Influence of subjects' height on the stabilization of posture.

In order to investigate the influence of subjects' height in stabilization of body sway, postural EMG reactions were analysed following perturbation of posture during stance on a force measuring platform. Perturbing momenta of different strengths were unexpectedly applied at the back (level of the center of gravity) after being matched to the body weight of each subject. EMG activity of the antagonistic leg muscles and head, hip and ankle joint movements were recorded. There was a close correlation between displacement amplitude at the ankle joint and height of the subject, with the largest displacements in small subjects. The consequence of this relationship was that 1) The compensatory reactions consisted of larger gastrocnemius responses and a stronger coactivation of the tibialis anterior; 2) Momenta of increasing strength resulted in a larger increment of both ankle joint displacement and gastrocnemius EMG responses in small compared to larger subjects. In analogy to tip-toeing movements, it is concluded that the coactivation pattern is typical for stance conditions with a restricted area of support in order to reduce body sway. On the basis of latency measurements it is suggested that the response pattern is induced by proprioceptive information from the impact site of the momentum.

[1]  V. Dietz,et al.  Interlimb coordination of leg-muscle activation during perturbation of stance in humans. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  V. Dietz,et al.  Normal and impaired development of children's gait. , 1984, Human neurobiology.

[3]  Visual influence on postural reactions to sudden antero-posterior support surface movements. , 1991, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[4]  V. Dietz,et al.  Reproducibility and adaptation of the EMG responses of the lower leg following perturbations of upright stance. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  V. Dietz,et al.  Stance and gait perturbations in children: developmental aspects of compensatory mechanisms. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[6]  V. Dietz,et al.  The contribution of vestibular input to the stabilization of human posture: A new experimental approach , 1988, Neuroscience Letters.

[7]  A. Berthoz,et al.  Visual contribution to rapid motor responses during postural control , 1978, Brain Research.

[8]  W. M. Saziorski,et al.  Biomechanik des menschlichen Bewegungsapparates , 1984 .

[9]  B. Guschlbauer,et al.  The significance of proprioception on postural stabilization as assessed by ischemia , 1984, Brain Research.

[10]  H. Forssberg,et al.  Ontogenetic development of postural control in man: adaptation to altered support and visual conditions during stance , 1982, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[11]  P. Matthews Reflex control of posture and movement (Progress in brain research, vol. 50), by R. Granit and O. Pompeiano (eds.), xv + 827 pages, 338 illustrations, 6 tables, Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press, Amsterdam, 1979, US$ 122.00, Dfl 250.00 , 1981, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[12]  J. F. Soechting,et al.  The role of vision in the control of posture during linear motion. , 1979, Progress in brain research.

[13]  J Quintern,et al.  Stumbling reactions in man: significance of proprioceptive and pre‐programmed mechanisms. , 1987, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  T. Brandt,et al.  Disorders of posture and gait. , 1990, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[15]  V. Dietz,et al.  Pathophysiology of gait in children with cerebral palsy. , 1982, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[16]  V. Dietz,et al.  Involvement of different receptors in the regulation of human posture , 1988, Neuroscience Letters.