Timing during interruptions in timing.

Duration and location of breaks in time interval production were manipulated in various conditions of stimulus presentation (Experiments 1-4). Produced intervals shortened and then stabilized as break duration lengthened, suggesting that participants used the break as a preparatory period to restart timing as quickly as possible at the end of the break. This interpretation was supported in Experiment 5, in which similar results were obtained with a reaction time response executed at the end of the break. In all experiments, produced intervals lengthened as the break occurred later during the interval. The authors conclude that varying break location and duration reveal, respectively, the influence of attentional time-sharing before the interruption and of preparatory processes taking place during the break.

[1]  P. J. Foley.  The foreperiod and simple reaction time. , 1959, Canadian journal of psychology.

[2]  Claudette Fortin,et al.  Attentional Time-Sharing in Interval Timing , 2003 .

[3]  R M Church,et al.  Scalar Timing in Memory , 1984, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Helga Lejeune,et al.  Prospective timing, attention and the switch A response to ‘Gating or switching? gating is a better model of prospective timing’ by Zakay , 2000, Behavioural Processes.

[5]  D. Nitzan,et al.  The influence of task difficulty and external tempo on subjective time estimation , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  R. Block,et al.  The role of attention in time estimation processes , 1996 .

[7]  Ewart A. C. Thomas,et al.  Cognitive processing and time perception , 1975 .

[8]  W H Meck,et al.  Timing for the absence of a stimulus: the gap paradigm reversed. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[9]  Scott W. Brown.  Attentional resources in timing: Interference effects in concurrent temporal and nontemporal working memory tasks , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  Dan Zakay,et al.  Gating or switching? Gating is a better model of prospective timing (a response to ‘switching or gating?’ by Lejeune) 1 Originally published in Vol. 50, issue 1, pages 1–17; PII of the original publication: S0376-6357(00)00086-3. 1 , 2000, Behavioural Processes.

[11]  W. Meck.  Attentional Bias between Modalities: Effect on the Internal Clock, Memory, and Decision Stages Used in Animal Time Discrimination a , 1984, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[12]  D H DRAZIN,et al.  Effects of foreperiod, foreperiod variability, and probability of stimulus occurrence on simple reaction time. , 1961, Journal of experimental psychology.

[13]  Risto N t nen.  Attention and brain function , 1992 .

[14]  I. Stilitz,et al.  Conditional Probability and Components of RT in the Variable Foreperiod Experiment , 1972, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  James C. Craig,et al.  A constant error in the perception of brief temporal intervals , 1973 .

[16]  J. Gibbon,et al.  Timing and time perception. , 1984, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[17]  Lucinda Mcclain,et al.  Interval estimation: Effect of processing demands on prospective and retrospective reports , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  C Fortin,et al.  Expecting a break in time estimation: attentional time-sharing without concurrent processing. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[19]  M. Posner,et al.  Visual dominance: an information-processing account of its origins and significance. , 1976, Psychological review.

[20]  Sylvan Kornblum,et al.  Simple reaction time as a race between signal detection and time estimation: A paradigm and model , 1973 .

[21]  C. M. Bradshaw,et al.  Time and behaviour : psychological and neurobehavioural analyses , 1997 .

[22]  D A Rosenbaum,et al.  Timing and reaction time. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[23]  P. Bertelson,et al.  The time-course of preparation: Confirmatory results with visual and auditory warning signals , 1969 .

[24]  J. Artieda,et al.  Time, internal clocks, and movement , 1996 .

[25]  Sébastien Tremblay,et al.  Break expectancy in duration discrimination. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[27]  P. Niemi,et al.  Stimulus intensity effects on auditory and visual reaction processes. , 1979, Acta psychologica.

[28]  Alick Elithorn,et al.  Central Inhibition—Some Refractory Observations , 1955 .

[29]  Robert Rousseau,et al.  An Adaptive Counter Model for Time Estimation , 1984 .

[30]  W. Meck.  Functional and neural mechanisms of interval timing , 2003 .

[31]  J. Requin,et al.  The effect of conditional probability of the response signal on the simple reaction time. , 1969, Acta psychologica.

[32]  G. Kellas,et al.  Interactive effects of preparatory intervals, stimulus intensity, and experimental design on reaction time , 1969 .

[33]  M. J. Billington,et al.  The Deadline model for simple reaction times , 1972 .

[34]  S. W. Brown,et al.  Time perception and attention: The effects of prospective versus retrospective paradigms and task demands on perceived duration , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[35]  L. Karlin.  Reaction time as a function of foreperiod duration and variability. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[36]  F. Macar,et al.  Effects of attention manipulation on judgments of duration and of intensity in the visual modality , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[37]  W. James,et al.  The Principles of Psychology. , 1983 .

[38]  H. Lejeune.  Switching or gating? The attentional challenge in cognitive models of psychological time , 1998, Behavioural Processes.

[39]  R. Duncan Luce,et al.  Response Times: Their Role in Inferring Elementary Mental Organization , 1986 .

[40]  F. Macar.  Expectancy, controlled attention and automatic attention in prospective temporal judgments. , 2002, Acta psychologica.

[41]  J. Requin,et al.  Effects of a Timing Signal on Simple Reaction Time with a Rectangular Distribution of Foreperiods , 1973 .

[42]  R. Davis,et al.  The Role of “Attention” in the Psychological Refractory Period , 1959 .

[43]  F. Macar,et al.  Controlled attention sharing influences time estimation , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[44]  Russell M. Church,et al.  Chapter 2 Timing and temporal search , 1997 .

[45]  R. Elliott.  Some confounding factors in the study preparatory set in reaction time , 1973, Memory & cognition.