Simple Rules for Interspecific Dominance in Systems with Exploitative and Apparent Competition

Because mechanistic models of interspecific interactions are often complex, one should deliberately seek simple unifying principles that transcend system-specific details. Earlier work on resource competition has led to the "R* rule," which states that a dominant competitor suppresses resources to a lower level than any other competing species. This rule describes the outcome of even ornate models of competition. Here we show that analogous simple rules can characterize systems with predation. We first demonstrate, for a simple two-prey, one-predator model without resource competition but with a predator numerical response leading to apparent competition, that the winning prey supports (and withstands) the higher predator density; that is, the outcome is described by a "P* rule." We then develop a general model in which predation is inflicted evenhandedly on two prey species competing for a single resource and show that the R* and P* rules hold: the winning prey both depresses resources to the lowest level and sustains the higher predator density. We next examine a more complex model with differential predation. Assuming a closed system (i.e., a fixed nutrient pool), we portray the four-dimensional system dynamics in a two-dimensional graphical model, and we assess the domain of applicability of simple dominance rules in more complex systems. We address the generality of our conclusions and end by examining the implications of different, reasonable biological constraints for community structure.

[1]  T. Schoener Mechanistic Approaches to Community Ecology: A New Reductionism , 1986 .

[2]  M. Hassell,et al.  The dynamics of predation and competition in patchy environments , 1987 .

[3]  William Gurney,et al.  Two-patch metapopulation dynamics , 1993 .

[4]  Burt P. Kotler,et al.  Short-Term Apparent Competition , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[5]  R. Reader Herbivory as a Confounding Factor in an Experiment Measuring Competition Among Plants , 1992 .

[6]  D. Tilman The Importance of the Mechanisms of Interspecific Competition , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[7]  J. Grover Resource Competition in a Variable Environment: Phytoplankton Growing According to Monod's Model , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[8]  Marcus W. Feldman,et al.  Species Packing and Predation Pressure , 1975 .

[9]  Clark Jeffries,et al.  Stability of Predation Ecosystem Models , 1976 .

[10]  James P. Grover,et al.  Resource Competition in a Variable Environment: Phytoplankton Growing According to the Variable-Internal-Stores Model , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[11]  P. Yodzis,et al.  Introduction to Theoretical Ecology , 1989 .

[12]  G. Tullock,et al.  Competitive Exclusion. , 1960, Science.

[13]  D. L. DeAngelis,et al.  Dynamics of Nutrient Cycling and Food Webs , 1992, Population and Community Biology Series.

[14]  W. Murdoch,et al.  Predation and Population Stability , 1975 .

[15]  Robert A. Armstrong,et al.  Prey Species Replacement along a Gradient of Nutrient Enrichment: A Graphical Approach , 1979 .

[16]  R. J. Schmitt Indirect Interactions Between Prey: Apparent Competition, Predator Aggregation, and Habitat Segregation. , 1987, Ecology.

[17]  Robert D Holt,et al.  Spatial Heterogeneity, Indirect Interactions, and the Coexistence of Prey Species , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[18]  M. A. Leibold,et al.  Resource Edibility and the Effects of Predators and Productivity on the Outcome of Trophic Interactions , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[19]  W. Gurney,et al.  Modelling fluctuating populations , 1982 .

[20]  R. Vance,et al.  Predation and Resource Partitioning in One Predator -- Two Prey Model Communities , 1978, The American Naturalist.

[21]  S. Levin Community Equilibria and Stability, and an Extension of the Competitive Exclusion Principle , 1970, The American Naturalist.

[22]  D. Tilman Resource Competition between Plankton Algae: An Experimental and Theoretical Approach , 1977 .

[23]  P. Abrams Density-Independent Mortality and Interspecific Competition: A Test of Pianka's Niche Overlap Hypothesis , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[24]  V. Hutson,et al.  Permanent coexistence in general models of three interacting species , 1985, Journal of mathematical biology.

[25]  J. Grace,et al.  Mechanisms of plant competition for nutrients: the elements of a predictive theory of competition. , 1990 .