable future , 1999 .

[2]  H. van Keulen,et al.  Can computer models stimulate learning about sustainable land use? Experience with LUPAS in the humid (sub-)tropics of Asia , 2007 .

[3]  E. Johann Traditional forest management under the influence of science and industry: The story of the alpine cultural landscapes , 2007 .

[4]  R. Cooke Experts in Uncertainty: Opinion and Subjective Probability in Science , 1991 .

[5]  L. Mattsson,et al.  Forest ecosystem research — priorities for Europe , 2000 .

[6]  Jean-Christophe Castella,et al.  Impact of forestland allocation on land use in a mountainous province of Vietnam , 2006 .

[7]  E. Z. Başkent,et al.  Developing and implementing participatory and ecosystem based multiple use forest management planning approach (ETÇAP): Yalnızçam case study ☆ , 2008 .

[8]  M. Schütz,et al.  Dominance reduction of species through disturbance—a proposed management principle for central European forests , 2002 .

[9]  Heinrich Spiecker,et al.  Silvicultural management in maintaining biodiversity and resistance of forests in Europe-temperate zone. , 2003, Journal of environmental management.

[10]  Martin Volk,et al.  "Pimp your landscape" - an interactive land-use planning support tool , 2008 .

[11]  Meredith D. Gall,et al.  Educational Research: An Introduction , 1965 .

[12]  Dominik Röser,et al.  Sustainable utilisation of forest biomass for energy - possibilities and problems: policy, legislation, certification, and recommendations and guidelines in the Nordic, Baltic, and other European countries. , 2007 .

[13]  Erwin Führer,et al.  Forest functions, ecosystem stability and management , 2000 .

[14]  K. Bisang,et al.  Rethinking recent changes of forest regimes in Europe through property-rights theory and policy analysis , 2001 .

[15]  J. Parviainen,et al.  Protected forests in Europe approaches-harmonising the definitions for international comparison and forest policy making. , 2003, Journal of environmental management.

[16]  C. Montiel,et al.  Forest policy and land planning policy in Spain: a regional approach , 2005 .

[17]  Magnus Johannesson,et al.  Hypothetical versus real willingness to pay in the health care sector: results from a field experiment. , 2001 .

[18]  Enrique Alonso,et al.  Environmental economic, political and ethical integration in a common decision-making framework. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[19]  G. Manners Regional policies and the national interest , 1981 .

[20]  Sustainable forest management, pecuniary externalities and invisible stakeholders , 2007 .

[21]  G. Buttoud Multipurpose management of mountain forests: which approaches? , 2002 .

[22]  T. Buzan,et al.  The Mind Map Book , 1993 .

[23]  Laura Maxim,et al.  Uncertainty: cause or effect of stakeholders' debates? Analysis of a case study: the risk for honeybees of the insecticide Gaucho. , 2007, The Science of the total environment.

[24]  Harald Vacik,et al.  Meeting the challenges of process-oriented forest management , 2007 .

[25]  Carlo Giupponi,et al.  Environmental decision support systems: Current issues, methods and tools , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[26]  R. Hüttl,et al.  European forest ecosystems: building the future on the legacy of the past , 2000 .

[27]  Dal Didia Democracy, political instability and tropical deforestation , 1997 .

[28]  Mark M. Miller Enhancing Regional Analysis With The Delphi Method , 1993 .

[29]  Ron Janssen,et al.  Why are spatial decision support systems not used? Some experiences from the Netherlands , 2003, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[30]  G. Weiss The political practice of mountain forest restoration—comparing restoration concepts in four European countries , 2004 .

[31]  Murray Turoff,et al.  The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications , 1976 .

[32]  Keith M. Reynolds,et al.  Editorial: Decision-support systems for forest management , 2005 .

[33]  N. Dalkey,et al.  An Experimental Application of the Delphi Method to the Use of Experts , 1963 .

[34]  Fumikazu Ubukata,et al.  Forest sustainability and the free trade of forest products: cases from Southeast Asia , 2004 .

[35]  H. Vacik,et al.  Evaluating sustainable forest management strategies with the Analytic Network Process in a Pressure-State-Response framework. , 2008, Journal of environmental management.

[37]  J. Levy,et al.  Estimating willingness to pay for a hypothetical earthquake early warning systems , 2007 .

[38]  Carol V. Brown,et al.  Differences in end-user computing support and control across user departments , 1997, Inf. Manag..

[39]  H. Vacik,et al.  How Socio-Economic Conditions Influence Forest Policy Development in Central and South-East Europe , 2010, Environmental management.

[40]  L. Firbank,et al.  Identifying and managing the conflicts between agriculture and biodiversity conservation in Europe - a review , 2008 .