Evidence-based practice in search interface design

An evidence-based practice approach to search interface design is proposed, with the goal of designing interfaces that adequately support search strategy formulation and reformulation. Relevant findings from studies of information professionals' searching behaviors, end users' searching of bibliographic databases, and search behaviors on the Web are highlighted. Three brief examples are presented to illustrate the ways in which findings from such studies can be used to make decisions about the design of search interfaces. If academic research can be effectively connected with design practice, we can discover which design practices truly are “best practices” and incorporate them into future search interfaces. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Prudence W. Dalrymple.  Retrieval by reformulation in two library catalogs: Toward a cognitive model of searching behavior , 1990 .

[2]  Paul B. Kantor,et al.  A Study of Information Seeking and Retrieving. III. Searchers, Searches, and Overlap* , 1988 .

[3]  Ingrid Hsieh-Yee,et al.  Effects of Search Experience and Subject Knowledge on the Search Tactics of Novice and Experienced Searchers. , 1993 .

[4]  Raya Fidel,et al.  Moves in online searching , 1985 .

[5]  Bryce Allen.  Logical Reasoning and Retrieval Performance. , 1993 .

[6]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Direct manipulation vs. interface agents , 1997, INTR.

[7]  Nancy C. M. Ross,et al.  End user searching on the Internet: An analysis of term pair topics submitted to the Excite search engine , 2000, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[8]  Bryce Allen,et al.  Topic Knowledge and Online Catalog Search Formulation , 1991, The Library Quarterly.

[9]  Bernard J. Jansen,et al.  A review of web searching studies and a framework for future research , 2001 .

[10]  D J Shaw,et al.  User interactions with the PDQ cancer information system. , 1992, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.

[11]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  A case for interaction: a study of interactive information retrieval behavior and effectiveness , 1996, CHI.

[12]  Charles P. Friedman,et al.  Search moves made by novice end users (1) , 1992 .

[13]  William R. Hersh,et al.  A task-oriented approach to information retrieval evaluation , 1996 .

[14]  B. Wildemuth.  Post-Positivist Research: Two Examples of Methodological Pluralism , 1993, The Library Quarterly.

[15]  P. Solomon.  Children's information retrieval behavior: A case analysis of an OPAC , 1993 .

[16]  Dania Bilal,et al.  Factors Influencing Children's and Adults' Information Seeking on the Web: Results of Two Studies. , 2001 .

[17]  B M Wildemuth,et al.  End-user search behaviors and their relationship to search effectiveness. , 1995, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.

[18]  Raya Fidel.  Searchers' selection of search keys: I. The selection routine , 1991 .

[19]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Sorting out searching: a user-interface framework for text searches , 1998, CACM.

[20]  Shui-Lung Chuang,et al.  Subject categorization of query terms for exploring Web users' search interests , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[21]  Susan Siegfried,et al.  An Analysis of Search Terminology Used by Humanities Scholars: The Getty Online Searching Project Report Number 1 , 1993, The Library Quarterly.

[22]  Carol Tenopir,et al.  Users' interaction with World Wide Web resources: an exploratory study using a holistic approach , 2000, Inf. Process. Manag..

[23]  Richard A. Sit.  Online library catalog search performance by older adult users , 1998 .

[24]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Visual Information Seeking: A Study of Image Queries on the World Wide Web , 1999 .

[25]  E. Frisse Mark,et al.  Searching for information in a hypertext medical handbook , 1988 .

[26]  Betty K. Oldroyd,et al.  Study of strategies used in on‐line searching , 1977 .

[27]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Dynamics of Search Term Selection during Mediated Online Searching. , 1993 .

[28]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Query length in interactive information retrieval , 2003, SIGIR.

[29]  Jenny K. Holder,et al.  A visit to the information mall: Web searching behavior of high school students , 1999 .

[30]  Gary Marchionini.  Information Seeking in Full-Text End-User-Oriented Search Systems: The Roles of Domain and Search Expertise , 1993 .

[31]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  A profile of end‐user searching behavior by humanities scholars: The Getty Online Searching Project Report No. 2 , 1993 .

[32]  Suresh K. Bhavnani,et al.  Domain-specific search strategies for the effective retrieval of healthcare and shopping information , 2002, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[33]  Deborah Shaw,et al.  Bibliographic Database Searching by Graduate Students in Language and Literature: Search Strategies, System Interfaces, and Relevance Judgments. , 1995 .

[34]  David Nicholas,et al.  An Assessment of the Online Searching behaviour of Practitioner End Users , 1996, J. Documentation.

[35]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Real life, real users, and real needs: a study and analysis of user queries on the web , 2000, Inf. Process. Manag..

[36]  Dania Bilal.  Children's use of the Yahooligans! Web search engine: I. Cognitive, physical, and affective behaviors on fact‐based search tasks , 2000 .

[37]  Charles P. Friedman,et al.  Medical students' personal knowledge, searching proficiency, and database use in problem solving , 1995 .

[38]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  Information search tactics , 1979, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[39]  Alexandra Dimitroff,et al.  Mental Models Theory and Search Outcome in a Bibliographic Retrieval System. , 1992 .

[40]  Christine L. Borgman.  The User's Mental Model of an Information Retrieval System: An Experiment on a Prototype Online Catalog , 1986, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[41]  Barbara M. Wildemuth,et al.  Measures of Searcher Performance: A Psychometric Evaluation , 1993, Inf. Process. Manag..