Response of beams on a tensionless extensible geosynthetic-reinforced earth bed subjected to moving loads

Abstract In this paper analysis of an infinite beam resting on reinforced granular bed overlying a soft soil strata subjected to a moving load with constant velocity is presented. The separation between the beam and ground surface is taken into the account while analyzing the system. The upper reinforced granular bed is modeled by a rough membrane embedded in Pasternak shear layer overlying a series of compressible Winkler springs representing the underlying soft soil. The extensible geosynthetic is assumed to deform such that at interface the geosynthetic and the soil have same deformation. This condition eliminates the two interfacial shear stress parameters and at the same time also incorporates the stiffness of geosynthetic in the model. The lift up of the beam and mobilized tension in the geosynthetic layer are observed to be more for the tensionless foundation as compared to that reacting in tension and compression. It has been further observed that the flexural response of the infinite beam as well as of the reinforcement, are greatly affected by the velocity, intensity of load, relative compressibility of granular fill and stiffness of the geosynthetic. For the range of parameters studied the shear moduli of granular layers do not significantly affect the response of the beam.

[1]  J. T. Shahu,et al.  A RATIONAL METHOD FOR DESIGN OF RAILROAD TRACK FOUNDATION , 2000 .

[2]  S. Chandra,et al.  A study of settlement response of a geosynthetic-reinforced compressible granular fill-soft soil system , 1994 .

[3]  Sanjay Kumar Shukla,et al.  The effect of prestressing on the settlement characteristics of geosynthetic-reinforced soil , 1994 .

[4]  G. Gladwell,et al.  Elastic Analysis of Soil-Foundation Interaction , 1979 .

[5]  Braja M. Das,et al.  Principles of Foundation Engineering , 1984 .

[6]  J. H. Yin,et al.  Elastic Analysis of Soil-Geosynthetic Interaction , 2001 .

[7]  B. J. Torby Deflection Results From Moving Loads on a Beam That Rests Upon an Elastic Foundation Reacting in Compression Only , 1975 .

[8]  Madhira R. Madhav,et al.  Reinforced granular fill-soft soil system: confinement effect , 1994 .

[9]  Y. C. Das,et al.  Variational Approach to Beams on Elastic Foundations , 1971 .

[10]  J. H. Yin Modelling Geosynthetic-Reinforced Granular Fills Over Soft Soil , 1997 .

[11]  Sanjay Kumar Shukla,et al.  A generalized mechanical model for geosynthetic-reinforced foundation soil , 1994 .

[12]  Madhira R. Madhav,et al.  A NEW MODEL FOR GEOSYNTHETIC REINFORCED SOIL , 1988 .

[13]  N. S. V. Kameswara Rao,et al.  Onset of Separation Between a Beam and Tensionless Foundation Due to Moving Loads , 1974 .

[14]  Moshe Eisenberger,et al.  Beams on Variable Winkler Elastic Foundation , 1986 .

[15]  Jian-Hua Yin,et al.  Closed-Form Solution for Reinforced Timoshenko Beam on Elastic Foundation , 2000 .

[16]  J. H. Yin A Nonlinear Model of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Granular Fill Over Soft Soil , 1997 .

[17]  Hideo Saito,et al.  Steady-State Vibrations of a Beam on a Pasternak Foundation for Moving Loads , 1980 .

[18]  Madhira R. Madhav,et al.  Reinforced granular fill-soft soil system: Membrane effect , 1994 .

[19]  George G. Adams,et al.  Beam on tensionless elastic foundation , 1987 .

[20]  Madhira R. Madhav,et al.  Modified pasternak model for reinforced soil , 1989 .