Prosodic Breaks in Sentence Processing Investigated by Event-Related Potentials

Prosodic breaks (PBs) can indicate a sentence’s syntactic structure. Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) are an excellent way to study auditory sentence processing, since they provide an on-line measure across a complete sentence, in contrast to other on- and off-line methods. ERPs for the first time allowed investigating the processing of a PB itself. PBs reliably elicit a closure positive shift (CPS). We first review several studies on the CPS, leading to the conclusion that it is elicited by abstract structuring or phrasing of the input. Then we review ERP findings concerning the role of PBs in sentence processing as indicated by ERP components like the N400, P600 and LAN. We focus on whether and how PBs can (help to) disambiguate locally ambiguous sentences. Differences in results between different studies can be related to differences in items, initial parsing preferences and tasks. Finally, directions for future research are discussed.

[1]  A D Friederici,et al.  Prosodic Boundaries, Comma Rules, and Brain Responses: The Closure Positive Shift in ERPs as a Universal Marker for Prosodic Phrasing in Listeners and Readers , 2001, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[2]  Anne Cutler,et al.  Introduction. Models and Measurements in the Study of Prosody , 1983 .

[3]  Lesley Stirling,et al.  Does Prosody Support or Direct Sentence Processing , 1996 .

[4]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Sentence processing in the visual and auditory modality: Do comma and prosodic break have parallel functions? , 2008, Brain Research.

[5]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992,45A (1) 73-87 Prosodic Effects in Minimal Attachment , 2022 .

[6]  Karsten Steinhauer,et al.  Effects of Cooperating and Conflicting Prosody in Spoken English Garden Path Sentences: ERP Evidence for the Boundary Deletion Hypothesis , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  Hyekyung Hwang,et al.  Phrase Length Matters: The Interplay between Implicit Prosody and Syntax in Korean “Garden Path” Sentences , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  Karsten Steinhauer.  Electrophysiological correlates of prosody and punctuation , 2003, Brain and Language.

[9]  Gina R. Kuperberg,et al.  Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax , 2007, Brain Research.

[10]  J. Trueswell,et al.  Using prosody to avoid ambiguity: Effects of speaker awareness and referential context , 2003 .

[11]  Zhixing Jin,et al.  The effects of punctuations in Chinese sentence comprehension: An ERP study , 2010, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[12]  M. Kutas,et al.  Psycholinguistics Electrified II (1994–2005) , 2006 .

[13]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Brain potentials indicate immediate use of prosodic cues in natural speech processing , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  Jutta L. Mueller,et al.  Native and Nonnative Speakers' Processing of a Miniature Version of Japanese as Revealed by ERPs , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  C. Clifton,et al.  Prosodic Boundaries in Adjunct Attachment , 2001 .

[16]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  The perception of musical phrase structure: A cross-cultural ERP study , 2006, Brain Research.

[17]  M. Rugg,et al.  Electrophysiology of Mind: Event-Related Brain Potentials and Cognition , 1995 .

[18]  L. Streeter.  Acoustic determinants of phrase boundary perception. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  O. Witte,et al.  Perception of phrase structure in music , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[20]  C. Clifton,et al.  Prosodic phrasing is central to language comprehension , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Non-musicians’ perception of phrase boundaries in music: A cross-cultural ERP study , 2009, Biological Psychology.

[22]  H. Kolk,et al.  Structure and limited capacity in verbal working memory: A study with event-related potentials , 2003, Brain and Language.

[23]  Karsten Steinhauer,et al.  Prosody–syntax interactions in aging: Event-related potentials reveal dissociations between on-line and off-line measures , 2010, Neuroscience Letters.

[24]  Anne Lacheret,et al.  On-line Processing of Pop-Out Words in Spoken French Dialogues , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  Stefan Heim,et al.  Focus on focus: The brain’s electrophysiological response to focus particles and accents in German , 2007 .

[26]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  The Role of Prosodic Breaks and Pitch Accents in Grouping Words during On-line Sentence Processing , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  D. Swinney,et al.  Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[28]  M. Kjelgaard,et al.  Prosodic Facilitation and Interference in the Resolution of Temporary Syntactic Closure Ambiguity , 1999 .

[29]  W S Murray,et al.  Prosodic form and parsing commitments , 1996, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[30]  S. Brennan,et al.  Prosodic disambiguation of syntactic structure: For the speaker or for the addressee? , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.

[31]  E. Grabe,et al.  Prosody, phonology and parsing in closure ambiguities , 1995 .

[32]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Influence of Prosodic Information on the Processing of Split Particles: ERP Evidence from Spoken German , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Effects of Musical Expertise and Boundary Markers on Phrase Perception in Music , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  Ulrike Toepel,et al.  Catching the news: Processing strategies in listening to dialogs as measured by ERPs , 2007, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[35]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  The extended argument dependency model: a neurocognitive approach to sentence comprehension across languages. , 2006, Psychological review.

[36]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Journal of Memory and Language , 2001 .

[37]  A. Friederici,et al.  Word category and verb–argument structure information in the dynamics of parsing , 2004, Cognition.

[38]  M. Schlesewsky,et al.  The neural mechanisms of word order processing revisited: Electrophysiological evidence from Japanese , 2008, Brain and Language.

[39]  Angela D. Friederici,et al.  Prosody-driven Sentence Processing: An Event-related Brain Potential Study , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[40]  Ann Cutler,et al.  Prosody in the Comprehension of Spoken Language: A Literature Review , 1997, Language and speech.

[41]  A. Friederici,et al.  Intonational phrase structure processing at different stages of syntax acquisition: ERP studies in 2-, 3-, and 6-year-old children. , 2011, Developmental science.

[42]  Dorothee J. Chwilla,et al.  Monitoring in Language Perception , 2009, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[43]  M. Kutas,et al.  Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association , 1984, Nature.

[44]  K. Rayner,et al.  Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[45]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Pitch accents in context: How listeners process accentuation in referential communication , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[46]  Kai Alter,et al.  Prosody in Dialogues and Single Sentences: How Prosody can influence Speech Perception , 2004 .

[47]  Karsten Steinhauer,et al.  Event-related potentials show online influence of lexical biases on prosodic processing , 2010, Neuroreport.

[48]  Mireille Besson,et al.  Brain potentials during semantic and prosodic processing in French. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[49]  Katy Carlson,et al.  How Prosody Influences Sentence Comprehension , 2009, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[50]  A. Friederici.  The Time Course of Syntactic Activation During Language Processing: A Model Based on Neuropsychological and Neurophysiological Data , 1995, Brain and Language.

[51]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  The Interplay between Prosody and Syntax in Sentence Processing: The Case of Subject- and Object-control Verbs , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[52]  Angela D Friederici,et al.  Prosodic processing at the sentence level in infants , 2006, Neuroreport.

[53]  Zhixing Jin,et al.  The pragmatic meanings conveyed by function words in Chinese sentences: An ERP study , 2009, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[54]  A. Friederici.  Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[55]  R. Sandt,et al.  Focus: Linguistic, Cognitive, and Computational Perspectives , 1999 .

[56]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Reliability of prosodic cues for resolving syntactic ambiguity. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[57]  S. Gerhand,et al.  THE NEUROCOGNITION OF LANGUAGE. , 2000 .

[58]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Discourse, Syntax, and Prosody: The Brain Reveals an Immediate Interaction , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[59]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  The ERP and cognitive psychology: Conceptual issues. , 1995 .

[60]  Stefan Heim,et al.  Prosodic pitch accents in language comprehension and production: ERP data and acoustic analyses. , 2006, Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis.

[61]  Cheryl M. Beach,et al.  The interpretation of prosodic patterns at points of syntactic structure ambiguity: Evidence for cue trading relations☆ , 1991 .

[62]  A J Schafer,et al.  Intonational Disambiguation in Sentence Production and Comprehension , 2000, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[63]  Claudia Männel,et al.  Pauses and Intonational Phrasing: ERP Studies in 5-month-old German Infants and Adults , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.