Stratospheric sulfate geoengineering could enhance the terrestrial photosynthesis rate

Abstract. Stratospheric sulfate geoengineering could impact the terrestrial carbon cycle by enhancing the carbon sink. With an 8 Tg yr−1 injection of SO2 to produce a stratospheric aerosol cloud to balance anthropogenic radiative forcing from the Representative Concentration Pathway 6.0 (RCP6.0) scenario, we conducted climate model simulations with the Community Earth System Model – the Community Atmospheric Model 4 fully coupled to tropospheric and stratospheric chemistry (CAM4–chem). During the geoengineering period, as compared to RCP6.0, land-averaged downward visible (300–700 nm) diffuse radiation increased 3.2 W m−2 (11 %). The enhanced diffuse radiation combined with the cooling increased plant photosynthesis by 0.07 ± 0.02 µmol C m−2 s−1, which could contribute to an additional 3.8 ± 1.1 Gt C yr−1 global gross primary productivity without explicit nutrient limitation. This increase could potentially increase the land carbon sink. Suppressed plant and soil respiration due to the cooling would reduce natural land carbon emission and therefore further enhance the terrestrial carbon sink during the geoengineering period. This potentially beneficial impact of stratospheric sulfate geoengineering would need to be balanced by a large number of potential risks in any future decisions about the implementation of geoengineering.

[1]  V. Aquila,et al.  Stratospheric ozone response to sulfate geoengineering: Results from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) , 2014 .

[2]  Shingo Watanabe,et al.  A multi-model assessment of regional climate disparities caused by solar geoengineering , 2014 .

[3]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  Climatic Control of the High-Latitude Vegetation Greening Trend and Pinatubo Effect , 2002, Science.

[4]  Mark Lawrence,et al.  The impact of geoengineering on vegetation in experiment G1 of the GeoMIP , 2015 .

[5]  D. Baldocchi,et al.  Effects of diffuse radiation on canopy gas exchange processes in a forest ecosystem , 2008 .

[6]  D. Weisenstein,et al.  The impact of geoengineering aerosols on stratospheric temperature and ozone , 2009 .

[7]  J. Terborgh,et al.  Drought Sensitivity of the Amazon Rainforest , 2009, Science.

[8]  Alan Robock,et al.  Stratospheric aerosol geoengineering , 2015 .

[9]  T. A. Black,et al.  Responses of net ecosystem exchanges of carbon dioxide to changes in cloudiness: Results from two North American deciduous forests , 1999 .

[10]  A. Grini,et al.  Impact of idealized future stratospheric aerosol injection on the large‐scale ocean and land carbon cycles , 2016 .

[11]  M. Bergin,et al.  Impact of atmospheric aerosol light scattering and absorption on terrestrial net primary productivity , 2002 .

[12]  R. Neely,et al.  Representation of the Community Earth System Model (CESM1) CAM4-chem within the Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative (CCMI) , 2016 .

[13]  Ben Kravitz,et al.  Benefits, risks, and costs of stratospheric geoengineering , 2009 .

[14]  T. Vesala,et al.  Advantages of diffuse radiation for terrestrial ecosystem productivity , 2002 .

[15]  A. Robock.  Cooling following large volcanic eruptions corrected for the effect of diffuse radiation on tree rings , 2005 .

[16]  R. Neely,et al.  A Consistent Prescription of Stratospheric Aerosol for Both Radiation and Chemistry in the Community Earth System Model (CESM1) , 2015 .

[17]  Ken Caldeira,et al.  Crop yields in a geoengineered climate , 2012 .

[18]  K. R. Reddy,et al.  Carbon dioxide enrichment and temperature effects on cotton canopy photosynthesis, transpiration, and water-use efficiency☆ , 1995 .

[19]  E. Davidson,et al.  NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS LIMITATION OF BIOMASS GROWTH IN A TROPICAL SECONDARY FOREST , 2004 .

[20]  Markus Reichstein,et al.  Improving canopy processes in the Community Land Model version 4 (CLM4) using global flux fields empirically inferred from FLUXNET data , 2011 .

[21]  C. Timmreck,et al.  The dependency of geoengineered sulfate aerosol on the emission strategy , 2011 .

[22]  K. Taylor,et al.  The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) , 2011 .

[23]  Simone Tilmes,et al.  The Sensitivity of Polar Ozone Depletion to Proposed Geoengineering Schemes , 2008, Science.

[24]  Will Geoengineering With Solar Radiation Management Ever Be Used? , 2012 .

[25]  W. Oechel,et al.  Direct observations of the effects of aerosol loading on net ecosystem CO2 exchanges over different landscapes , 2004 .

[26]  Peter R. J. North,et al.  Control of atmospheric particles on diffuse radiation and terrestrial plant productivity , 2012 .

[27]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Description and evaluation of tropospheric chemistry and aerosols in the Community Earth System Model (CESM1.2) , 2014 .

[28]  Martin Wild,et al.  Global dimming and brightening: A review , 2009 .

[29]  Helmut Hillebrand,et al.  Global analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus limitation of primary producers in freshwater, marine and terrestrial ecosystems. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[30]  Georgiy L. Stenchikov,et al.  Regional climate responses to geoengineering with tropical and Arctic SO2 injections , 2008 .

[31]  Dennis D. Baldocchi,et al.  Response of a Deciduous Forest to the Mount Pinatubo Eruption: Enhanced Photosynthesis , 2003, Science.

[32]  Michael L. Roderick,et al.  Pinatubo, Diffuse Light, and the Carbon Cycle , 2003, Science.

[33]  K. Taylor,et al.  Impact of geoengineering schemes on the global hydrological cycle , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  K. Calvin,et al.  The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300 , 2011 .

[35]  Shingo Watanabe,et al.  The impact of abrupt suspension of solar radiation management (termination effect) in experiment G2 of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) , 2013 .

[36]  Alan Robock,et al.  20 reasons why geoengineering may be a bad idea , 2008 .

[37]  A. Goldstein,et al.  Atmospheric aerosol light scattering and surface wetness influence the diurnal pattern of net ecosystem exchange in a semi-arid ponderosa pine plantation , 2005 .

[38]  S. C. Liu,et al.  Case study of the effects of atmospheric aerosols and regional haze on agriculture: an opportunity to enhance crop yields in China through emission controls? , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[39]  Paul J. Crutzen,et al.  Exploring the geoengineering of climate using stratospheric sulfate aerosols: The role of particle size , 2008 .

[40]  Hauke Schmidt,et al.  Solar irradiance reduction via climate engineering: Impact of different techniques on the energy balance and the hydrological cycle , 2013 .

[41]  A. Rogers,et al.  Elevated CO2 effects on plant carbon, nitrogen, and water relations: six important lessons from FACE. , 2009, Journal of experimental botany.

[42]  P. Cox,et al.  Modeling the volcanic signal in the atmospheric CO2 record , 2001 .

[43]  D. Lawrence,et al.  The CCSM4 Land Simulation, 1850-2005: Assessment of Surface Climate and New Capabilities , 2012 .

[44]  P. Rasch,et al.  An overview of geoengineering of climate using stratospheric sulphate aerosols , 2008, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[45]  Ken Caldeira,et al.  Modeling of solar radiation management: a comparison of simulations using reduced solar constant and stratospheric sulphate aerosols , 2014, Climate Dynamics.

[46]  C. Tucker,et al.  Climate-Driven Increases in Global Terrestrial Net Primary Production from 1982 to 1999 , 2003, Science.

[47]  Shingo Watanabe,et al.  The hydrological impact of geoengineering in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) , 2013 .

[48]  S. Wofsy,et al.  The effects of biomass burning aerosols and clouds on the CO2 flux in Amazonia , 2007 .

[49]  James W. Jones,et al.  Response of vegetation to rising carbon dioxide: Photosynthesis, biomass, and seed yield of soybean , 1987 .

[50]  A. Robock.  Volcanic eruptions and climate , 2000 .

[51]  Alan Robock,et al.  Stratospheric geoengineering impacts on El Niño/Southern Oscillation , 2015 .

[52]  Robert W. Howarth,et al.  Nitrogen limitation on land and in the sea: How can it occur? , 1991 .

[53]  R. Angel.  Feasibility of cooling the Earth with a cloud of small spacecraft near the inner Lagrange point (L1) , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[54]  Arlin J. Krueger,et al.  Global tracking of the SO2 clouds from the June , 1992 .

[55]  P. Crutzen.  Albedo Enhancement by Stratospheric Sulfur Injections: A Contribution to Resolve a Policy Dilemma? , 2006 .

[56]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  A Large and Persistent Carbon Sink in the World’s Forests , 2011, Science.

[57]  A. Robock.  CHAPTER 7:Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering , 2014 .

[58]  Jean-Francois Lamarque,et al.  A new Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) experiment designed for climate and chemistry models , 2014 .

[59]  E. Davidson,et al.  Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change , 2006, Nature.

[60]  J. Haywood,et al.  Fires increase Amazon forest productivity through increases in diffuse radiation , 2015 .

[61]  I. Noble,et al.  On the direct effect of clouds and atmospheric particles on the productivity and structure of vegetation , 2001, Oecologia.

[62]  P. Cox,et al.  Impact of changes in diffuse radiation on the global land carbon sink , 2009, Nature.

[63]  M. Wahlen,et al.  Interannual extremes in the rate of rise of atmospheric carbon dioxide since 1980 , 1995, Nature.

[64]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Interactive comment on “ Description and evaluation of tropospheric chemistry and aerosols in the Community Earth System Model ( CESM 1 . 2 ) ” , 2022 .

[65]  F. Woodward,et al.  Terrestrial Gross Carbon Dioxide Uptake: Global Distribution and Covariation with Climate , 2010, Science.

[66]  T. Wigley,et al.  A Combined Mitigation/Geoengineering Approach to Climate Stabilization , 2006, Science.

[67]  P. Ciais,et al.  A Large Northern Hemisphere Terrestrial CO2 Sink Indicated by the 13C/12C Ratio of Atmospheric CO2 , 1995, Science.

[68]  B. Kravitz,et al.  Arctic cryosphere response in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project G3 and G4 scenarios , 2014 .

[69]  Andy Ridgwell,et al.  Assessing the regional disparities in geoengineering impacts , 2010 .

[70]  D. Jenkinson,et al.  Model estimates of CO2 emissions from soil in response to global warming , 1991, Nature.

[71]  O. Boucher,et al.  Geoengineering by stratospheric SO 2 injection: results from the Met Office HadGEM2 climate model and comparison with the Goddard Institute for Space Studies ModelE , 2010 .

[72]  P. Nowack,et al.  Ozone changes under solar geoengineering: implications for UV exposure and air quality , 2015 .

[73]  J. Lamarque,et al.  CAM-chem: description and evaluation of interactive atmospheric chemistry in the Community Earth System Model , 2012 .

[74]  Ken Caldeira,et al.  Geoengineering Earth's radiation balance to mitigate CO2‐induced climate change , 2000 .

[75]  Shingo Watanabe,et al.  Solar radiation management impacts on agriculture in China: A case study in the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) , 2014 .