Effect of the feed and draw solution temperatures on PRO performance: Theoretical and experimental study

Abstract In this study, a model for the water flux and the salt flux for a flat sheet membrane in pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) is developed and experimentally validated. The model focuses in the effects of operating conditions (feed and draw solution concentrations, flow rate, and temperature) on PRO performance. The validation results show a good predictability of the models under different operating conditions. An improvement of the PRO performance was shown by increasing the bulk solution temperature and the flow rate. The study of the effect of these temperatures on the performance of the PRO revealed that the feed solution temperature has a stronger impact on the membrane parameter of the PRO performance comparing to the draw water temperature. However, the increase of the water flux which resulted from the increase of the feed solution temperature is accompanied by a high salt diffusion inducing a severe internal concentration polarization (ICP). The strong relationship between the water flux and the salt flux is shown to be due to the intrinsic tradeoff between permeability and selectivity.

[1]  Tai‐Shung Chung,et al.  High performance thin film composite pressure retarded osmosis (PRO) membranes for renewable salinity-gradient energy generation , 2013 .

[2]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Membrane-based processes for sustainable power generation using water , 2012, Nature.

[3]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Gypsum scaling in pressure retarded osmosis: experiments, mechanisms and implications. , 2014, Water research.

[4]  Tai‐Shung Chung,et al.  Thin-film composite P84 co-polyimide hollow fiber membranes for osmotic power generation , 2014 .

[5]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  Power generation with pressure retarded osmosis: An experimental and theoretical investigation , 2009 .

[6]  J. Post,et al.  Salinity-gradient power : Evaluation of pressure-retarded osmosis and reverse electrodialysis , 2007 .

[7]  Stein Erik Skilhagen,et al.  Osmotic power — power production based on the osmotic pressure difference between waters with varying salt gradients , 2008 .

[8]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments , 2006 .

[9]  Xue Li,et al.  Emerging forward osmosis (FO) technologies and challenges ahead for clean water and clean energy applications , 2012 .

[10]  I.W.M. Pothof,et al.  Feasibility of osmotic power from a hydrodynamic analysis at module and plant scale , 2012 .

[11]  How Yong Ng,et al.  Modified models to predict flux behavior in forward osmosis in consideration of external and internal concentration polarizations , 2008 .

[12]  J. McCutcheon,et al.  Influence of concentrative and dilutive internal concentration polarization on flux behavior in forward osmosis , 2006 .

[13]  Klaus-Viktor Peinemann,et al.  Membranes for Power Generation by Pressure Retarded Osmosis , 2008 .

[14]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Computational fluid dynamics simulations of flow and concentration polarization in forward osmosis membrane systems , 2011 .

[15]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Thin-film composite hollow fiber membranes for Pressure Retarded Osmosis (PRO) process with high power density , 2012 .

[16]  Yongsheng Fan,et al.  Blue energy: Current technologies for sustainable power generation from water salinity gradient , 2014 .

[17]  Fernando Tadeo,et al.  Evaluation of the recovery of osmotic energy in desalination plants by using pressure retarded osmosis , 2013 .

[18]  Tai‐Shung Chung,et al.  Design of robust hollow fiber membranes with high power density for osmotic energy production , 2014 .

[19]  F. Tadeo,et al.  Energy recovery using salinity differences in a multi-effect distillation system , 2014 .

[20]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Effect of feed spacer induced membrane deformation on the performance of pressure retarded osmosis (PRO): Implications for PRO process operation , 2013 .

[21]  Andrea Achilli,et al.  Pressure retarded osmosis: From the vision of Sidney Loeb to the first prototype installation — Review , 2010 .

[22]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Osmotic power production from salinity gradient resource by pressure retarded osmosis: Effects of operating conditions and reverse solute diffusion , 2012 .

[23]  T. Schiestel,et al.  Evaluation of the potential of osmotic energy as renewable energy source in realistic conditions , 2013 .

[24]  Linda Zou,et al.  Recent developments in forward osmosis : opportunities and challenges. , 2012 .

[25]  S. Loeb,et al.  Production of energy from concentrated brines by pressure-retarded osmosis : II. Experimental results and projected energy costs , 1976 .

[26]  Ngai Yin Yip,et al.  Thin-film composite pressure retarded osmosis membranes for sustainable power generation from salinity gradients. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[27]  A. Bejan,et al.  Convection in Porous Media , 1992 .

[28]  R. E. Pattle Production of Electric Power by mixing Fresh and Salt Water in the Hydroelectric Pile , 1954, Nature.

[29]  E. D. Skouras,et al.  Heat transfer and natural convection of nanofluids in porous media , 2014 .

[30]  F. Spellman,et al.  Environmental Science: Principles and Practices , 2013 .

[31]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Organic fouling in pressure retarded osmosis: Experiments, mechanisms and implications , 2013 .

[32]  R. Baker,et al.  Membranes for power generation by pressure-retarded osmosis , 1981 .

[33]  Jeffrey A. Ruskowitz,et al.  RO-PRO desalination: An integrated low-energy approach to seawater desalination , 2014 .

[34]  J. McCutcheon,et al.  Internal concentration polarization in forward osmosis: role of membrane orientation , 2006 .

[35]  S. Loeb Energy production at the Dead Sea by pressure-retarded osmosis: challenge or chimera? , 1998 .

[36]  Nanqi Ren,et al.  Temperature as a factor affecting transmembrane water flux in forward osmosis: Steady-state modeling and experimental validation , 2012 .

[37]  Rashad Danoun Desalination plants: Potential impacts of brine discharge on marine life , 2007 .

[38]  Sui Zhang,et al.  POSS-containing delamination-free dual-layer hollow fiber membranes for forward osmosis and osmotic power generation , 2013 .

[39]  Tai‐Shung Chung,et al.  Deformation and reinforcement of thin-film composite (TFC) polyamide-imide (PAI) membranes for osmotic power generation , 2013 .

[40]  Stephen R Gray,et al.  Fabrication of thin film composite poly(amide)-carbon-nanotube supported membranes for enhanced performance in osmotically driven desalination systems , 2013 .