Linking Context to Evaluation in the Design of Safety Critical Interfaces
暂无分享,去创建一个
Lance Sherry | Richard L. Lewis | Andrew Howes | Satinder P. Singh | Dorrit Billman | Michael Feary | Xiuli Chen | Satinder Singh | D. Billman | L. Sherry | Andrew Howes | M. Feary | Xiuli Chen
[1] V. Paquet,et al. A Practitioner’s Guide , 2018 .
[2] Robin Jeffries,et al. Applying cognitive walkthroughs to more complex user interfaces: experiences, issues, and recommendations , 1992, CHI.
[3] H Hoagland,et al. The right stuff. , 2000, Occupational health & safety.
[4] David A. Caulton. Relaxing the homogeneity assumption in usability testing , 2001, Behav. Inf. Technol..
[5] L. Faulkner. Beyond the five-user assumption: Benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing , 2003, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[6] Erik D. Reichle,et al. The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models , 2003, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[7] Vasilis Z. Marmarelis,et al. A Practitioner's Guide , 2004 .
[8] Reinhold Kliegl,et al. SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. , 2005, Psychological review.
[9] Richard L. Lewis,et al. Generating automated predictions of behavior strategically adapted to specific performance objectives , 2006, CHI.
[10] Mary M Hayhoe,et al. Task and context determine where you look. , 2016, Journal of vision.
[11] R. Ratcliff,et al. A Diffusion Model Account of Criterion Shifts in the Lexical Decision Task. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.
[12] Richard L. Lewis,et al. Rational adaptation under task and processing constraints: implications for testing theories of cognition and action. , 2009, Psychological review.
[13] Ritch Macefield,et al. How to specify the participant group size for usability studies: a practitioner's guide , 2009 .
[14] D. Ballard,et al. Modelling the role of task in the control of gaze , 2009, Visual cognition.
[15] A. Pinheiro,et al. Rent-a-Car , 2009 .
[16] Dennis Norris,et al. Putting it all together: a unified account of word recognition and reaction-time distributions. , 2009, Psychological review.
[17] Lance Sherry,et al. Needs analysis: the case of flexible constraints and mutable boundaries , 2010, CHI EA '10.
[18] Brian Traynor,et al. Rent a Car in Just 0, 60, 240 or 1,217 Seconds? - Comparative Usability Measurement, CUE-8 , 2010 .
[19] Anne Pier Salverda,et al. A goal-based perspective on eye movements in visual world studies. , 2011, Acta psychologica.
[20] Jessica Lee,et al. Benefits of matching domain structure for planning software: the right stuff , 2011, CHI.
[21] Andrew Howes,et al. Adaptive Interaction: A Utility Maximization Approach to Understanding Human Interaction with Technology , 2013, Adaptive Interaction: A Utility Maximization Approach to Understanding Human Interaction with Technology.
[22] Richard L. Lewis,et al. The Adaptive Nature of Eye Movements in Linguistic Tasks: How Payoff and Architecture Shape Speed-Accuracy Trade-Offs , 2013, Top. Cogn. Sci..