User trust in social networking services: A comparison of Facebook and LinkedIn

The innovative social networking services (SNS) provide people with versatile personal, commerce, and social applications. This study compares Facebook and LinkedIn to better understand factors affecting users' trust on SNS. Subject domain experts were invited to participate in qualitative research based interviews. Using the refined research model a quantitative empirical study was designed and conducted to investigate the relationships between important constructs including effort expectancy, social influence, privacy concern, perceived risk, trust, and continuance intention. Users' trust on SNS is mainly influenced by effort expectancy, social influence, and perceived risk. The impacts of influential factors are different between Facebook and LinkedIn user groups. Our empirical results imply that when the positive influences, such as effort expectancy of the online community, users from different SNS have different needs in social reputation, or high security compliance, in consideration of the negative influence of perceived risk to users' trust when continuing to use the SNS. This study presents a conceptual framework using extant theories and models to form a foundation for SNS incorporating the important factors of trust and privacy concerns. Effort expectancy and social influence affect users' intention more than privacy.Users' perceptions and trust between Facebook and LinkedIn are different.Users' perception of privacy affects trust, attitudes, and usage intention.

[1]  Il Im,et al.  An international comparison of technology adoption: Testing the UTAUT model , 2011, Inf. Manag..

[2]  Eric W. T. Ngai,et al.  Social media models, technologies, and applications: An academic review and case study , 2015, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[3]  Julian L. Simon,et al.  Basic research methods in social science , 1985 .

[4]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model , 2003, MIS Q..

[5]  Jong Hyuk Park,et al.  Privacy and fair information practices in ubiquitous environments: Research challenges and future directions , 2009, Internet Res..

[6]  Chun-Ming Chang,et al.  Exploring the antecedents of trust in virtual communities , 2011, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[7]  Gheorghe Jinga,et al.  Organizations` Responsibility in Maintaining the Security of Personal Data posted Online by Romanian Consumers: an Exploratory Analysis of Facebook and Linkedin , 2014 .

[8]  Blair H. Sheppard,et al.  The Grammars of Trust: A Model and General Implications , 1998 .

[9]  Shuchih Ernest Chang,et al.  Exploring privacy and trust for employee monitoring , 2015, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[10]  Damien Wilson,et al.  Tensions and ties in social media networks: Towards a model of understanding business relationship development and business performance enhancement through the use of LinkedIn , 2016 .

[11]  Charles J. Kacmar,et al.  Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce: An Integrative Typology , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[13]  Jan Muntermann,et al.  The Economic Impact of Privacy Violations and Security Breaches , 2014, Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng..

[14]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Model of Acceptance with Peer Support: A Social Network Perspective to Understand Employees' System Use , 2009, MIS Q..

[15]  Ki Joon Kim,et al.  What drives successful social networking services? A comparative analysis of user acceptance of Facebook and Twitter , 2014 .

[16]  Heikki Karjaluoto,et al.  Mobile banking adoption: A literature review , 2015, Telematics Informatics.

[17]  Bela Florenthal,et al.  Applying uses and gratifications theory to students’ LinkedIn usage , 2015 .

[18]  Joshua Fogel,et al.  Internet social network communities: Risk taking, trust, and privacy concerns , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[19]  Naresh K. Malhotra,et al.  Internet Users' Information Privacy Concerns (IUIPC): The Construct, the Scale, and a Causal Model , 2004, Inf. Syst. Res..

[20]  Florian Probst,et al.  Online social networks: A survey of a global phenomenon , 2012 .

[21]  Jessica Pater,et al.  Communities of participation: A comparison of disability and aging identified groups on Facebook and LinkedIn , 2013, Telematics Informatics.

[22]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[23]  Joseph P. Cannon,et al.  Understanding the Influence of National Culture on the Development of Trust , 1998 .

[24]  Á. H. Crespo,et al.  The influence of perceived risk on Internet shopping behavior: a multidimensional perspective , 2009 .

[25]  Nancy K. Lankton,et al.  What does it mean to trust facebook?: examining technology and interpersonal trust beliefs , 2011, DATB.

[26]  Ardion Beldad,et al.  How shall I trust the faceless and the intangible? A literature review on the antecedents of online trust , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[27]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[28]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  When social networks cross boundaries: a case study of workplace use of facebook and linkedin , 2009, GROUP.

[29]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  A Methodology for Analyzing Web-Based Qualitative Data , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Robert G. Capra,et al.  Factors mediating disclosure in social network sites , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[31]  Cynthia K. Riemenschneider,et al.  Understanding it adoption decisions in small business: integrating current theories , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[32]  Hyunsun Park,et al.  Effects of various characteristics of social commerce (s-commerce) on consumers' trust and trust performance , 2013, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[33]  Li Qin,et al.  Impact of Privacy Concern in Social Networking Websites , 2012, Internet Res..

[34]  Efraim Turban,et al.  Enterprise Social Networking: Opportunities, Adoption, and Risk Mitigation , 2011, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[35]  Dong-Hee Shin,et al.  The effects of trust, security and privacy in social networking: A security-based approach to understand the pattern of adoption , 2010, Interact. Comput..

[36]  R. Staelin,et al.  A Model of Perceived Risk and Intended Risk-handling Activity , 1994 .

[37]  Audun Jøsang,et al.  A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[38]  Lars Torsten Eriksson,et al.  Bridging and bonding forms of social capital in a regional strategic network , 2011 .

[39]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  Understanding Continued Information Technology Usage Behavior: A Comparison of Three Models in the Context of Mobile Internet , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[40]  Yuan Li,et al.  Empirical Studies on Online Information Privacy Concerns: Literature Review and an Integrative Framework , 2011, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[41]  Jun Myers,et al.  Teaching Students Self-Advertising/Marketing Skills in the Age of Social Media: Designing an Experiential Exercise , 2011 .

[42]  John Hulland,et al.  Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies , 1999 .

[43]  Anabel Quan-Haase,et al.  PRIVACY PROTECTION STRATEGIES ON FACEBOOK , 2013 .

[44]  Morris Sloman,et al.  A survey of trust in internet applications , 2000, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[45]  C. H. Lawshe A QUANTITATIVE APPROACH TO CONTENT VALIDITY , 1975 .

[46]  Jens Riegelsberger,et al.  The mechanics of trust: A framework for research and design , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[47]  Jinsoo Park,et al.  Risk-Focused E-Commerce Adoption Model: A Cross-Country Study , 2004 .

[48]  Oliver Günther,et al.  Self-disclosure and Privacy Calculus on Social Networking Sites: The Role of Culture , 2012, WI 2012.

[49]  Michel Tenenhaus,et al.  PLS path modeling , 2005, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[50]  ChangHyun Jin,et al.  The perspective of a revised TRAM on social capital building: The case of Facebook usage , 2013, Inf. Manag..

[51]  Dragan Manasijevic,et al.  Exploring students' purposes of usage and educational usage of Facebook , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[52]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Individual Trust in Online Firms: Scale Development and Initial Test , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[53]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic - Mail Emotion/Adoption Study , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[54]  Garry Wei-Han Tan,et al.  Why consumers adopt mobile payment? A partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) approach , 2015, Int. J. Mob. Commun..

[55]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[56]  Tao Zhou,et al.  Understanding mobile SNS continuance usage in China from the perspectives of social influence and privacy concern , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[57]  Anastasia Papazafeiropoulou,et al.  Why people keep coming back to Facebook: Explaining and predicting continuance participation from an extended theory of planned behaviour perspective , 2013, Decis. Support Syst..

[58]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet , 2011 .

[59]  Tomoki Sekiguchi,et al.  The Use of Social Network Sites in the Workplace: a Case Study in Brazilian Companies , 2014 .

[60]  Po-An Chen,et al.  Exploring social networking sites for facilitating multi-channel retailing , 2013, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[61]  Tao Zhou,et al.  Integrating TTF and UTAUT to explain mobile banking user adoption , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[62]  Tao Zhou,et al.  User Adoption of Location-based Services , 2011, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[63]  Bellarmine A. Ezumah College Students' Use of Social Media: Site Preferences, Uses and Gratifications Theory Revisited , 2013 .

[64]  Stuart J. Barnes,et al.  Initial trust and online buyer behaviour , 2007, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..