HPWS, technology and flexibility in the Spanish manufacturing industry

Purpose - – High-Performance Work Systems (HPWS) are viewed as strategic levers to a firm’s core competencies’ sustainability and continuous competitive advantage. The purpose of this paper is to explore what factors facilitate HPWS utilization, with a particular focus on the extent to which social capital (SC) derived from buyer-supplier relationships functions as a communication channel to spread effective HPWS implementation. Design/methodology/approach - – The authors propose a model of HPWS in which external SC not only favors the use of HPWS but also moderates the incidence of other common facilitators such as technology and flexibility. The study uses data from Spanish manufacturing industry. Findings - – Firms yielding external SC use HPWS more intensely, and the effect of technology constituents on HPWS utilization is contingent on SC accumulation. The findings are consistent with the existing HR literature on the subject but broaden its perspective by analyzing a specific pattern of SC and its pivotal role in the HPWS utilization process. Research limitations/implications - – The cross-sectional nature of the database leaves open the possibility of causality relationship exploration between the variables of interest, which means that any causal interpretation should be cautious and properly motivated. The study is conducted in the Spanish manufacturing industry context, hence aims to generalize its results by explaining the logic behind the coexistence of HPWS and SC on a same conceptual level. This should be carefully treated and could be further strengthened by other country-level research. The approach does not consider the internal synergic mechanisms and the integration of HR practices. Practical implications - – The paper reveals the importance of inter-organizational SC in the Spanish manufacturing industry by showing how its embodiment in buyer-supplier relationships may allow firms to better understand the context in which HPWS are more likely to be useful. Social implications - – The impact of social relationships on effective human resource management practices is highlighted. Originality/value - – The authors explore the factors that facilitate HPWS utilization, with a particular focus on the extent to which SC derived from buyer-supplier relationships functions as a communication channel to spread effective HPWS implementation.

[1]  Jeffrey B. Arthur,et al.  Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover , 1994 .

[2]  Po-Chien Chang,et al.  Crossing the level of employee's performance: HPWS, affective commitment, human capital, and employee job performance in professional service organizations , 2011 .

[3]  Martín Larraza Kintana,et al.  Influencia de las redes proveedor-cliente en la difusión de prácticas avanzadas de gestión de los recursos humanos , 2006 .

[4]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  Knowledge Exchange and Combination: The Role of Human Resource Practices in the Performance of High-Technology Firms , 2006 .

[5]  Dimitrios M. Mihail,et al.  High performance work systems in corporate turnaround: a German case study , 2013 .

[6]  E. Autio,et al.  SOCIAL CAPITAL, KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION, AND KNOWLEDGE EXPLOITATION IN YOUNG TECHNOLOGY-BASED FIRMS , 2001 .

[7]  David P. Lepak,et al.  The Human Resource Architecture: Toward a Theory of Human Capital Allocation and Development , 1999 .

[8]  Abraham Seidmann,et al.  Performance Management Issues in Flexible Manufacturing Systems: An Analytic Perspective , 1993 .

[9]  Carrie R. Leana,et al.  Organizational Social Capital and Employment Practices , 1999 .

[10]  Chih-Hsun Chuang,et al.  Human resource management practices and organizational social capital: The role of industrial characteristics , 2013 .

[11]  Human and organizational capital: typologies among Spanish firms , 2006 .

[12]  Sean A. Way High Performance Work Systems and Intermediate Indicators of Firm Performance Within the US Small Business Sector , 2002 .

[13]  Daniel Beimborn,et al.  How Social Capital Among Information Technology and Business Units Drives Operational Alignment and IT Business Value , 2014, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Réjean Landry,et al.  Does social capital determine innovation? To what extent? , 2002 .

[15]  Emilio Huerta Arribas Los desafíos de la competitividad. La innovación organizativa y tecnológica en la empresa española , 2003 .

[16]  Rebecca R. Kehoe,et al.  The Impact of High-Performance Human Resource Practices on Employees’ Attitudes and Behaviors , 2013 .

[17]  Sanford M. Jacoby,et al.  The Effect of Employer Networks on Workplace Innovation and Training , 2003 .

[18]  Tzu-Shian Han,et al.  Computer-integrated manufacturing and high performance work system: the case of Taiwan , 2010 .

[19]  R. Cordero Changing human resources to make flexible manufacturing systems (FMS) successful , 1997 .

[20]  David P. Lepak,et al.  Human Resource Management, Manufacturing Strategy, and Firm Performance , 1996 .

[21]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  Social Capital, Networks, and Knowledge Transfer , 2005 .

[22]  James Guthrie,et al.  HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND LABOR PRODUCTIVITY: DOES INDUSTRY MATTER? , 2005 .

[23]  W. L. Berry,et al.  Manufacturing flexibility: methods for measuring the impact of product variety on performance in process industries , 1999 .

[24]  Finis Welch,et al.  Education in Production , 1970, Journal of Political Economy.

[25]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks , 1998 .

[26]  David P. Lepak,et al.  How Does Human Resource Management Influence Organizational Outcomes? A Meta-analytic Investigation of Mediating Mechanisms , 2012 .

[27]  K. Lai,et al.  “Black‐box” and “gray‐box” supplier integration in product development: Antecedents, consequences and the moderating role of firm size , 2007 .

[28]  Timothy R. Wojan,et al.  Skills, Flexible Manufacturing Technology, and Work Organization , 2002 .

[29]  Alvaro López-Cabrales,et al.  Leveraging the innovative performance of human capital through HRM and social capital in Spanish firms , 2011 .

[30]  B. Lawson,et al.  Developing social capital in buyer–supplier relationships: The contingent effect of relationship-specific adaptations , 2014 .

[31]  Qingyu Zhang,et al.  Manufacturing flexibility: Defining and analyzing relationships among competence, capability, and customer satisfaction , 2003 .

[32]  Charles H. Fine,et al.  An Empirical Study of Manufacturing Flexibility in Printed Circuit Board Assembly , 1996, Oper. Res..

[33]  José Emilio Navas-López,et al.  Capital social, capital relacional e innovación tecnológica. Una aplicación al sector manufacturero español de alta y media-alta tecnología , 2011 .

[34]  Fernando Martín‐Alcázar,et al.  Strategic human resource management: integrating the universalistic, contingent, configurational and contextual perspectives , 2005 .

[35]  Daniel R. Krause,et al.  Social capital configuration, legal bonds and performance in buyer–supplier relationships , 2011 .

[36]  Daniel R. Krause,et al.  The relationships between supplier development, commitment, social capital accumulation and performance improvement , 2007 .

[37]  Fabrizio Salvador,et al.  Mix flexibility and volume flexibility in a build‐to‐order environment , 2007 .

[38]  Kim Hoque,et al.  HRM in the SME sector: valuable employees and coercive networks , 2005 .

[39]  Brian E. Becker,et al.  HIGH PERFORMANCE WORK SYSTEMS AND FIRM PERFORMANCE : A SYNTHESIS OF RESEARCH AND MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS , 1998 .

[40]  Ming Yan,et al.  A Social Network Perspective on Relationship Management in the Human Resource Outsourcing Network: Examining the Moderating Impact of HR Task Interdependence , 2013 .

[41]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings , 1979 .

[42]  Rupert L. Matthews,et al.  Social capital, a theory for operations management: a systematic review of the evidence , 2012 .

[43]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Taking Stock of Networks and Organizations: A Multilevel Perspective , 2004 .

[44]  Riki Takeuchi,et al.  Employment Flexibility and Firm Performance: Examining the Interaction Effects of Employment Mode, Environmental Dynamism, and Technological Intensity , 2003 .

[45]  L. Gómez-Mejia,et al.  IS CEO PAY IN HIGH-TECHNOLOGY FIRMS RELATED TO INNOVATION? , 2000 .

[46]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[47]  Robert K. Perrons,et al.  Shaping and re-shaping social capital in buyer–supplier relationships , 2011 .

[48]  Martín Larraza Kintana,et al.  High-performance work systems and firms' operational performance: the moderating role of technology , 2006 .

[49]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Taking Stock of Networks and Organizations: A Multilevel Perspective , 2004 .

[50]  Avner Ben-Ner,et al.  Computerization and Skill Bifurcation: The Role of Task Complexity in Creating Skill Gains and Losses , 2013 .

[51]  C. Fey,et al.  When collaborative HR practices may not work well: the moderating role of social capital in the Chinese life insurance industry , 2011 .

[52]  Kent E. Neupert,et al.  Social capital and human resource management in international joint ventures in Vietnam: a perspective from a transitional economy , 2011 .

[53]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  The human equation : building profits by putting people first , 1998 .

[54]  B. Lawson,et al.  Governance and social capital formation in buyer-supplier relationships , 2011 .

[55]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[56]  Nai‐Wen Chi,et al.  Beyond the High‐Performance Paradigm: Exploring the Curvilinear Relationship between High‐Performance Work Systems and Organizational Performance in Taiwanese Manufacturing Firms , 2011 .