Information Gathering with Peers: Submodular Optimization with Peer-Prediction Constraints

We study a problem of optimal information gathering from multiple data providers that need to be incentivized to provide accurate information. This problem arises in many real world applications that rely on crowdsourced data sets, but where the process of obtaining data is costly. A notable example of such a scenario is crowd sensing. To this end, we formulate the problem of optimal information gathering as maximization of a submodular function under a budget constraint, where the budget represents the total expected payment to data providers. Contrary to the existing approaches, we base our payments on incentives for accuracy and truthfulness, in particular, {\em peer-prediction} methods that score each of the selected data providers against its best peer, while ensuring that the minimum expected payment is above a given threshold. We first show that the problem at hand is hard to approximate within a constant factor that is not dependent on the properties of the payment function. However, for given topological and analytical properties of the instance, we construct two greedy algorithms, respectively called PPCGreedy and PPCGreedyIter, and establish theoretical bounds on their performance w.r.t. the optimal solution. Finally, we evaluate our methods using a realistic crowd sensing testbed.

[1]  Boi Faltings,et al.  Game Theory for Data Science: Eliciting Truthful Information , 2017, Game Theory for Data Science.

[2]  A. Raftery,et al.  Strictly Proper Scoring Rules, Prediction, and Estimation , 2007 .

[3]  Rishabh K. Iyer,et al.  Submodular Optimization with Submodular Cover and Submodular Knapsack Constraints , 2013, NIPS.

[4]  Laura A. Dabbish,et al.  Labeling images with a computer game , 2004, AAAI Spring Symposium: Knowledge Collection from Volunteer Contributors.

[5]  V. Shnayder,et al.  Informed Truthfulness in MultiTask Peer Prediction ( Working paper ) , 2016 .

[6]  Boi Faltings,et al.  Incentives for Effort in Crowdsourcing Using the Peer Truth Serum , 2016, ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol..

[7]  Andreas Krause,et al.  Selecting Sequences of Items via Submodular Maximization , 2017, AAAI.

[8]  Andreas Krause,et al.  Proper Proxy Scoring Rules , 2017, AAAI.

[9]  Kevin Leyton-Brown,et al.  Incentivizing Evaluation via Limited Access to Ground Truth: Peer-Prediction Makes Things Worse , 2016, ArXiv.

[10]  David C. Parkes,et al.  A Robust Bayesian Truth Serum for Small Populations , 2012, AAAI.

[11]  Boi Faltings,et al.  Incentive Mechanisms for Community Sensing , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[12]  Boi Faltings,et al.  Incentives for Answering Hypothetical Questions , 2011 .

[13]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[14]  Ryen W. White,et al.  Stochastic Privacy , 2014, AAAI.

[15]  Grant Schoenebeck,et al.  G T ] 3 M ay 2 01 6 A Framework For Designing Information Elicitation Mechanisms That Reward Truth-telling Yuqing Kong University of Michigan , 2016 .

[16]  Yang Liu,et al.  Learning to Incentivize: Eliciting Effort via Output Agreement , 2016, IJCAI.

[17]  Anirban Dasgupta,et al.  Crowdsourced judgement elicitation with endogenous proficiency , 2013, WWW.

[18]  Nicole Immorlica,et al.  A combinatorial allocation mechanism with penalties for banner advertising , 2008, WWW.

[19]  Rishabh K. Iyer,et al.  Curvature and Optimal Algorithms for Learning and Minimizing Submodular Functions , 2013, NIPS.

[20]  Andreas Krause,et al.  Submodular Function Maximization , 2014, Tractability.

[21]  David M. Pennock,et al.  A Utility Framework for Bounded-Loss Market Makers , 2007, UAI.

[22]  Andreas Krause,et al.  Incentives for Privacy Tradeoff in Community Sensing , 2013, HCOMP.

[23]  Jens Witkowski,et al.  A Geometric Method to Construct Minimal Peer Prediction Mechanisms , 2016, AAAI.

[24]  Yiling Chen,et al.  Output Agreement Mechanisms and Common Knowledge , 2014, HCOMP.

[25]  J. Håstad Clique is hard to approximate withinn1−ε , 1999 .

[26]  Andreas Krause,et al.  Crowd Access Path Optimization: Diversity Matters , 2015, HCOMP.

[27]  Boi Faltings,et al.  A Robust Bayesian Truth Serum for Non-Binary Signals , 2013, AAAI.

[28]  Paul Resnick,et al.  Eliciting Informative Feedback: The Peer-Prediction Method , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[29]  Maxim Sviridenko,et al.  A note on maximizing a submodular set function subject to a knapsack constraint , 2004, Oper. Res. Lett..

[30]  Aurélien Baillon,et al.  Bayesian markets to elicit private information , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Andreas Krause,et al.  Information Gathering in Networks via Active Exploration , 2015, IJCAI.

[32]  Arpit Agarwal,et al.  Informed Truthfulness in Multi-Task Peer Prediction , 2016, EC.

[33]  Andreas Krause,et al.  Submodularity and its applications in optimized information gathering , 2011, TIST.

[34]  D. Prelec A Bayesian Truth Serum for Subjective Data , 2004, Science.