Aligning Knowledge Management with Research Knowledge Governance

Research Knowledge production is the result from knowledge processes that happen at diverse networks spaces. Those spaces are supported by a cascade of systems (Data Management Systems, Information Management Systems, Knowledge Management Systems, Evaluation Systems and Monitoring Systems) that must be aligned to avoid formation of silos and barriers to the flows of information and knowledge. The energy that powers consists of the people and their connections; so there is crucial to understand and govern formal and informal networks. By take a holistic approach, we propose to join benefits of an efficient knowledge management with the implementation of knowledge governance mechanisms in order to improve Research Knowledge production and its impacts.

[1]  Victoria Lynn Packard,et al.  Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology , 2018, Reference Reviews.

[2]  W. López,et al.  Panorama general de la producción académica en la Psicología Iberoamericana, 2005-2007 , 2016 .

[3]  Contributor Jennifer A. W. Wright,et al.  Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Third Edition , 2014 .

[4]  Igor Chirikov,et al.  Research universities as knowledge networks: the role of institutional research , 2013 .

[5]  M. Kearney,et al.  Research universities: networking the knowledge economy , 2013 .

[6]  Barbara Good,et al.  Assessing the effects of a collaborative research funding scheme: An approach combining meta-evaluation and evaluation synthesis , 2012 .

[7]  Teresa Carvalho,et al.  Managerialism Rhetorics in Portuguese Higher Education , 2012 .

[8]  Jonathan Adams.  Collaborations: The rise of research networks , 2012, Nature.

[9]  B. Wixted,et al.  Environmental complexity and stakeholder theory in formal research network evaluations , 2012 .

[10]  J. David Johnson,et al.  Knowledge networks: Dilemmas and paradoxes , 2012, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[11]  G. Hickey,et al.  Improving the social robustness of research networks for sustainable natural resource management: Results of a Delphi study in Canada , 2012 .

[12]  Tomohiro Anzai,et al.  Holistic observation and monitoring of the impact of interdisciplinary academic research projects: An empirical assessment in Japan , 2012 .

[13]  Alan L. Porter,et al.  Assessing research network and disciplinary engagement changes induced by an NSF program , 2012 .

[14]  Anna R Gagliardi,et al.  The guideline implementability research and application network (GIRAnet): an international collaborative to support knowledge exchange: study protocol , 2012, Implementation Science.

[15]  R. Ladle,et al.  Assessing insularity in global science , 2012, Scientometrics.

[16]  Guillermo Andrés Lemarchand,et al.  The long-term dynamics of co-authorship scientific networks: Iberoamerican countries (1973–2010) , 2012 .

[17]  David J. Pauleen,et al.  KM Governance: the mechanisms for guiding and controlling KM programs , 2012, J. Knowl. Manag..

[18]  Hannes Toivanen,et al.  African regional innovation systems: bibliometric analysis of research collaboration patterns 2005–2009 , 2011, Scientometrics.

[19]  Bing He,et al.  Mining enriched contextual information of scientific collaboration: A meso perspective , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[20]  Ana Tereza Pinto Filipecki,et al.  Descrição e análise do uso de um instrumento de coordenação em um instituto público de pesquisa em biomedicina , 2011 .

[21]  S. Manson,et al.  Social Network Analysis of the Academic GIScience Community , 2011 .

[22]  Robert R. Christian,et al.  Evolution of Collaboration within the US Long Term Ecological Research Network , 2010 .

[23]  J. Kirchner,et al.  Collaborative research between clinicians and researchers: a multiple case study of implementation , 2010, Implementation science : IS.

[24]  Joseph T. Mahoney,et al.  Exploring Knowledge Governance , 2010 .

[25]  Richard Heidler,et al.  Knowledge production and the structure of collaboration networks in two scientific fields , 2010, Scientometrics.

[26]  C. Zingerli.  A Sociology of International Research Partnerships for Sustainable Development , 2010 .

[27]  Sharmila Jayasingam,et al.  Influencing knowledge workers: the power of top management , 2010, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[28]  Manuel V. Heitor,et al.  Portugal at the crossroads of change, facing the shock of the new: People, knowledge and ideas fostering the social fabric to facilitate the concentration of knowledge integrated communities ☆ , 2010 .

[29]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Mapping the geography of science: Distribution patterns and networks of relations among cities and institutes , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[30]  Michael Pidd,et al.  Why modelling and model use matter , 2010, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[31]  R. Quintella,et al.  Network dynamics in scientific knowledge acquisition: an analysis in three public universities in the state of Bahia , 2009 .

[32]  Alan Singleton,et al.  Citation Statistics , 2009, ArXiv.

[33]  Duane Windsor,et al.  Tightening corporate governance , 2009 .

[34]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes , 2009 .

[35]  Elias G. Carayannis,et al.  'Mode 3' and 'Quadruple Helix': toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem , 2009, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[36]  N. Foss.  Alternative Research Strategies in the Knowledge Movement: From Macro Bias to Micro-Foundations and Multi-Level Explanation , 2009 .

[37]  S. Ball.  Privatising education, privatising education policy, privatising educational research: network governance and the ‘competition state’ , 2009 .

[38]  Arménio Rego,et al.  Factores satisfacientes e insatisfacientes dos utilizadores de websites: Um estudo de caso , 2008 .

[39]  S. Jong.  Academic organizations and new industrial fields: Berkeley and Stanford after the rise of biotechnology , 2008 .

[40]  E. B. Acworth,et al.  University–industry engagement: The formation of the Knowledge Integration Community (KIC) model at the Cambridge-MIT Institute , 2008 .

[41]  A. Bonaccorsi.  Search Regimes and the Industrial Dynamics of Science , 2008 .

[42]  Branco Ponomariov,et al.  Faculty publication productivity, collaboration, and grants velocity: using curricula vitae to compare center-affiliated and unaffiliated scientists , 2008 .

[43]  Elizabeth A. Corley,et al.  University research centers and the composition of research collaborations , 2008 .

[44]  H. V. Lente,et al.  Re-thinking new knowledge production: A literature review and a research agenda , 2008 .

[45]  S. Manning.  Linking Educational Research Activities across Europe: A Review of the WIFO Gateway to Research on Education in Europe , 2007 .

[46]  Juan A. Almendral,et al.  The network of scientific collaborations within the European framework programme , 2007, 0901.3375.

[47]  R. Rhodes.  Understanding Governance: Ten Years On , 2007 .

[48]  David J. Pauleen,et al.  KM governance: investigating the case of a knowledge intensive research organisation , 2007, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[49]  Harvey B. Newman,et al.  Networking for High Energy and Nuclear Physics , 2007, Comput. Phys. Commun..

[50]  James E. Allen,et al.  Formal versus Informal Knowledge Networks in R&D: A Case Study Using Social Network Analysis , 2007 .

[51]  Clark A. Miller.  Democratization, International Knowledge Institutions, and Global Governance , 2007 .

[52]  R. Goffee,et al.  Leading clever people. , 2007, Harvard business review.

[53]  N. Foss.  The Emerging Knowledge Governance Approach: Challenges and Characteristics , 2007 .

[54]  Abel L Packer,et al.  Articles with authors affiliated to Brazilian institutions published from 1994 to 2003 with 100 or more citations: I - the weight of international collaboration and the role of the networks. , 2006, Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias.

[55]  Francisco J. Acedo,et al.  Co-Authorship in Management and Organizational Studies: An Empirical and Network Analysis , 2006 .

[56]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Science in Brazil. Part 2: Sectoral and institutional research profiles , 2006, Scientometrics.

[57]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Science in Brazil. Part 1: A macro-level comparative study , 2006, Scientometrics.

[58]  Mu-Yen Chen,et al.  Knowledge management performance evaluation: a decade review from 1995 to 2004 , 2006, J. Inf. Sci..

[59]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Domesticity and internationality in co-authorship, references and citations , 2005, Scientometrics.

[60]  E. Sørensen,et al.  The democratic Anchorage of Governance Networks , 2005 .

[61]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies , 2004, Scientometrics.

[62]  Y. Helble,et al.  The Importance of Internal and External R&D Network Linkages for R&D Organisations: Evidence from Singapore , 2004 .

[63]  Anthony Lowrie,et al.  Academic Research Networks:: A Key to Enhancing Scholarly Standing , 2004 .

[64]  Jason Potts,et al.  Micro-meso-macro , 2004 .

[65]  Elizabeth A. Corley,et al.  Scientists' collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital , 2004 .

[66]  Frans van Waarden,et al.  ‘Governance’ as a bridge between disciplines: Cross-disciplinary inspiration regarding shifts in governance and problems of governability, accountability and legitimacy , 2004 .

[67]  Andrew Kakabadse,et al.  Reviewing the knowledge management literature: towards a taxonomy , 2003, J. Knowl. Manag..

[68]  Malin Brännback,et al.  R&D collaboration: role of Ba in knowledge-creating networks , 2003 .

[69]  Seamus Grimes,et al.  Building a Knowledge Economy in Ireland Through European Research Networks , 2003 .

[70]  Linda Argote,et al.  Managing Knowledge in Organizations: An Integrative Framework and Review of Emerging Themes , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[71]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[72]  Ronald J. Pohoryles.  The Making of the European Research Area--a View from Research Networks , 2002 .

[73]  Sami Gülgöz,et al.  Turkey's output in social science publications: 1970-1999 , 2002, Scientometrics.

[74]  Andrew Pettigrew,et al.  The determinants of research group performance: Towards Mode 2? , 2002 .

[75]  G. Laudel.  What do we measure by co-authorships? , 2002 .

[76]  Hildrun Kretschmer,et al.  Foundation of a Global Interdisciplinary Research Network (COLLNET) with Berlin as the Virtual Centre , 2001, Scientometrics.

[77]  Jay Liebowitz,et al.  Knowledge management: A U.S. Social Security Administration case study , 2001, Gov. Inf. Q..

[78]  Michael McGuire,et al.  Big Questions in Public Network Management Research , 2001 .

[79]  A. Neely,et al.  The performance prism in practice , 2001 .

[80]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations , 2001, cond-mat/0104162.

[81]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[82]  J. Rowley.  Is higher education ready for knowledge management , 2000 .

[83]  J. Swan,et al.  Trust and inter-organizational networking , 2000 .

[84]  Alberto Carneiro,et al.  How does knowledge management influence innovation and competitiveness? , 2000, J. Knowl. Manag..

[85]  Michael H. Zack,et al.  Developing a Knowledge Strategy , 1999 .

[86]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[87]  J. S. Katz,et al.  What is research collaboration , 1997 .

[88]  R. Rhodes,et al.  The New Governance: Governing without Government , 1996 .

[89]  Mats Alvesson,et al.  Organizations As Rhetoric: Knowledge‐Intensive Firms And The Struggle With Ambiguity , 1993 .

[90]  W. Starbuck.  Learning by Knowledge-Intensive Firms , 1992 .

[91]  Ozgur Onday.  Network Theory , 2013 .

[92]  A. Rego,et al.  Journal of Knowledge Management Emerald Article: Improving knowledge management processes: a hybrid positive approach , 2012 .

[93]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Network Science: Theory, Tools, and Practice , 2012 .

[94]  Frank Cornelissen,et al.  Aspects of school–university research networks that play a role in developing, sharing and using knowledge based on teacher research , 2011 .

[95]  Annarella Perra,et al.  Classics Teaching Through ICT Experience to ICT Manual for Classics Teachers , 2009 .

[96]  Chris Groeneboer,et al.  An Overview of Knowledge Translation , 2009 .

[97]  M. Lytras,et al.  Measuring and Reporting Technological Capital in Companies , 2009 .

[98]  I. Kauranen,et al.  Emerging Topics and Technologies in Information Systems , 2009 .

[99]  Martin Everett,et al.  Ego network betweenness , 2005, Soc. Networks.

[100]  Theo Bothma,et al.  DISSAnet: Development of an information science research network in the Republic of South Africa 1998-2000 , 2002, Educ. Inf..

[101]  Rebecca Henderson,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Putting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MIT , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[102]  Chris Skelcher,et al.  The Dynamics of Multi‐organizational Partnerships: an Analysis of Changing Modes of Governance , 1998 .

[103]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How , 1995 .

[104]  City Research Online , 2022 .