Interpreting elementary science teacher responsiveness through epistemological framing

In this study we build on the closely related constructs of teacher attention and responsiveness to explore how one fifth-grade teacher facilitates scientific inquiry. We illustrate the dual use of responsiveness and framing through the case study of Mrs. Charles, who skillfully elicits and builds on students' ideas in her science classroom. In our analysis, we found that ranking the extent of this teacher's responsiveness was inadequate for describing the nature of her teaching and for uncovering ways in which this teacher might progress. Analyzing Mrs. Charles's practice in terms of her framing of the situation, however, began to reveal patterns and nuances in the nature of her responsiveness. We argue that it is through the overlay of her epistemological framing onto an analysis of her responsiveness that we get a fuller picture of Mrs. Charles's practice: inviting and valuing students' contributions while encouraging exploration of certain ideas over others.

[1]  Deborah Tannen,et al.  Framing in Discourse , 1993 .

[2]  J. Clement.  Analysis of Clinical Interviews: Foundations and model viability , 2000 .

[3]  Elizabeth Fennema,et al.  Capturing Teachers’ Generative Change: A Follow-Up Study of Professional Development in Mathematics , 2001 .

[4]  A. diSessa.  Toward an Epistemology of Physics , 1993 .

[5]  J. Shea.  National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[6]  Rosemary S. Russ,et al.  Recognizing mechanistic reasoning in student scientific inquiry: A framework for discourse analysis developed from philosophy of science , 2008 .

[7]  M. G. Sherin,et al.  Effects of Video Club Participation on Teachers' Professional Vision , 2009 .

[8]  Andrew Elby,et al.  Resources , framing , and transfer , 2004 .

[9]  Randy L. Bell,et al.  The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural , 1998 .

[10]  B. Reiser,et al.  Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners , 2009 .

[11]  Loucas T. Louca,et al.  Epistemological Resources: Applying a New Epistemological Framework to Science Instruction , 2004 .

[12]  Kathleen E. Metz.  Reassessment of Developmental Constraints on Children’s Science Instruction , 1995 .

[13]  E. Goffman.  Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience , 1974 .

[14]  David Hammer,et al.  Identifying Inquiry and Conceptualizing Students’ Abilities , 2008 .

[15]  Mark Windschitl,et al.  Folk theories of “inquiry:” How preservice teachers reproduce the discourse and practices of an atheoretical scientific method , 2004 .

[16]  J. Mestre.  Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective , 2005 .

[17]  William F. McComas,et al.  THE PRINCIPAL ELEMENTS OF THE NATURE OF SCIENCE: DISPELLING THE MYTHS , 1998 .

[18]  C. Chinn,et al.  Epistemologically Authentic Inquiry in Schools: A Theoretical Framework for Evaluating Inquiry Tasks , 2002 .

[19]  Fouad Abd-El-Khalick,et al.  Improving science teachers' conceptions of nature of science: a critical review of the literature , 2000 .

[20]  D. Levin.  What secondary science teachers pay attention to in the classroom: Situating teaching in institutional and social systems , 2008 .

[21]  Susan B. Empson,et al.  Learning to Listen to Children’s Mathematics , 2008 .

[22]  Russell Tytler,et al.  From “Try It and See” to strategic exploration: Characterizing young children's scientific reasoning , 2004 .

[23]  H. Schweingruber,et al.  TAKING SCIENCE TO SCHOOL: LEARNING AND TEACHING SCIENCE IN GRADES K-8 , 2007 .

[24]  A. Collins.  National Science Education Standards: A Political Document. , 1998 .

[25]  Norman G. Lederman.  Teachers' Understanding of the Nature of Science and Classroom Practice: Factors That Facilitate or Impede the Relationship. , 1999 .

[26]  Brenda H. Frankel.  Teachers' Professional Development and the Elementary Mathematics Classroom: Bringing Understandings to Light , 2005 .

[27]  Jessica Pierson,et al.  The relationship between patterns of classroom discourse and mathematics learning , 2008 .

[28]  Jessica Thompson,et al.  LEARNING PROGRESSIONS AS VISION TOOLS FOR ADVANCING TEACHERSʼ PEDAGOGICAL PERFORMANCE , 2009 .

[29]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .